The purposeful, scholarly and reflective professional - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

The purposeful, scholarly and reflective professional

Description:

Work with riparians and lake users to enhance their understanding of watershed management and inland lakes water quality issues ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: SCU95
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The purposeful, scholarly and reflective professional


1
The purposeful, scholarly and reflective
professional
  • New AoE goals to help us get there.

Water Quality AoE Meeting May 10, 2004
2
MSUE EIS
  • http//www.msue.msu.edu/eis/

3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
Former goals (for EIS reporting)
  • Work with riparians and lake users to enhance
    their understanding of watershed management and
    inland lakes water quality issues
  • Help MI farmers improve nutrient management to
    maintain and improve quality of ground and
    surface water
  • Encourage protection of community groundwater
    supplies through wellhead protection education in
    collaboration with state agency personnel and
    local communities
  • Improve onsite and decentralized wastewater
    treatment and design by educating and training
    health officials, consultants, engineers and
    riparians
  • Encourage MI citizens to adopt or refine
    practices to protect water quality on their
    homesteads and in their communities
  • Improve citizen access to and understanding of
    water quality information and expertise
  • Enhance links with other groups and organizations
    working on water quality issues
  • Public Policy in this area

7
Proposed goals for easier EIS reporting (1of2)
  • Statewide Goals (what we want to achieve by doing
    activities)Increase awareness of surface
    water and groundwater resourcesIncrease
    behaviors that protect the integrity of surface
    water and groundwater resources Prevent
    degradation of groundwater and surface water
    resourcesImprove the integrity of groundwater
    and surface water resources

8
Proposed goals for easier EIS reporting (2of2)
  • Enabling Goals (related to how we go about doing
    things) Develop educational/outreach
    materialsProvide trainingEmpower local
    community leadersImprove citizen access to
    water quality information and expertiseProvide
    web-based water quality resourceEstablish
    collaboration with other groups working on water
    quality

9
These goals can apply to any of the 4-Ps
  • Programs/projects
  • Products
  • Professional development
  • Proposals for AoE funding

10
Applying the EIS logic model to get us there
  • Be purposeful, scholarly and reflective
  • Audience?
  • Inputs (resources) needed?
  • Outputs (4-P specific activities)?
  • Short-term outcome?
  • Intermediate-term outcome?
  • Long-term outcome?

11
MSUE EIS Logic Model
  • http//www.msue.msu.edu/eis/

12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
A program exampleVolunteer Stream Monitoring
  • Audience?
  • Citizens interested in becoming volunteer stream
    monitors
  • Short-term outcome? (awareness, behavior)
  • Increased
  • Knowledge of basic stream science and wq
    parameters
  • Appreciation of good study design
  • Ability to choose appropriate methods
  • Skill in using a variety of methods
  • Intermediate-term outcome? (behavior)
  • Create a pool of volunteers to supplement and
    sustain TMDL data needs
  • Contribute to research projects
  • Performance and usability of a variety of
    volunteer methods
  • Reliability of volunteer generated data at
    various levels of training
  • Training and equipment recommendations (for
    individuals, groups and MCWC)
  • Long-term outcome? (integrity)
  • Credible volunteer generated data with the
    potential to supplement professional data
  • Practice and policy changes
  • Improved water quality

Missing Inputs and Outcomes
15
A Professional development exampleMSUE Policy
In-Service
  • Input time
  • Output
  • activity visit state capitol scheduled visits
    with legislators on my own
  • factor time to work on my own to organize
    apriori
  • participation me, MSUE peers, legislators,
    legislative staff
  • factor other peoples schedules and availability

16
Applicable State AoE Goal Prevent Degradation
  • Outcomes/Impact (from EIS logic model)
  • immediate understand the policy structure and
    process (awareness)
  • indicator ability to identify key committees and
    contacts for water quality policy
  • intermediate apply my understanding to AOE
    activities (awareness, training, collaboration)
  • indicator ability to bring together AOE with key
    staff/committee on particular issue e.g. water
    withdrawal or stream discharge
  • long term transfer my knowledge to public for
    decisionmaking (empower leaders/improve access)
  • indicator ability for public to explain and
    utilize process to change water resource policy

17

A product example Water Quality AOE Web
Page
  • Output
  • - Design and creation of a functional web page
    that is useful to the AOE, other AOEs and the
    general public
  • Immediate Outcomes
  • - Ready access to what AOE members are doing how
    to get involved with AOE
  • Indicator number of hits, number of new members
    on the list serve
  • Intermediate Outcomes
  • - Build upon existing programs
  • - Link with other projects within and between
    states
  • Indicators interaction with manure AOE, MAEAP,
    GWSP, Regional WQ team
  • Long-term outcomes
  • - Portal to water quality information
    educational materials
  • - Up to date web site of current projects
    information
  • - Other groups link their web page to it

18
Being reflective about the May 4-5, 2004
Volunteer Stream Monitoring program
  • EIS logic model asks for Inputs and Outputs and
    provides a framework for reflecting on what weve
    done and how wed like to improve it. As the
    organizers discussed changes wed like to see,
    the additional inputs/resources needed become
    more clear.
  • New Inputs (resources) to this program? Not sure
    yet.
  • New Outputs (activities) from this program? What
    do we want to change?
  • So far, we know for sure we want to rearrange the
    WQ standards and parameters presentation and make
    it more interactive. To do that we will need the
    following resources (new inputs)
  • More time on the agenda
  • Time to come up an interactive experience v. a
    lecture experience
  • More visuals of examples of water quality
    situations participants may encounter and relate
    what parameters may be involved and how the
    standards may apply to the situation.
  • Outcomes (does this change anything? For now)
  • Short-term outcome? Increased
  • Knowledge of basic stream science and wq
    parameters
  • Appreciation of good study design
  • Ability to choose appropriate methods
  • Skill in using a variety of methods
  • Understanding of how parameters and standards
    apply to real world situations

Applicable proposed State and Enabling AoE goals
Increase
behaviors Provide Improve
training
(Thoughts from flip chart scribblings and
dribblings from May 10 meeting)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com