Title: HIA: Theoretical foundations and practical application
1HIA Theoretical foundations and practical
application
- Erica Ison
- Specialist Practitioner in HIA
- Affiliated to the Public Health Resource Unit,
Oxford, UK
2HIA scientific methodology or management tool?
- At first sight, HIA has a schizophrenic
character. Its roles are - To provide robust evidence to support
decision-making the science part - To make tangible and practical suggestions to
support the healthiness of the design and
implementation of proposals, which includes
eliciting knowledge, experience and opinion from
a range of stakeholders some of the management
part
3Theory of HIA models of health
- There are two main models of health
- Biomedical, which describes health in terms of
illness and disease, with a focus on cure,
treatment and palliation - Social or socio-economic, which uses the
determinants of health to describe routes to
well-being, with a focus on prevention of
ill-health and health improvement
4Theory of HIA Models of HIA
- These two main models of health give rise to two
main models of HIA - Biomedical model
- Social or socio-economic model
5Models of HIA
6Which model of health do you use?
- As there are two main types of impact on health,
direct and indirect, we need to use both models
of health - Direct impacts tend to reflect the biomedical
model of health - Indirect impacts through the determinants of
health tend to reflect the social or
socio-economic model of health
7Which model of HIA do you use?
- Because we are using two models of health, we
need to use and combine the two main models of
HIA - Some practitioners prefer to use only one or
other of the models of HIA
8Which model of HIA do you use?
9How do we use both models of HIA?
- We need to achieve a balance between the two
models of HIA - This balance may be different for different HIAs
depending on - the nature of the proposal being investigated
- which aspects of health it affects
- the definition of health you are working with
- This does not mean that one model of HIA can be
ignored or neglected, even if that model does not
need to be dominant
10What balance can we achieve between the models of
HIA?
- Practical considerations
- The balance may also depend on
- The availability of information for the HIA
- Access to information for the HIA
- The resources available financial and human
- The timescale available for the HIA study
11How do we make an HIA robust?
- We use
- Tools and checklists they enable us to be
systematic - Information from different sources this enables
us to incorporate evidence and experience into
the results of the HIA - A range of methods to identify impacts on health
12HIA Tools and checklists
- A tool is structured so that it can support the
user in making a decision, that is, it gives
guidance on how to interpret any responses - A checklist is either a list of items that acts
as an aide memoire or a list of questions that
triggers a response to consider but does not give
the user guidance on how to interpret that
response
13Tools for HIA
- The use of tools in HIA ensures that the
methodology is systematic - Most tools are based around the determinants of
health, but can also include groups in the
population and the nature of the impacts - Most tools are designed for use during two stages
in the HIA process - Screening
- Appraisal
14Tools for HIA
- Many tools available, particularly for appraisal
- Most of the tools have not been validated
- Best advice when you feel confident, it is best
to develop tools that are appropriate to the
communities and conditions in the municipalities
where you work tools can be developed anew or
you can adapt tools that are already available
15Checklists for HIA
- Checklists in HIA can be designed for use
- during one stage of the process of HIA, e.g.
scoping - to undertake some of the tasks during one stage
of the HIA, e.g. process evaluation - Best advice checklists are helpful to ensure
systematic coverage of issues in the HIA, and
they are relatively easy to develop for use in
your own municipality
16Sources of Information for Appraisal in HIA
- Information for appraisal comes from several
different sources - the published literature research information
sometimes called the evidence base - other HIAs on similar proposals contains both
evidence and experience - local data and statistics quantitative and
qualitative information or evidence about the
community - stakeholder consultation, including the community
mainly knowledge, experience and informed
opinions
17What sort of information do we get from each
source?
18Methods that can be used during appraisal in HIA
- When considering the methods for HIA, there are
some fundamental decisions to take which will
determine the range of methods you can use - Will you be consulting stakeholders?
- Will you be consulting the community as one of
the groups of stakeholders?
19Methods not requiring stakeholder involvement
- Document analysis
- Literature review and assessment of the quality
of the evidence to weight the impacts - Desk-top analysis of the proposal by technicians,
possibly using Lickert scales - Mathematical or computer modelling of
quantitative data to predict health outcomes - Valuation of predicted impacts, in terms of
finance or other variables, e.g. QALYs
20Methods not requiring stakeholder involvement
- Methodological issues
- Quality of data
- Coverage of data
- Assumptions made about data
- Sensitivity analysis - assessment of
options/scenarios - Valuation and weighting
21Methods of stakeholder consultation
- Two main types of method for stakeholder
consultation - Interactive, where stakeholders can interact with
one another, e.g. focus group, workshop or open
event - Non-interactive, where stakeholders respond only
to the HIA Assessor(s), e.g. interview or survey
questionnaire
22Methods of stakeholder consultation
- Methodological Issues
- Sample size number of participants
- Representativeness of participants
- Demographics
- Socio-economics
- Special interests
- Hard-to-reach groups
23Methods Depths of Appraisal
- There are two main categories or depths of
appraisal - Rapid
- Comprehensive
- The defining feature between the two is whether
new information is generated - When the best available information is used, and
no new information is generated rapid - Primary research is undertaken and new
information is generated comprehensive
24HIA on Londons Mayoral Strategies
- Mayor of London has made a political commitment
to conducting HIA on all the mayoral strategies - HIAs are undertaken by the London Health
Commission, which is independent, for the Mayor
of London - London Health Commission submits HIA results to
the Mayor, the Greater London Assembly and the
team responsible for the strategy
25HIA on Londons Mayoral Strategies
- Transport
- Economic development
- Spatial development
- Waste management
- Noise
- Energy
- Biodiversity
- Air quality
- Culture
- Older people
26HIA on Londons Mayoral Strategies
- Preparation
- Scoping the main topic areas of the strategy that
the HIA will focus on - Literature review of potential impacts on health
and effective interventions relating to the
strategy - Appraisal
- Rapid appraisal techniques used
- HIA stakeholder workshop before public
consultation period stakeholders from the
private, public and voluntary sectors no
community - Reporting the results
27HIA on Londons Mayoral Strategies
- Questions for the stakeholder workshop on the
Noise Strategy - What parts of the strategy need to be kept on the
basis of the impacts on peoples health and
well-being? How can we increase those positive
effects? - What parts of the strategy need to be changed
because of their impacts on health and
well-being? How can we change the proposal to
reduce/avoid those negative effects? - What could be added to the strategy to promote
health and well-being?
28Evaluation of HIA on Londons Mayoral Strategies
-
- The HIAs have raised awareness of the social
model of health and public health amongst those
whose primary roles are not health related Most
importantly they have influenced strategy. - Opinion Leader Research, 2002