Overview of Storage and Indexing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Overview of Storage and Indexing

Description:

... pages is much cheaper than reading them in random order ... Examples of composite key. indexes using lexicographic order. Murali Mani. Composite Search Keys ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: pcgu2
Learn more at: http://web.cs.wpi.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Overview of Storage and Indexing


1
Overview of Storage and Indexing
  • (based on slides from Wisconsin)

2
Data on External Storage
  • Disks Can retrieve random page at fixed cost
  • But reading several consecutive pages is much
    cheaper than reading them in random order
  • Tapes Can only read pages in sequence
  • Cheaper than disks used for archival storage
  • File organization Method of arranging a file of
    records on external storage.
  • Record id (rid) is sufficient to physically
    locate record
  • Indexes are data structures that allow us to find
    the record ids of records with given values in
    index search key fields
  • Architecture Buffer manager stages pages from
    external storage to main memory buffer pool. File
    and index layers make calls to the buffer manager.

3
Why Not Store Everything in Main Memory?
  • Cost. Disks always cheaper than memory.
  • Main memory is volatile. We want data to be
    saved between runs !!
  • Typical storage hierarchy
  • Main memory (RAM) for currently used data.
  • Disk for the main database (secondary storage).
  • Tapes for archiving older versions of the data
    (tertiary storage).

4
Disks
  • Secondary storage device of choice.
  • Main advantage over tapes random access vs.
    sequential.
  • Data is stored and retrieved in units called disk
    blocks or pages.
  • Unlike RAM, time to retrieve a disk page varies
    depending upon location on disk.
  • Therefore, relative placement of pages on disk
    has major impact on DBMS performance!

5
Components of a Disk
  • The platters spin (say, 90rps).
  • The arm assembly is moved in or out to position
    a head on a desired track. Tracks under heads
    make a cylinder (imaginary!).
  • Only one head reads/writes at any one time.
  • Block size is a multiple of
  • sector size (which is fixed).

6
Accessing a Disk Page
  • Time to access (read/write) a disk block
  • seek time (moving arms to position disk head on
    track)
  • rotational delay (waiting for block to rotate
    under head)
  • transfer time (actually moving data to/from disk
    surface)
  • Seek time and rotational delay dominate.
  • Seek time varies from about 1 to 20msec
  • Rotational delay varies from 0 to 10msec
  • Transfer rate is about 1msec per 4KB page
  • Key to lower I/O cost reduce seek/rotation
    delays! Hardware vs. software solutions?

7
Arranging Pages on Disk
  • Next block concept
  • blocks on same track, followed by
  • blocks on same cylinder, followed by
  • blocks on adjacent cylinder
  • Blocks in a file should be arranged sequentially
    on disk (by next), to minimize seek and
    rotational delay.
  • For a sequential scan, pre-fetching several pages
    at a time is a big win!

8
RAID
  • Disk Array Arrangement of several disks that
    gives abstraction of a single, large disk.
  • Goals Increase performance and reliability.
  • Two main techniques
  • Data striping Data is partitioned size of a
    partition is called the striping unit. Partitions
    are distributed over several disks.
  • Redundancy More disks gt can handle more
    failures. Redundant information allows
    reconstruction of data if a disk fails.

9
Disk Space Management
  • Lowest layer of DBMS software manages space on
    disk.
  • Higher levels call upon this layer to
  • allocate/de-allocate a page
  • read/write a page
  • Request for a sequence of pages must be satisfied
    by allocating the pages sequentially on disk!
    Higher levels dont need to know how this is
    done, or how free space is managed.

10
Buffer Management in a DBMS
Page Requests from Higher Levels
BUFFER POOL
disk page
free frame
MAIN MEMORY
DISK
choice of frame dictated by replacement policy
  • Data must be in RAM for DBMS to operate on it!
  • Table of ltframe, pageidgt pairs is maintained.

11
DBMS vs. OS File System
  • OS does disk space buffer mgmt why not let
    OS manage these tasks?
  • Differences in OS support portability issues
  • Some limitations, e.g., files cant span disks.

12
Record Formats Fixed Length
F1
F2
F3
F4
L1
L2
L3
L4
Base address (B)
Address BL1L2
  • Information about field types same for all
    records in a file stored in system catalogs.
  • Finding ith field does not require scan of
    record.

13
Record Formats Variable Length
  • Two alternative formats ( fields is fixed)
  • Second offers direct access to ith field,
    efficient storage
  • of nulls (special dont know value) small
    directory overhead.

14
Page Formats Fixed Length Records
  • Record id ltpage id, slot gt. In first
    alternative, moving records for free space
    management changes rid may not be acceptable.

15
Page Formats Variable Length Records
  • Can move records on page without changing rid
    so, attractive for fixed-length records too.

16
Files of Records
  • Page or block is OK when doing I/O, but higher
    levels of DBMS operate on records, and files of
    records.
  • FILE A collection of pages, each containing a
    collection of records. Must support
  • insert/delete/modify record
  • read a particular record (specified using record
    id)
  • scan all records (possibly with some conditions
    on the records to be retrieved)

17
Alternative File Organizations
  • Many alternatives exist, each ideal for some
    situations, and not so good in others
  • Heap (random order) files Suitable when typical
    access is a file scan retrieving all records.
  • Sorted Files Best if records must be retrieved
    in some order, or only a range of records is
    needed.
  • Indexes Data structures to organize records via
    trees or hashing.
  • Like sorted files, they speed up searches for a
    subset of records, based on values in certain
    (search key) fields
  • Updates are much faster than in sorted files.

18
Indexes
  • An index on a file speeds up selections on the
    search key fields for the index.
  • Any subset of the fields of a relation can be the
    search key for an index on the relation.
  • Search key is not the same as key (minimal set of
    fields that uniquely identify a record in a
    relation).
  • An index contains a collection of data entries,
    and supports efficient retrieval of all data
    entries k with a given key value k.

19
B Tree Indexes
  • Leaf pages contain data entries, and are chained
    (prev next)
  • Non-leaf pages have index entries only used to
    direct searches

20
Example B Tree
Note how data entries in leaf level are sorted
  • Find 28? 29? All gt 15 and lt 30
  • Insert/delete Find data entry in leaf, then
    change it. Need to adjust parent sometimes.
  • And change sometimes bubbles up the tree

21
Hash-Based Indexes
  • Good for equality selections.
  • Index is a collection of buckets.
  • Bucket primary page plus zero or more overflow
    pages.
  • Buckets contain data entries.
  • Hashing function h h(r) bucket in which (data
    entry for) record r belongs. h looks at the
    search key fields of r.
  • No need for index entries in this scheme.

22
Choice of Indexes
  • What indexes should we create?
  • Which relations should have indexes? What
    field(s) should be the search key? Should we
    build several indexes?
  • For each index, what kind of an index should it
    be?
  • Hash/tree?

23
Choice of Indexes (Contd.)
  • One approach Consider the most important queries
    in turn. Consider the best plan using the
    current indexes, and see if a better plan is
    possible with an additional index. If so, create
    it.
  • Obviously, this implies that we must understand
    how a DBMS evaluates queries and creates query
    evaluation plans!
  • For now, we discuss simple 1-table queries.
  • Before creating an index, must also consider the
    impact on updates in the workload!
  • Trade-off Indexes can make queries go faster,
    updates slower. Require disk space, too.

24
Index Selection Guidelines
  • Attributes in WHERE clause are candidates for
    index keys.
  • Exact match condition suggests hash index.
  • Range query suggests tree index.
  • Multi-attribute search keys should be considered
    when a WHERE clause contains several conditions.
  • Order of attributes is important for range
    queries.
  • Such indexes can sometimes enable index-only
    strategies for important queries.
  • Try to choose indexes that benefit as many
    queries as possible. Since only one index can be
    clustered per relation, choose it based on
    important queries that would benefit the most
    from clustering.

25
Examples of Indexes
SELECT E.dno FROM Emp E WHERE E.agegt40
  • B tree index on E.age can be used to get
    qualifying tuples.
  • How selective is the condition?
  • Consider the GROUP BY query.
  • If many tuples have E.age gt 10, using E.age index
    and sorting the retrieved tuples may be costly.
  • Equality queries and duplicates

SELECT E.dno, COUNT () FROM Emp E WHERE
E.agegt10 GROUP BY E.dno
SELECT E.dno FROM Emp E WHERE E.hobbyStamps
26
Indexes with Composite Search Keys
  • Composite Search Keys Search on a combination of
    fields.
  • Equality query Every field value is equal to a
    constant value. E.g. wrt ltsal,agegt index
  • age20 and sal 75
  • Range query Some field value is not a constant.
    E.g.
  • age 20 or age20 and sal gt 10
  • Data entries in index sorted by search key to
    support range queries.

Examples of composite key indexes using
lexicographic order.
11,80
11
12
12,10
name
age
sal
12,20
12
bob
10
12
13,75
13
cal
80
11
ltage, salgt
ltagegt
joe
12
20
sue
13
75
10,12
10
20
20,12
Data records sorted by name
75,13
75
80,11
80
ltsal, agegt
ltsalgt
Data entries in index sorted by ltsal,agegt
Data entries sorted by ltsalgt
27
Composite Search Keys
  • To retrieve Emp records with age30 AND sal4000,
    an index on ltage,salgt would be better than an
    index on age or an index on sal.
  • Choice of index key orthogonal to clustering etc.
  • If condition is 20ltagelt30 AND 3000ltsallt5000
  • Clustered tree index on ltage,salgt or ltsal,agegt is
    best.
  • If condition is age30 AND 3000ltsallt5000
  • Clustered ltage,salgt index much better than
    ltsal,agegt index!
  • Composite indexes are larger, updated more often.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com