The MidTerm Review of the 10th EDF - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

The MidTerm Review of the 10th EDF

Description:

none – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: eurores
Category:
Tags: 10th | edf | midterm | review

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The MidTerm Review of the 10th EDF


1
The Mid-Term Review of the 10th EDF
  • Information package for SRHR and Health advocates
    in the Global South

2
Content
  • Overview the EDF, CSPs, NIPs
  • The Mid-Term Review (MTR)
  • Advocacy Opportunities
  • Action Points (at the EU and national level)

3
Overview
What are the EDF, CSPs, and NIPs?
4
The European Development Fund (EDF)
Overview
  • Main instrument for European Community (EC)
    development aid to the ACP (Africa-Caribbean-Pacif
    ic)
  • The 10th EDF (current) period is from 2008-2013
  • It has a total budget of 22.8 billion Euro
  • Allocation of money per country depends on
    Country Strategy Papers (CSPs) main strategic
    tool for programming EU assistance

5
Country Strategy Papers (CSP)
Overview
  • Their purpose
  • To define the EC strategy for countries receiving
    external assistance
  • Ensure a match between political priorities and
    spending on development assistance

Image source Republic of Kenya and European
Community, Country Strategy Paper and Indicative
Programme for the period 2008-2013, cover page
6
CSPs include two main sections
Overview
  • An analysis of the political, economic, social
    and environmental situation in your country as
    well as a description of past cooperation with
    the EC.
  • A
  • A National Indicative Programme (NIP) stating the
    amount of aid allocated to your country and the
    specific focal and non-focal sectors that EC aid
    will be supporting.

Image source Republic of Kenya and European
Community, Country Strategy Paper and Indicative
Programme for the period 2008-2013, page 32
7
CSPs
Overview
  • Are developed in collaboration with national
    governments, EU Member States, other donors and
    with civil society

8
NIPs
Overview
  • Cover a period of 3-5 years
  • Specify global objectives, specific objectives
    and expected results for each area
  • Include
  • Mainstreaming of cross cutting issues
  • Implementation modalities
  • Financial envelopes for each cooperation area
    including the indicative timing and size of each
    amount of the ECs contribution.

Image source Republic of Kenya and European
Community, Country Strategy Paper and Indicative
Programme for the period 2008-2013, pages 32 45
9
Why are CSPs and NIPs important for us?
Overview
  • In knowing the CSP and NIP, you have the
    opportunity to strengthen your position as
    government partners
  • National governments now have more responsibility
    in allocation decisions, since they receive more
    money through Budget Support

10
The Mid-Term Review
What is the MTR, why is it important?
11
What is the MTR?
The Mid-Term Review
  • In 2009 and 2010, a Mid-Term Review (MTR) of all
    CSPs takes place
  • The MTR is a key moment for an overall review of
    EU cooperation with your country
  • It offers a good opportunity for Civil Society
    actors to raise relevant concerns and influence
    the negotiations
  • The MTR is a national process!

12
Objectives of the MTR
The Mid-Term Review
  • To review and adapt the CSPs, if needed (to
    provide additional support in the country where
    needed)
  • To introduce new objectives into the CSP to
    reflect changing conditions in your country
  • To reallocate funding, if necessary
  • MTR Timeline
  • National level consultations June 15
    2009-October 15 2009
  • After being pushed forward the process is now
    delayed

13
Dimensions of the assessment
The Mid-Term Review
  • Governance situation To what extent was the
    governance action plan implemented and has the
    situation improved?
  • Economic situation Are sound economic policies
    in place, and are they conducive to strong and
    sustainable economic growth?
  • Poverty and social situation Are sound social
    policies in place to make progress in reducing
    poverty and achieving the MDGs?
  • Performance in implementing EC cooperation Have
    EC projects, programmes and Budget Support
    contributed sufficiently to sector/general
    development results?

14
Problems with the previous MTR
The Mid-Term Review
  • Technical
  • Lack of transparency and inclusiveness
  • Poor involvement of CSOs in the process
  • Timeline was too short
  • Content
  • Health is rarely recognised as a priority issue
    of EC funding, especially in ACP countries
  • SRH issues are not prioritised for funding in EC
    response strategy
  • Social issues such as HIV/AIDS and gender are
    only recognised as cross-cutting (no money)

15
Advocacy Opportunities
Why and how to get involved
16
Why should we act?
Advocacy Opportunities
  • Your actions at this stage can help guarantee
    that civil society concerns are raised during the
    MTR!
  • This is an opportunity!
  • to start discussions on SRH involving donors,
    government and civil society
  • to practice south-north advocacy
  • to get in contact with important actors in your
    country
  • Work on the MTR could also prepare for the next
    EDF!

17
Working in Partnership
Advocacy Opportunities
  • Advocacy efforts to influence the CSPs through
    the MTR should happen at two levels
    simultaneously
  • 1. At the EU level in Brussels
  • 2. At the National level in your country
  • It is important to join forces in order to
    achieve change and better investments in health!

18
Action Points
What can be done
19
At the EU level
Action Points
  • In order to assist you in the MTR process, DSW
    will
  • Prepare a summary of your countrys CSP relevant
    to health, SRH and HIV/AIDS
  • Provide relevant contact details of the EC
    delegations
  • Keep you informed about the timeline and
    activities of the MTR
  • Prepare recommendations to strengthen the CSPs
    that you can send to EC delegation staff
  • Put pressure on the EC in Brussels to keep the
    consultation process transparent and inclusive

20
At the National level
Action Points
  • You can do the following to assist this process
  • Send the same recommendations developed in
    Brussels to the EC delegations in your country
  • Get in contact with other NGOs/CSOs working on
    health issues in the MTR in your country
  • Contact the civil society liaison officer in the
    EC Delegation to get information about the health
    assessment and MTR timeline
  • Ask to be put on their mailing lists and to be
    invited to events and consultations

21
At the National level
Action Points
  • You can
  • Develop recommendations jointly with local civil
    society
  • Provide suggestions on how to integrate/mainstream
    SRH and HIV/AIDS into the priority sectors of
    the CSPs
  • Show the potential impact of the economic crises
    on universal access in your country
  • Strengthen relations with the EC delegations in
    your country, which can be strategic to influence
    future EU programming and funding
  • Your knowledge of the national situation is
    needed!

22
Contact
  • For more information, please visit us at
  • http//www.euroresources.org
  • DSW Brussels
  • 2-3 Place du Luxembourg
  • 1050 Brussels
  • Belgium
  • Telephone 32 2/504/9060
  • Email matthias.brucker_at_dsw-brussels.org
  • anne.wittenberg_at_dsw-brussels.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com