Title: Detector Considerations EIC
1Detector Considerations _at_EIC
Rolf Ent, eA Meeting _at_ BNL, 05/07/05
Here, we will only discuss a multi-purpose
high-luminosity ep detector, not a dedicated
lower-luminosity ep/eA detector as suggested by
Allen Caldwell et al. At present, potential
high-luminosity eA studies have not been
integrated into these considerations yet, we hope
to start the MC simulations for eA after this
meeting! The following slides are only a working
document for discussions, they are the summary
of the last EIC Monte Carlo Group meeting,
presently only drafted by Antje, Abhay, and me.
- Open Charm Production
- Electron Detection
- Flavor Decomposition
- Questions/To Do
2Detector Considerations _at_EIC
- Open Charm Production
- Dominant reaction mechanism through glue at small
x ? e/ion momentum mismatch not so relevant and
created nearly at rest ? Decay products at large
angles. Need to determine angle range. - Background reduction critical issue ? requires
lt100 m vertex resolution ? drives vertex detector - Decay products have typical momenta between 0-2
GeV ? Need good particle id in this region and
good track capability in large rate region ? GEM
layers as TPC would work, use dE/dx plus TOF of
hodoscope (with 100 ps timing resolution, 3.2
meters gives 3s p/K separation) - HERA typical momentum cutoff of 5 GeV, studies
show can push down to Field (in Tesla) of
Solenoid. STAR has only 0.5 T field and lower
cut-off of 0.4 GeV ? Need low T (about 0.5)
magnetic field in central region.
3Detector Considerations _at_EIC - II
- Electron Detection
- Do we need momentum determination through
magnetic field or can one simply use this to
determine charge-sign and rely on high-resolution
calorimetry (PbWO4?). Needs to be determined from
simple kinematic arguments and (as quantitative
example) from QCD analysis. - A solenoid has implications for the highest
luminosity one can reach in the IR, as it acts as
a (de-)focusing element for the electrons/ions.
Could one use a torus instead? For a solenoid,
the lower the field (0.5T?) the better, should
we only cover the IR of relevance (10-30 cm?). In
general reduce ?B.dl along beam axis. - How can we accomplish small angle electron
scattering? Is placing E.M. calorimeters all
around the ring o.k., like in the Muon/g-2 ring?
What x-Q2 resolution/coverage?
4Detector Considerations _at_EIC - III
- Flavor Decomposition
- Need comfortable z cut (gt 0.2?) for reliable
flavor decomposition ? This gives pions/kaons of
a few GeV or higher. What pion/kaon momenta
range? - Probably do need reasonable momentum resolution
and charge-sign determination ? is a larger field
(solenoid or other) needed outside the central
region? What resolution is needed? - DES processes likely drive hadron resolutions
required. - Analysis with purity matrices should show to what
extent p/K identification is a requirement (note
that it is likely that DES processes drive the
p/K requirements). - Urgently need momentum/angle distributions of
particles associated with physics processes of
interest!!!
5Detector Considerations _at_EIC - Questions
- Can one get away with a small length inner vertex
detector to only cover the bunch crossing? - Does one need a composite field structure (0.5T
in inner region, step function more radially out?
PHENIX). - Is PbWO4 and a 0.5 T solenoid field sufficient
for electron resolutions? Could we use a toroidal
field? - What momentum resolutions are required for
few-GeV/c pions/kaons? What field would be needed
for this? - Is a gap in p/K identification acceptable for the
intermediate hadron momenta (2-5? GeV/c)? - Are EM calorimeters all around the ring
sufficient for very-small angle electron
detection? - What are the implications of a 100 mr crossing
angle? (relevant for ELIC only)