Psychophysics of Pain: Some Insights for Understanding Pain - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Psychophysics of Pain: Some Insights for Understanding Pain

Description:

There is a lawful dependence of pain sensation on stimulus intensity. In everyday life, pain intensity is proportional to the force of the blow, to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: alg1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Psychophysics of Pain: Some Insights for Understanding Pain


1
Psychophysics of PainSome Insights for
Understanding Pain
  • Daniel Algom
  • Department of Psychology

In honor of Professor Harvey Babkoff
2
The Puzzle of Pain Is It a Puzzle?
  • The puzzle Pain is associated with a host of
    emotional motivational and cultural factors.
  • The puzzle A stimulus causing intolerable pain
    on one occasion might go hardly noticed on
    another.
  • The puzzle Pain can be crippling following
    noxious stimuli, but may fail to occur after
    extensive tissue injury.

3
The Puzzle of Pain
  • The puzzle Pain may persist after all the
    injured tissue has been healed or removed.
  • The puzzle Morphine is more effective in
    reducing clinical pain than reducing pain in the
    laboratory, but the opposite holds with respect
    to placebo.

4
What is Pain?
  • Given the current preoccupation with the
    physiological, biological, and neural substrates
    associated with pain, it cannot be overemphasized
    that pain is a perceptual experience, not a
    neural reaction.
  • The verbal report is the sole genuine expression
    of human pain.

5
Livingston, 1953, pp. 68-69
  • what counts most with my patient and what counts
    with me as his physician is the amount of pain he
    feels. When a patient needs a surgical operation
    and asks me to perform it, he does not ask how
    deeply the knife will cut, nor would he be
    concerned if I were to tell him that pain signals
    would continue to traverse his nervous system
    after he had gone to sleep. What he asks is, How
    much it will hurt me? He is really asking, how
    much of the inevitable tissue injury he will
    consciously experience as pain

6
Drawbacks of the Puzzle
  • Tendency to focus on the unique, bizarre and
    paradoxical phenomena.
  • Paucity of research/discussion on the measurement
    of the magnitude of pain.
  • Limited role to psychophysics of pain. It has
    been dubbed farcical in its wild variability,
    denying a relation between stimulus intensity and
    pain intensity.
  • Wall, 1979

7
In Fact
  • Pain sensitivity is more uniform than that of the
    common senses.
  • There is a lawful dependence of pain sensation on
    stimulus intensity.
  • In everyday life, pain intensity is proportional
    to the force of the blow, to the heat of the
    iron, to the pressure of the sound, or the depth
    of the wound.

8
Livingston, 1943, 1953
  • In the majority of instances, pain is
    proportional to the injury (1953, pp. 64).
  • We wonder why some insignificant-looking scar
    should give severe pain, or why serious injury is
    not noticed in the excitement of the automobile
    accident

9
Therefore
  • It is the lawfulness of the stimulus-response
    relationship that enables the puzzle of pain to
    emerge in the first place.
  • In the absence of a proportional pain sensation
    there would not have been a puzzle to ponder.
  • The exceptions subsumed under he puzzle are
    important, but they are exceptions nonetheless.

10
Hardy, Wolff Goodell (1940-1955)
  • The Dolorimeter Applying the heat of a 500
    1000 watt lamp on a small area of the skin.
  • Absolute threshold (N 150, Age 14-74) 220
    millicalories per second per square centimeter.
  • All observations within 5 of this value.

11
Pain Perception vs. Reaction
  • Sensitivity vs Mood Pain threshold measured
    daily over the period of several months while
    recording mood and emotion.
  • Mood exhibited wide variation, but the threshold
    remained constant.
  • Sensitivity vs Fatigue Pain threshold measured
    after sleep deprivation of 24 hours and/or at
    2-hour intervals.
  • Subjective well-being, alertness, and fatigue
    varied considerably but the threshold remained
    constant.

12
Pain Perception vs. Reaction
  • Independence of threshold and GSR Over a two
    months period both were measured on a daily
    basis.
  • GSR reflecting alarm, anxiety, or stress
    changed considerably, but the threshold remained
    constant.

13
Pain Perception vs. Reaction
  • Distraction and suggestion can alter (elevate)
    pain threshold.
  • Reading an adventure story.
  • Repeating digits forward or backward.
  • Clanging a loud bell concurrently with pain.
  • Autosuggestion - having the person convince
    herself than she could not feel pain.
  • Each of these manipulations acted to raise
    threshold (approximately by 15).

14
Suprathreshold Pain - The Dol Scale
Number of JNDs
Stimulus Intensity (mcal/sec/cm2)
15
The Dol Scale Arithmetic Properties
  • The method of fractionation The scale erected on
    the basis of judgments of fraction agreed with
    the Dol Scale.
  • The Dol Scale has ratio properties. A 4-dol pain
    feels twice intense as a 2-dol pain.
  • The sum of 2 JNDs ( 1 dol) represented the same
    difference in all parts of the Dol Scale.
  • Pain in dols is associative.

16
The Dol Scale Arithmetic Properties
  • The numbers on the Dol Scale, representing the
    intensity of pain,
  • are capable of being added and divided according
    to the ordinary rules of arithmetic, and it is
    possible to define two dols as both the sum of a
    two 1-dol stimuli and as one-fifths of the
    ceiling pain.
  • It is proper also to speak of one pain as being
    either twice as strong as another or as
    equivalent in intensity to the sum of two smaller
    pains.
  • Hardy, Wolff Goodell (1948)

17
Cross Modality Matching of Pain (Hardy, Wolff
Goodell, 1952)
18
Contemporary Pain Psychophysics
  • Integrating multiple pains
  • (Algom, Raphaeli Cohen-Raz, 1986, 1987)

Estimated pain
Shock intensity (mA)
19
Integrating Auditory, Visual, and Electric Pain.
(Algom Meidler, 1990)
Electric Intensity1(mA)
Electric Intensity2(mA)
Estimated pain
Visual intensity (Candlepower)
Visual intensity
Auditory Intensity (SPL)
Auditory Intensity
Electric Intensity5 (mA)
Electric Intensity3 (mA)
Electric Intensity4 (mA)
Estimated pain
Visual intensity
Visual intensity
Visual intensity
Auditory Intensity
Auditory Intensity
Auditory Intensity
20
Memory and Perception for Labor Pain (Algom
Lubel, 1994)
21
Integration of Perceptual, Remembered and Mental
Pain.(Algom Lindenberg, 1991)
Mental
Remembered
Perceived
Pain Estimates
Shock intensity (mA)
Shock intensity (mA)
Shock intensity (mA)
22
Thank you!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com