AIPLAFICPI COLLOQUIUM - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

AIPLAFICPI COLLOQUIUM

Description:

Charles E. Van Horn. AIPLA. 18 November 2001. 2. Points To Be Addressed. Current situation ... Problems caused by backlogs. Opportunities created by backlogs. 3 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: aip8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AIPLAFICPI COLLOQUIUM


1
AIPLA/FICPI COLLOQUIUM
Charles E. Van Horn AIPLA 18 November 2001
2
Points To Be Addressed
  • Current situation
  • Problems caused by backlogs
  • Opportunities created by backlogs

3
Recent Statistics USPTO
  • Year UPR Filed Patents Staff Pend
  • 1990 163,571 89,551 1699 18.3
  • 1995 221,304 102,579 2006 19.2
  • 2000 293,344 165,504 2905 25.0

4
Patents in Force ()
  • Years from Grants
  • 4 84 (89 Lg., 71 Sm.)
  • 8 60 (66 Lg., 43 Sm.)
  • 12 40 (44 Lg., 24 Sm.)

5
Recent Changes Under AIPA
  • 18-month publication for most (90) patent
    applications filed after November 28, 2000
  • Patent term adjustment (EXTENSION)for certain
    processing delays in USPTO for applications
    filed after May 28, 2000.

6
Problems/Opportunities of Backlogs Depends on
Several Factors
  • Field of invention
  • Type of invention
  • Applicants priorities
  • Investors
  • Public
  • Representatives

7
Problems Delay of Patent Grant
  • Delayed investment
  • Missed opportunities
  • Delay in ability to enforce exclusivity
  • Disproportionate impact on small entities

8
Problems Uncertainty
  • USPTO role shifted to public to predict whether a
    patent will issue and scopeof claims
  • Continuation application practice(FY 98-00
    14.7, 16.7, 18.8)

9
Problems Delays In Creating Prior Art Under
102(e)
  • 102(e) published U.S. application and patent
    effective as prior art as of U.S. filing date for
    BOTH novelty and inventive step.

10
Problems 102(e) Prior Art
  • 500,000 U.S. applications pending on November
    28, 2000
  • 10 of applications filed after November 28
    request non-publication

11
Opportunities For Applicants
  • Defer cost of examination
  • Test market
  • Develop invention
  • Higher quality search/examination
  • Potential benefit of patent term adjustment

12
Opportunities Term Adjustment
  • Categories of delay
  • Delayed acts of examination
  • 3-year pendency rule (FY01 87)
  • Interference (FY00 136 declared)
  • Secrecy Order
  • Successful Appeal (FY00 63)

13
Opportunities Delayed Acts of Examination
  • 14 months to first action (75)
  • 4 months to act on reply (98)
  • 4 months to act after Board/Court decision (84)
  • 4 months to issue patent after issuefee paid
    (92)

14
Problems
  • Patent term adjustment shall be reduced for
    failure to engage in reasonable efforts to
    conclude prosecution e.g., failure to respond
    to an Office action within 3 months.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com