Title: Trends in Wireless Communications
1Trends in Wireless Communications
- Geert Leus
- Delft University of Technology
- g.leus_at_tudelft.nl
- Acknowledgements
- STW via VIDI-TVCOM and VICI-SPCOM
- TNO via UCAC
- University of Perugia
- Michigan Technological University
- Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
2Outline
- Communications over time-varying channels
- Feedback in single-user and multi-user MIMO
systems - Ultra wideband communications
- Cognitive radio
3Communications over time-varying channels
4Problem Statement
- Many wireless communications standards assume the
channel is time-invariant over a block (mainly
OFDM) IEEE802.11, IEEE802.16d, DVB-T, - When used in high mobility situations, problems
occur and the orthogonality among subcarriers
gets lost IEEE802.16e, DVB-H, underwater
communications, ... - Special transceiver signal processing techniques
are required to solve this self-interference
problem
5OFDM
- Using a cyclic prefix, we get a circular
convolution
6OFDM
- How does this circular convolution look like?
7OFDM
- We take IDFT and DFT at transmitter and receiver
8OFDM
- We assume guard intervals are removed
9OFDM Equalization
Non-banded equalizers
Banded equalizers
block MMSE banded
block MMSE non-banded
Block equalizers
Choi et al, TCOM 01
Rugini et al, COML 05
serial MMSE non-banded
serial MMSE banded
Serial equalizers
Cai-Giannakis, TCOM 03
Schniter, TSP 04
10Improving Band Assumption
- Transmitter and receiver windows or pulse shapes
have been developed to improve the subcarrier
orthogonality and reduce the cyclic prefix length - We relax these windows to improve the band
approximation instead of the subcarrier
orthogonality - These methods are low-complexity in the sense
that they have a complexity that is linear in the
number of subcarriers - Such schemes have also been labeled as
generalized multicarrier systems
11Channel Estimation
- There are too many unknowns to estimate
- We need a reduced model that exploits the
correlation
Basis expansion model (BEM)
12Channel Estimation
- Polynomial BEM
- Complex Exponential BEM
13Channel Estimation
- Pilots are inserted in the frequency domain
selected received samples
pilots
14Extensions
- Non-linear equalization
- Decision-feedback equalization
- Iterative equalization
- Improved channel estimation
- Semi-blind channel estimation
- Iterative channel estimation
- Extensions to MIMO
- Spatial multiplexing (with or without precoding)
- Space-time block coding
15Simulation Results
N 128 subcarriers NA N active subcarriers L
5 channel taps fD / ?f 0.35 Doppler spread Q
3 bandwidth equalizer
Channel estimation parameters 8 pilots K2N256
resolution CE-BEM P4 basis functions LMMSE
estimator
16Application
- UCAC project UUV - Covert Acoustic
Communications
17Application
- Different partners are testing different
technologies to transfer a certain number of bits
at the lowest SNR - TNO and Delft University of Technology study OFDM
- Loss of orthogonality among subcarriers is a
major problem when using OFDM in this set-up - The proposed methods can be used to solve problem
- Multi-band OFDM is used to reduce complexity
18Application
Time-invariant estimator
Time-varying estimator
19Feedback for Single- and Multi-User MIMO Systems
20Why feedback?
- Feedback of the channel state information (CSI)
in a single-user multiple-input multiple-output
(MIMO) system allows for improved capacity, SNR,
BER, - Example
- Feedback in a multi-user MIMO system allows for
the exploitation of the so-called multi-user
diversity by selecting the right set of users
Capacity MISO with CSIT
Capacity MISO without CSIT
21Feedback for Single-User MIMO
- Both spatial multiplexing and space-time coding
are incorporated in the above model - The precoder adapts the transmitted signal to
the current channel conditions
CSI est. and detection
Spat. mux. or ST code
precoder
Low-rate feedback link
22Feedback for Single-User MIMO
- Many different feedback schemes have been
proposed - Statistical feedback of the CSI useful if the
channel varies too rapidly to track accurately - Quantized feedback of the CSI can exploit strong
spatial modes if channel varies slowly - We focus on quantized feedback
23Quantized Feedback
- Quantized feedback is based on codebook of
precoders
- Quantization steps are related to vector
quantization
precoder construction (decoder)
index selection (encoder)
- The funtion can yield different
measures - Some distance between and
- Some performance measure of a chosen receiver
- Capacity loss due to quantization
24Quantized Feedback
- Codebook design procedures
- Grassmannian sphere packing the precoders are
optimally packed w.r.t. some subspace distance - Generalized Lloyd algorithm the precoders are
designed by iteratively minimizing the average
distortion (done in 2 steps) - Monte-Carlo algorithm randomly generate a large
set of codebooks and select the one that
minimizes the average distortion - Last two approaches make use of a large training
set of channels, generated according to some
statistics
25Quantized Feedback Extensions
- MIMO-OFDM systems
- Correlation between carriers can be exploited to
reduce feedback and/or improve performance - Entropy coding
- Clustering
- Finite-state vector quantization
- Time-varying MIMO systems
- Similar methods can be used to exploit the time
correlation of the channel to reduce feedback
and/or improve performance
26Feedback for Multi-User MIMO
- In this case feedback is also used for user
scheduling - Let us consider the single-antenna users case
User 1
User 2
beamformer
User 3
Low-rate feedback links
27Feedback for Multi-User MIMO
- Basic scheme opportunistic beamforming (OBF)
- The base station broadcasts a random beam
- Every user estimates its received SNR
- This received SNR is fed back to the base station
- Base station selects the user with the highest
SNR - Extensions
- OBF with beam selection (OBF-S)
- Opportunistic SDMA (OSDMA)
- OSDMA with beam selection (OSDMA-S)
- Fairness and delay play an important role here
- Difficult to exploit frequency- and
time-correlation
28Feedback for Multi-User MIMO
- Alternatively, feedback of channel information
allows exploitation of frequency- and
time-correlation, as well as specific spatial
correlation patterns - Every set of users is
related to a quantized channel matrix
and a beamformer
(ZF or MMSE) - Take the set that maximizes the sum rate
- Codebook design is the same as before
29Feedback of Multi-User MIMO
- Frequency- and time-correlation can for instance
be exploited by predictive vector quantization
2-antenna base station 2 users treated per slot 3
bits feedback per user
30Ultra Wideband Communications
31UWB Drivers
- Demand for short-range high-rate wireless
capability - Smaller semiconductor costs and power consumption
- Fragmented spectrum and discontinuous use of bands
32Key Features of UWB
- High rate for short range
- Low-complexity and low-cost equipment
- Low transmit power and noise-like spectrum
- Multipath and interference immunity
- High penetration capability
- Accurate positioning
- Use of radio as a sensor (radar features)
33IEEE Standardization
- IEEE 802.15.3a
- High-rate
- Not restricted to UWB but lends itself to it
- 100 Mbps within 10 m and 480 Mbps within 2 m
- Activities stopped in February 2006
- IEEE 802.15.4a
- Low-rate / low-complexity
- Operate in unlicensed bands
- Focus on WPAN, sensor networks, smart badges,
- Standard is being finalized
34Generic Pulsed UWB Receiver
35Subsampling UWB
PPM bits
n(t)
...
...
PPM
h
(t)
spr.
mod
c
t
0
t
PAM
...
...
mod
...
...
t
t
0
0
t
t
PAM bits
FFT
ADC
est t
PPM bits
equal.
DC
despr.
k
est c
PAM bits
k
Rx analog
Rx digital
36Subsampling UWB
PRR 20 MHz
Sample rate
78 MHz
156 MHz
313 MHz
625 MHz
1.25 GHz
37Subsampling UWB
PRR 20 MHz
Modulation index
? 2 ns
? 4 ns
? 8 ns
? 16 ns
Sample rate
156 MHz
38Transmitted Reference UWB
n(t)
reference pulse
...
...
delay
spr.
h
(t)
c
t
0
t
PAM
...
...
mod
...
...
t
t
0
0
t
t
PAM bits
ADC
PAM bits
despr.
equal.
DC
delay
Rx analog
Rx digital
39Transmitted Reference UWB
40Transmitted Reference UWB
PRR 20 MHz
AWGN
CM1
Sample rate
20 MHz
41UWB Testbed
AWG
RS232
PC
ADC EVALUATION BOARD
USB CABLE
FPGA BOARD
42Cognitive Radio
43Introduction
- Current wireless systems are characterized by
wasteful static spectrum allocation - Dynamic spectrum allocation (DSA) shows promises
to alleviate the inefficient usage of the
spectrum - Frequency-agile cognitive radios (CRs) are key to
this
44Introduction
- The term cognitive radio was first coined by
Mitola in 1999 and can be defined as in 2006 by
IEEE A type of radio that can sense and
autonomously reason about its environment and
adapt accordingly. This radio could employ
machine learning mechanisms in establishing,
conducting or concluding communication and
networking functions with other radios - Two CR-related standards are under development
- IEEE 802.22 high rate access (1.5 Mb/s) in rural
areas up to 100 km in coverage - IEEE 802.11h WLANs with dynamic frequency
selection transmit power control capabilities
45Considered Set-Up
- A peer-to-peer CR network where each user
corresponds to a single transmitter-receiver pair - On top of that there is interference from primary
users
46How does it work?
- CRs dynamically decide the allocation of the
available resources to improve the network-wide
spectrum efficiency, a.k.a. dynamic resource
allocation (DRA) - The DRA task can be efficiently performed in a
distributed fashion where every CR iteratively
senses the available resources, and adjusts its
own usage accordingly - The resources can be represented by transmitter
and receiver basis functions (carriers, pulses,
codes, wavelets, etc.) which can be chosen to
enable various agile platforms, such as
frequency-, time-, or code-division multiplexing
(FDM, TDM, CDM)
47How does it work?
- Sensing part
- Sensing its own link is done by training
techniques - Sensing the interference is difficult due to the
large number of possible resources, but since the
actual number of used resources is small,
compressive sampling mechanisms can be used - Adapting part
- Given its own link and the interference, the CR
optimizes its spectral efficiency under certain
power and spectral mask constraints
48Some Results
- Assume ideal case with carriers as waveforms
Large interference
Small interference
49Discussion and Extensions
- Generally, DRA is done independently from
waveform optimization, but this has a number of
cons - DRA has to run on a central level
- If distributed DRA is used, every CR requires the
knowledge of the links to the other CRs and the
decisions taken at the other CRs - Sparsity constraints can be included in the
optimization to limit the actual number of used
resources - Band-limited feedback is required from the
receiver to the transmitter, which can be taken
into account in the optimization procedure
50 Comments? Questions?