Master Implementation Sequencing Plan Status Briefing March 2004

1
Master Implementation Sequencing Plan
(MISP) WRAC CERP Program Requirements Issue
Team June 21, 2004 Juan Diaz-Carreras
SFWMD Joe Redican USACE
2
MISP Banding

• MISP defines the order in which the CERP
  projects will be planned, designed, and
  constructed
• Banding is the grouping of those products and
  projects to be accomplished within specific time
  periods (5 years) as defined by the MISP
• The purpose of Banding is to focus our limited
  resources on the priority products that can be
  accomplished and generate the expected benefits
  within the specified timeframe

3
Master Implementation Sequencing Plan (MISP)

• Programmatic regulations require completion by
  December 13, 2004
• Needed to support development of interim goals
  and targets
• Programmatic regulations require projects to be
  sequenced and scheduled to maximize achievement
  of goals and purposes of Plan at earliest
  possible time and in most cost-efficient way,
  including achievement of interim goals and
  targets
• MISP will include discussion of logic,
  constraints, and other parameters used in
  developing the sequencing and scheduling of
  projects

4
History Current Status

• April 1999 Comprehensive Plan laid out the
  initial MISP for CERP
• June 2001 First Update Completed
• June 2002 Draft prepared, but not finalized
• Current draft is the starting point for the
  development of the MISP update per the
  Programmatic Regs
• Current Draft forms the initial starting point
  for development of Interim Goals

5
Master Implementation Sequencing Plan Development
Component Packaging Review
Today
Incremental Modeling Runs (Bands)
RECOVER Evaluation Of Model Runs
MISP 1.0
Project Sequencing Review
Task Duration Review
MISp 2.0
Schedule Leveling Review
Phase 2
Phase 1
6
Master Implementation Sequencing Plan Development

• Review Comprehensive Plan Components, ID known
  changes and provide qualitative analysis of
  benefits expected from individual projects
• Review technical relationships of project
  sequencing to ensure compliance with Savings
  Clause, Next added increment and other
  legislation
• Determine and document durations of individual
  subtasks and evaluate effects of SFWMDs
  acceleration of certain projects
• Examine available and expected agency resources
  and compare to expected need

7
MISP Band 1 PIRs and PPDRs Complete by 2010

• North Palm Beach County
• Biscayne Bay Coastal Wetlands
• Palm Beach Ag Reserve Reservoir
• Acme Basin B
• Strazzulla Wetlands
• Winsberg Farms Restoration
• Lakes Park Restoration
• ASR Pilots
• L-31 Seepage Pilot

• Indian River Lagoon - South
• Picayune Strand (SGGE)
• EAA Reservoir
• Lake Okeechobee Watershed
• C-111 Spreader
• Hillsboro Site 1 Impoundment
• Broward Cty WPA
• C-43 Reservoir
• WCA 3A Decomp Part 1

8
MISP Band 1 Construction Complete by 2010

• C-111 Spreader
• ASR Pilots
• L-31 Seepage Pilot
• C-44 Reservoir
• EAA Reservoir
• Picayune Strand (SGGE)
• Hillsboro Site 1 Impoundment
• Decomp Tamiami Trail
• Acme Basin B

9
CERP
10
Proposed Presentation for Ecosystem Response
Surface Water Storage Reservoir
Stormwater Treatment Area(STAs)
Aquifer Storage Recovery
Seepage Management
Removing Barriers to Sheetflow
Other
11
Next Steps

• RECOVER will work with Draft MISP and Banding
  to identify
• benefits and shortfalls
• Input will be obtained from stakeholders
• and general public on draft plan and impacts
• Final MISP and Banding will be developed
  consistent with the Programmatic Regulations

12
Questions?