Constitutional Law November 9, 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Constitutional Law November 9, 2004

Description:

Constitutional Law. November 9, 2004. Equal Protection & Due Process. Fundamental Rights ... Does Degree of Impairment Matter? Suggestion in Energy Reserves ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:14
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: rle
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Constitutional Law November 9, 2004


1
Constitutional Law November 9, 2004
  • Equal Protection Due Process
  • Fundamental Rights
  • Death and Dying
  • Other Fundamental Rights
  • Economic Rights
  • Introduction
  • DP EP
  • Contracts Clause
  • Takings (Tomorrow)

2
Recap
  • EP FR
  • Travel
  • Shapiro (FR SS)
  • Saenz (Components and Sources)
  • Voting
  • Qualifications
  • Dilution
  • Bush v. Gore
  • Access to Court

3
5. Baselines Revisited
  • Burdens and DP
  • EP Relative Treatment
  • Suspect Classifications
  • FR?
  • Denial of Benefits as an EP Burden?
  • Shapiro Access to Court
  • Vs. Maher, Harris, and Rust
  • Implications

4
G. Economic Rights1. Introduction
  • Constitutional Provisions
  • DP EP
  • K Clause
  • Takings
  • Historical Overview
  • Lochner era
  • Post New Deal Tolerance
  • Renewed Interest?
  • Baselines

5
c. Baselines
  • Common Law Baselines
  • Laissez Faire Economic Theory
  • Regulation Interferes With Rights
  • No Baselines
  • Social Construction of Property
  • Regulation Defines Rights
  • Expectations Baseline
  • Protect Reasonable Reliance
  • Retroactive Effects Violate Rights

6
2. DP EP
  • Rational Basis Test
  • Any Plausible Purpose
  • Very Loose Fit w/Means
  • Williamson Epitomizes Deference
  • Anticompetitive Regulation (cf. Ferguson)
  • Poor fit with Purposes
  • Rent Seeking and Economic Rights
  • Retroactivity Issues (Romein)

7
3. K Clause
  • Historical Background
  • Debtor Relief Laws
  • Early Decisions
  • Convergence w/DP
  • Framework
  • Substantial Impairment of K
  • W/in Police Power?
  • Problem of State Ks

8
3.b.i. Impairment
  • Contractual Obligation
  • Must Be a K
  • Obligation Impaired (Romein) (link)
  • Retroactive Effect
  • Prospective Laws Beyond Scope
  • Implications of Prior Regulation
  • Does Degree of Impairment Matter?
  • Suggestion in Energy Reserves
  • Later Retreat (Keystone)

9
3.b.ii. Police Power
  • Incidental to Valid Purpose
  • Rationale for RB Inquiry
  • Ks Cannot Estop Police Power
  • Implied Condition of Every Contract
  • Energy Reserves
  • Protect Consumers Against High Prices
  • Correct Market Imbalance

10
3.c. State Ks
  • W/in K Clause
  • United States Trust
  • Restriction on Bonds re Use of Tolls
  • Statute vs. Contract
  • Necessity Reasonableness
  • Alternative Means Not Necessary
  • No Changed Circumstances Not Reasonable

11
Romein
  • Benefit Coordination
  • Applied Retroactively by Courts
  • Reversed by Statute
  • Business Required to Refund
  • Substantial Impairment
  • Employment Ks
  • Benefit Coordination not Implied Term
  • Not Law At time of K
  • Doesnt Relate to Enforceability
  • Due Process Retroactivity RB

Back
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com