Putting Error Correction into Proper Perspective PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Putting Error Correction into Proper Perspective


1
Putting Error Correction into Proper Perspective
  • Georgette Ioup
  • Department of English
  • University of New Orleans

2
Changing Theories of Language teaching
  • Stage 1 Grammar Translation
  • Stage 2 Audio Lingual Method (ALM)
  • Stage 3 a.Communicative Competence
  • (W. Rivers, 1968)
  • b. L1 Acq. L2 Acq.
  • (Dulay Burt, 1974)

3
Krashens Monitor Model
  • Five Hypotheses
  • Acquisition / Learning Hypothesis
  • Natural Order Hypothesis
  • Monitor Hypothesis
  • Input Hypothesis
  • Affective Filter Hypothesis

4
Acquisition / Learning
  • Acquisition Subconscious processes
  • Learning Conscious formal knowledge

Formal Learning Learned Grammar Monitor
Natural Input Acquired Grammar Language Output
5
Input Hypothesis
  • Relates to Acquisition only.
  • We acquire by receiving Comprehensible input
    input that is a little beyond our current level.
  • Current Level i
  • Comprehensible Input - i 1

6
Critical Responses to Krashens Theory
  • Higgs Clifford, 1982
  • A. Terminal 2s
  • Street learners with uncorrected errors
  • B. Advocates accuracy first
  • (See also, Valette, 1991)

7
Critical Responses to Krashens Theory
  • White, 1987
  • Certain types of errors need rule instruction.
  • L1 French L2 English
  • 1. Mary studied the lesson carefully
  • 2. Carefully Mary studied the lesson
  • 3. Mary studied carefully the lesson

8
Critical Responses to Krashens Theory
  • Long, 1991
  • Focus on Form, not Focus on Forms
  • Focus on Forms Teaching isolated rules
  • Focus on Form teaching rules in context

9
Critical Responses to Krashens Theory
  • Ellis, 1990
  • Forms that contribute little to communication
    tend to be ignored. They need attention.

10
Critical Responses to Krashens Theory
  • Schmidt, 1994
  • Must notice the gap.
  • When there is a discrepancy between a TL form and
    an IL form, adults wont notice it unless
    attention is drawn to it.

11
In Support of Krashens Theory
  • VanPatten, 1988
  • No evidence that terminal learners are
    terminal.
  • Early focus on grammar will inhibit developing
    fluency.

12
In Support of Krashens Theory
  • Schwartz, 1993
  • LAD can only accept natural input
  • Includes syntactic rules of Universal Grammar
  • Excludes morphology and lexicon
  • These two can be learned formally.

13
In Support of Krashens Theory
  • Paradis, 1994
  • Explicit Knowledge -gt Declarative Memory
  • Consciously accessible knowledge
  • Facts and Concepts
  • Ex Formal knowledge of grammar rules

14
In Support of Krashens Theory
  • Paradis, 1994
  • Implicit Knowledge -gt Procedural Memory
  • Information derived unconsciously
  • Skills and Processes
  • Ex Natural language acquisition

15
In Support of Krashens Theory
  • Paradis, 1994
  • Declarative memory cannot translate into
    procedural memory.
  • Each uses a different part of the brain.

16
Sounding Alarms
  • The American Scene
  • Valette, 1991, Modern Language Journal
  • The level of foreign language proficiency has
    deteriorated in the last 25 years. The median
    proficiency score for foreign language majors is
    now probably no higher than 1.
  • Two causes contact with inaccurate models and
    the acceptance (or non-correction) of inaccurate
    speech production.

17
Sounding Alarms
  • The British Scene
  • Mitchell, 2000, Applied Linguistics
  • Grenfell (1999) has documented current
    disillusionment and uncertainty among the MFL
    professional community in England with the
    present National Curriculum/GCSE framework.
  • despite the focus on communication, a
    disappointing proportion of pupils are making the
    transition to creative control of the TL system.

18
Research Comparing Implicit and Explicit Language
Teaching
  • Scott, 1989
  • Explicit condition performed better
  • Alenan, 1995
  • The groups who received rules performed better
  • Robinson, 1995
  • Instructed groups better on easy rules
  • VanPatten Oikkenon, 1996
  • Explicit rule group did worse
  • Conflicting results could be due to monitoring

19
Research on Error Correction in Writing
  • It is effective improves writing proficiency
  • Cardell Carno (1982)
  • It gives no advantage over no correction
  • Fathman Walley (1990)
  • It is ineffective doesnt improve writing
    proficiency
  • Kepner (1991)
  • Semke (1984)
  • It impedes proficiency development
  • Sheppard (1992)

20
Research on Error Correction in Writing
  • Truscott, 1996
  • A. Agrees with Krashen and Schwartz
  • According to learning theory, structures learned
    through error correction cant become part of the
    internal grammar.
  • B. Advocates an end to grammar correction in
    writing
  • It is ineffective and harmful.

21
Research on Error Correction in Writing
  • Ferris (1999)
  • Argues for a role for grammar correction.
  • Claims studies are inclusive.
  • Truscotts radical stance is premature.

22
Weakness in Focus-on-Form Research
  • My problem with focus-on-form studies
  • They cover a short period of time.
  • Similar view expressed in
  • DeKeyser, 1977

23
Two Questions
  • Can formal instruction help, if formal learning
    cannot become part of the acquired grammar?
  • Why might it take a long time for the formal
    learning to become effective?

24
Answer to Question 1Can instruction help?
  • Paradis (1994), DeKeyser (2002), Hulstijn (2002)
  • Explicit Knowledge -gt Declarative Memory
  • Consciously accessible knowledge
  • Facts and Concepts
  • Ex Formal knowledge of grammar rules

25
Answer to Question 1Can instruction help?
  • Paradis (1994), DeKeyser (2002), Hulstijn (2002)
  • Implicit Knowledge -gt Procedural Memory
  • Information derived unconsciously
  • Skills and Processes
  • Ex Natural language acquisition

26
Answer to Question 1Can instruction help?
  • Paradis (1994), DeKeyser (2002), Hulstijn (2002)
  • Declarative memory cannot translate into
    procedural memory.
  • Each uses a different part of the brain.

27
Answer to Question 1Can instruction help?
  • Anderson (1995), DeKeyser (2002), Hulstijn
    (2002),
  • Paradis (1994)
  • Each time one uses a metalinguistic declarative
    rule,
  • One simultaneously builds unconscious, implicit
    procedural knowledge.

28
Answer to Question 1Can instruction help?
  • Hulstijn, 2002
  • Metalinguistic knowledge doesnt actually
    transform into implicit knowledge.
  • An implicit network that is separate from and in
    addition to the explicit system is independently
    constructed.

29
Answer to Question 2Why might it take a long
time?
  • McLaughlin (1990), DeKeyser (2001)
  • Complex skills start as controlled processes.
    Given
  • Time
  • Attention
  • They become automatic routines.
  • It is practice which accomplishes this.

30
Answer to Question 2Why might it take a long
time?
  • Shriffrin Schneider, 1986
  • The development of automaticity for generalized
    skills depends on high levels of practice.
  • McLaughlin, 1990
  • A skill must be practiced again and again and
    again, until no attention is required for
    performance.

31
Answer to Question 2Why might it take a long
time?
  • Anderson, 1995
  • A second factor is important for automaticity
    feedback.

32
My Study
  • Jenny
  • Immigrated to the U.S. at age 10
  • Mainstreamed into regular classes, no ESL
  • Entered university at age 19
  • Many fossilized grammar errors
  • Required to take ESL classes
  • Needed 7 semesters plus one summer tutoring to
    destabilize her errors
  • I argue that rule isolation and error correction
    destabilized her fossilized structures

33
Type of Instruction Given
  • Some formal rule presentation
  • Consistent feedback on errors in written work
  • Revision with error correction required

34
Two Contributions that Instruction Provided
  • Made her aware of which forms were incorrect
  • Gave her the necessary practice to change her
    grammar

35
Table 1 Proficiency Scores on Initial Placement
and End of Semester Exams
MTAC MTELP COMP
Initial Placement 88 85 58
Intensive 90 86 78
Nonintensive I
Time 1 87 88 81
Time 2 92 87 81
Time 3 90 81 85
Nonintensive 2
Time 1 87 89 89
Time 2 93 89 87
Time 3 90 90 88
36
Figure 1. T-unit analyses of 200-word samples at
3 different levels.
37
Figure 2. Mean percent of error-free T-units per
sample at 3 different levels.
38
Table 2Comparison of Selected Errors by Level
Prep Tense Article Verb Form Plural-s
Entry 4 18 19 15 9
Midway 1 4 6 4 6
Exit 4 2 1 6 4
39
Persistent Errors
  • Because of S
  • Because of my fathers restaurant short of
    hand.
  • Make Infinitive
  • made the car to go in reverse
  • Finally eradicated at exit level

40
Conclusion
  • Focus-on-form combined with abundant
    contextualized practice and feedback can aid a
    communicative learning approach.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com