Agronomic, Ecological, and Economic Tradeoffs Among Different Dryland Organic Transition Cropping Sy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Agronomic, Ecological, and Economic Tradeoffs Among Different Dryland Organic Transition Cropping Sy

Description:

Agronomic, Ecological, and Economic Tradeoffs Among Different Dryland Organic Transition Cropping Sy – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: amanda121
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Agronomic, Ecological, and Economic Tradeoffs Among Different Dryland Organic Transition Cropping Sy


1
Agronomic, Ecological, and Economic Trade-offs
Among Different Dryland Organic Transition
Cropping Systems
Robert Gallagher A. Snyder, D. Pittmann, R.
Koenig, K. Painter, H. Hinman, J.
Johnson-Maynard, E. Fuerst and I. Burke

2
(No Transcript)
3
Transitioning to Organic
  • Limited availability of inputs
  • More pests
  • Lower yields
  • No price incentives

4
How Organic? versus Why Organic?
  • Manage Weeds
  • Soil Fertility and Quality
  • Crop Productivity and Quality
  • Economic returns
  • Transition phase
  • Certified organic

5
Farming on the Palouse
http//agsci.oregonstate.edu/aaa/2006/M61-PalouseS
pring_400.jpg
6
Assumptions and Criteria
  • Minimize or eliminate inversion tillage
  • Legume-based N fertility
  • Limited availability of animal manures
  • High cost of commercial organic fertilizer
  • 16-18 rainfall zone (fall and winter)

7
Experimental Transition Systems
8
General Agronomic Plan
  • 1-2x pre-plant rotary harrow
  • 20 above standard seeding rates
  • Standard crop varieties with no seed treatment
  • Direct-seeded
  • Biogrow gypsum 7 lb N, 15 lb P,K,S
  • 3-5x in-crop rotary hoe

9
(No Transcript)
10
Sweep Plow
11
Rotary harrow
12
Rotary Hoe
13
(No Transcript)
14
Pre-Transition History
  • Conventional tillage winter wheat
  • Fall chisel plowed (2002)
  • Spring disk/harrow (2003)
  • Numerous bindweed patches

15
LSD 5
up slope
down slope
Note Inorganic N (0-152 cm) ranged from 47 to 59
kg/ha
16
up slope
down slope
17
Transition Year 12003
18
Transition Year 1 - 2003
       
19
Transition Year 22004
20
(No Transcript)
21
Best and Worst Case ScenariosJuly 2004
Winter Wheat Following Spring Peas
Winter Wheat Following Fava GM
22
(No Transcript)
23
Transition Year 2 (2004)Green Manure and Forage
Crops
Alfalfa/Pea/Oat Forage (6944 kg/ha)
Winter Pea Green Manure (3360 kg/ha)
24
Transition Year 32005
25
(No Transcript)
26
Note all spring peas mowed Prior to pod set in
2005
27
2005Transition Year 3 Crop Yields
  • Spring Barley 201 kg/ha
  • Forage 6800 kg/ha
  • Winter Pea Green Manure 5373 kg/ha
  • _at_ 3 N 160 kg N / ha
  • Spring Pea crop failure (green manure)
  • Weeds, insects and disease

28
(No Transcript)
29
1st Year Certifiable Organic 2006
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
Hard Red Spring Wheat
Soft White Spring Wheat
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(assumes a organic wheat price of 6.00/bu)
37
Organic Winter Wheat - 2007
38
(No Transcript)
39
Optimal Transition System?
40
Transitioning to Organic in the Eastern
Washington Summary
  • Harrow/hoe-based direct seeding seems feasible
  • Legume/grass forage has good potential
  • P supply??
  • Winter legume green manure promising
  • Winter Pea
  • Common or Hairy Vetch (10 lb/A seeding rate)
  • No direct evidence of differences in organic N
  • Winter Wheat vs Spring Wheat
  • Spring peas are problematic variety development
    needed
  • Perennial weed issues
  • Bindweed and Canadian thistle

41
2005 Winter Pea Vetch Varieties
Kg N / Ha
42
Management of Bindweed, Canada Thistle and
Prickly Lettuce
43
Acknowledgements
  • Funding
  • USDA Organic Transitions Program
  • Small Planet Foods
  • WSU BioAg Program
  • Pat Les Boyd Land Owners
  • Research Assistants
  • Maria Lockhart, Adam Berglund, Suzanne Kopan,
    Lori Hoagland

44
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com