RAD Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

RAD Review

Description:

COP 3331 Object-Oriented Analysis and Design 1. RAD Review ... Architectural Styles [pp. 237 246] Repository [classic DB] Model/View/Controller ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: bernd183
Learn more at: http://www.cs.fsu.edu
Category:
Tags: rad | review

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RAD Review


1
RAD Review
  • Describes system completely from actors point of
    view
  • Basis of client developer communication
  • Platform for launch of system design
    development
  • Provides these specific items
  • Set of nonfunctional requirements and constraints
  • Use case model describing functionality of system
    from clients perspective
  • Object model describing entities manipulated by
    system
  • Sequence diagram for each use case showing
    sequence of interactions among participating
    objects
  • Analysis Model

2
Design Overview
  • Design Overview (Ch 6)
  • Review of RAD
  • System Design
  • System Design Concepts
  • System Design Goals
  • (Global) System Design (Ch 7)
  • Design Goals
  • Software Architecture
  • Boundary Use Cases
  • SDD
  • Subsystem Design
  • Patterns (Ch 8)
  • Interfaces (Ch 9)
  • Mapping to Code (Ch 10)

3
System Design Concepts
  • Subsystems
  • Relate to Analysis Objects
  • Coupling and Cohesion
  • Services / Subsystem Interfaces
  • Hierarchical Decomposition
  • open v closed
  • Partition Decomposition
  • Architectural Styles pp. 237 246
  • Repository classic DB
  • Model/View/Controller
  • Client/Server
  • Peer to Peer
  • 3-Tier Interface Application Logic Storage
  • 4-Tier Client Interface Server Interface
    Application Logic Storage
  • Pipe Filter ps auswww grep lacher sort
    more

4
System Design Activities
  • 0. Starting Point RAD
  • 1. Identify Design Goals from non-functional
    requirements
  • performance criteria p. 249
  • dependability criteria p. 249
  • cost criteria p. 250
  • maintenance criteria p. 250
  • end user criteria p. 251
  • Design Goal Tradeoffs p. 251
  • 2. Identify Subsystems
  • influenced by
  • use cases
  • lower cross-boundary associations lower
    coupling
  • functionally related objects higher cohesion

5
System Design Activities (cont)
  • 3. Address Design Goals
  • Note BEFORE subsystem designs
  • Select OTS legacy components
  • Map subsystems to hardware
  • Proxy Design Pattern
  • Plan infrastructure for management of persistent
    data
  • Identify persistent objects
  • Select storage management strategy see fig 7-7,
    p. 269
  • flat files
  • relational DB
  • OODB
  • Specify access control policies can of worms
  • Global access table
  • Access control map (associated with each class)
    table.column
  • Capability map (associated with each actor)
    table.row

6
System Design Activities (cont)
  • 3. Address Design Goals (cont)
  • Design global control flow
  • Procedure Driven
  • Event Driven
  • Threaded
  • Identify boundary conditions
  • Configuration
  • Startup / Shutdown
  • Exception Handling
  • Administration Use Cases generated by design
    team
  • Key Roles
  • Architect
  • Architecture Liaisons member of subsystem team
  • Document Editor
  • Configuration Manager
  • Reviewer

7
Iteration!
8
Closing the Gap
  • Client with problem ... Machine huge
    distance
  • Analysis, resulting in RAD ... Machine gap
    is smaller
  • System Design, resulting in SDD ... Machine
    smaller still
  • At this point SDD should specify a virtual
    machine VM
  • Object design and mapping to code reduce gap even
    further, to point where compilers completely
    close the gap
  • Notice that we always work from left to right
    (with feedback loops)
  • Client -gt Analysis -gt RAD -gt System Design -gt SDD
    -gt Object Design
  • -gt Code -gt Build -gt executable system
  • Feedback loops at each stage
  • Changes at any stage usually require re-work of
    all following stages, so emphasis should be on
    localized feedback loops (i.e., go back only one
    step, repeat until correct)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com