User Responses to Social Bookmarking at MLibrary - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

User Responses to Social Bookmarking at MLibrary

Description:

Give users a stake in our collections. What MTagger Does ... Collections. MLibrary (library web pages) ... Handling of 'collections' Workflow. Lessons Learned ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: kenva
Learn more at: https://varnum.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: User Responses to Social Bookmarking at MLibrary


1
User Responses to Social Bookmarking at MLibrary
  • Ken Varnum
  • varnum_at_umich.edu
  • Web Systems Manager
  • University of Michigan Library

2
What Is MTagger?
  • Library-Based Tagging Tool
  • delicious
  • fURL
  • Social networking tools (Flickr, Facebook, etc.)
  • Way to organize academic bookmarks
  • Always accessible
  • Shared with others
  • Build a common pool of knowledge

3
Why?
  • Give our users a way to organize most library
    resources
  • Demonstrate 2.0 technologies to ourselves
  • Improve findability of resources
  • Give users a stake in our collections

4
What MTagger Does
  • Allows users to assign keywords to library
    stuff on our site
  • Catalog
  • Web Pages
  • Digital Images
  • Library publications
  • Or anything, anywhere (via bookmarklet)
  • Search, display, retrieve bookmarks

5
Inherits from
  • Delicious.com
  • Penn Tags
  • Flickr
  • Facebook
  • Many other social bookmarking sites

6
What Is Different?
  • Collections
  • MLibrary (library web pages)
  • Mirlyn (library catalog)
  • Digital Images
  • Scholarly Publishing
  • Everything Else
  • Integration with Site

7
How MTagger Is Used
  • Tags are generally tagger-centric
  • Exception Librarians tag differently

8
(No Transcript)
9
Usage
  • Basic Stats (as of 3/26/09)
  • 1357 total users 603 actively tagging
  • 3775 tags 3159 unique
  • 2820 unique URIs tagged
  • Not as broadly / deeply as wed like

10
Perceptions of MTagger
  • Interviews with users, non-users, and librarian
    users
  • Personal motivations are stronger than social
    motivations
  • Preference for tag display alongside traditional
    search results
  • Tagging needs a marketing campaign
  • Tagging is a "Librarian" thing

11
Privacy
  • Tagging tied to U-M single sign-on (uniqname)
    guest accounts welcome
  • Accountability public face
  • Balance of anonymity and sharing
  • Most feedback on this issue from a single source

12
Usability Study
  • Conducted over four months in summer 2008
  • Two students at U-M School of Information
  • Librarians on steering committee

13
Usability Recommendations
  • Tag cloud display on pages
  • Tag cloud display in MTagger
  • Handling of collections
  • Workflow

14
Lessons Learned
  • Personal motivations are stronger than social
    motivations
  • Focus on outcomes of tagging, not process
  • Enable personal reference library
  • Increase flexibility of tag display/retrieval
  • Contextualize the material that users bookmark

15
When Its not Enough to Say,I Tag You
  • Easier sharing
  • Tags
  • Tagged items
  • User lists
  • Publish to other social networking tools

16
Alternate Catalog Integration
17
Favorites Will be Tags
18
New Library Web Site
  • Better integration in new library web site
  • Make tagging a byproduct, not a product
  • Will influence search engine
  • My Library redux?

19
Bigger Picture
  • Benefit to scale (delicious)
  • Benefit to academic focus
  • Mechanism needed for sharing tags across libraries

20
Thank You
  • Email varnum_at_umich.edu
  • Blog RSS4Lib http//www.rss4lib.com/
  • Usability Reports
  • http//www.lib.umich.edu/usability/projects/MTagge
    r.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com