Competition Policy, Competition Law, and Development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Competition Policy, Competition Law, and Development

Description:

Indirect effects: competition law affects the degree of inter-firm rivalry, ... a set of minimum standards for a small set of competition law-related matters ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: simone1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Competition Policy, Competition Law, and Development


1
Competition Policy, Competition Law, and
Development
  • Dr. Simon J. Evenett
  • World Trade Institute
  • Bern, Switzerland
  • simon.evenett_at_wti.org and www.wti.org

2
Agenda
  • Competition policy objectives and instruments
  • Barriers to entry, FDI, and imports
  • Competition law instruments
  • Competition, inter-firm rivalry, and development
  • Spread of competition law
  • Effects of competition law on economic
    performance
  • Effects on dynamic economic performance
  • Cartel enforcement in developing economies
  • Initiatives at the international level
  • Enforcement actions against international cartels
  • UNCTAD, OECD, WTO, and ICN

3
Competition policy objectives
  • Economic objectives
  • Freedom to engage in commerce
  • Protection of competitive processes (not
    necessarily of competitors!)
  • Efficiency
  • Static
  • Dynamic
  • Non-economic objectives
  • Fairness
  • Social justice, eg. South Africa

4
Competition policy instruments
  • Regulations on domestic entry
  • Regulation of ongoing business
  • Regulation of exit
  • Barriers to trade and to FDI
  • Competition advocacy
  • Competition law

5
Importance of barriers to entry, imports, and FDI
  • Well established in the literature
  • New analyses of size of barriers to entry in
    developing countries large in some developing
    and industrial economies
  • Barriers to imports and FDI recall Hoekman
    presentations yesterday
  • Key question is whether lowering these barriers
    completely eliminates domestic market power. If
    so, not much role for other instruments of
    competition policy, such as competition law.

6
Competition law instruments
  • Measures against cartels
  • Measures against abuse of a dominant position
  • Measures against collusion or collective
    dominance
  • Measures against predatory pricing
  • Measures regulating nature of inter-firm
    cooperation on research, development, and
    marketing of products

7
Spread of competition law in the 1990s
  • Number of jurisdictions adopting some form of
    competition law in the 1990s
  • EU member states 8
  • Non-EU high income OECD nations 3
  • Developing countries 27
  • Least developed countries 0
  • Total 38
  • Even so many developing countries and least
    developed countries still dont have competition
    laws

8
Why has the spread occurred?
  • World Bank-IMF conditionality
  • Fear of MNCs and FDI
  • To complement trade and investment reforms
  • As part of a regional trade agreement
  • FTAA negotiations
  • As part of accession negotiations to the EU
  • Eastern European nations
  • Growing profile given to competition law in
    international fora

9
Effects of competition law on economic development
  • Direct effects on market outcomes
  • Indirect effects competition law affects the
    degree of inter-firm rivalry, which in turn can
    affect
  • Innovation
  • Productivity growth and economic growth
  • Prices paid by customers, including the
  • Poor
  • Government
  • Indirect effects often work through deterrents to
    firms to engage in anti-competitive practices

10
Competition law and dynamic economic performance
is there a conflict?
  • Yes
  • Cartels prevent price competition and finance
    investments needed for growth
  • Mergers are needed to promote national champions
  • Unconstrained rivalry in banking sector and
    network industries is inefficient
  • No
  • Are cartels the best way to finance investment?
    What about investment credits, subsidies?
  • Do larger firms have higher productivity levels
    and growth? No.
  • Argument for a sectoral exemption from
    competition policy, not a general exception

11
Even if there is a conflict, here are five ways
to manage the conflict in a national law
  • Exempt state actions from competition policy
  • Allow competition policy to have multiple
    objectives
  • like in South Africa
  • Give dynamic as well as static efficiency a role
    in competition enforcement
  • like in the US, Canada, and EU
  • Create sectoral exemptions
  • Allow national cabinets to over-rule the
    competition authority
  • e.g. recent merger of Eon-Ruhrgas in Germany

12
Evidence on link between competition law and
dynamic economic performance
  • Cross-country studies
  • Strengths and weaknesses
  • Effects on economic growth
  • Dutz and Hayri (1999)
  • Effects on productivity growth
  • Dutz and Vagliasindi (2000), Eastern Europe
  • Effects on price-cost margins
  • Hoekman and Lee (2003)

13
Direct effects of competition law national
enforcement actions against cartels
  • What are cartels?
  • Enforcement actions
  • Arguments against enforcing cartel laws in
    developing countries
  • Cost-benefit analysis of cartel enforcement

14
What are cartels? Who gets hurt by them?
  • Types of cartel
  • Bid rigging
  • Price fixing
  • Allocating market shares and quotas
  • Restrict output levels
  • Victimscustomers
  • Governments
  • Private consumers (including the poor)
  • Firms

15
More than 20 developing countries have taken
action against cartels in recent years
  • These countries are found in every continent and
    at every stage of development
  • See tables in section III of my WTO report
  • Lots of bid rigging cases (about a quarter of the
    case load), see table III.T2
  • Cases involve the poor and access to medicines
  • Peruvian case against poultry
  • Romanian pharmacists
  • Socartel enforcement is not the preserve of rich
    countries

16
Two common arguments against cartel enforcement
and their flaws
  • Critics of national cartel enforcement make often
    make the following two arguments that do not
    stand up to scrutiny
  • Open and contestable markets destroy cartels
  • We cant afford cartel enforcement
  • Let us examine argument each in turn

17
Open and contestable markets do not destroy all
cartelsfor good reasons
  • For this theory to work it requires
  • No or low barriers to entry by new firms no or
    low barriers to FDI no or low import barriers
  • Is this the case in your economy?
  • High prices to act as a signal to new firms
  • But list prices rarely indicate true transaction
    prices, so where does the signal come from?
  • Or high profits act as a signal to new firms
  • But private firms dont report profits and
    publicly traded firms dont report profits by
    product line. So where does the signal come from?

18
Cant afford cartel enforcement?
  • Suppose 1 less state contracts are subject to
    bid rigging and prices on those contracts fall 5

19
Summary of effects of competition law in
developing economy
  • Effects of dynamic economic performance
  • Productivity growth
  • Economic growth
  • Effects of exercise of market power
  • Effects on prices including those paid by poor
    and the government
  • I will discuss the challenges faced by
    implementing competition law in developing
    countries in the case study session

20
Developments at the international level
  • Surge in international cartel enforcement after
    1993
  • Implications for developing economies
  • Is there a case for international action on
    cartels?
  • Initiatives in
  • UNCTAD
  • OECD
  • WTO
  • ICN

21
Cartels detected in the 1990s
  • Prevalence 39 cartels
  • Diverse membership 31 economies (including 8
    developing economies).
  • Duration 24 cartels lasted at least 4 years.
  • Overcharges on imports are not just the only
    adverse effect on developing economies.
  • Exports are reduced too.
  • Technology transfer slowed down also.

22
(No Transcript)
23
The international vitamins cartel
  • Worldwide cartel, 1989-1999
  • US Federal authorities took action in 1999
  • US fines exceeded 900 million EU fines of a
    similar magnitude
  • What effects on developing countries?

24
Vitamins cartel targeted nations without active
cartel enforcement
25
Overcharges on vitamins imports 1990-1999
  • Singapore 245.22m
  • Hong Kong 178.48m
  • Thailand 78.45m
  • China 77.61m
  • Indonesia 45.32m
  • Philippines 29.94m
  • India 25.71m
  • Malaysia 22.41m

26
Attacking cartels Lessons from the 1990s
  • Cartels are conspiracies prosecution requires
    evidence of inter-firm agreements.
  • Tough sanctions are important, and so are
    leniency or amnesty programmes.
  • But what is the case for an international
    agreement?
  • Cartel members meet and hide evidence abroad
    often in jurisdictions with no enforcement.
  • Non-enforcement creates harms trading partners
  • Enforcement actions against cartels reveals
    information that is of value to other trading
    partners.

27
Initiatives at the international level UNCTAD
and OECD
  • UNCTAD
  • UNCTAD Set
  • IGE
  • Regional workshops
  • OECD
  • Recommendation on Hard Core Cartels (1998)
  • Best practices and peer review
  • Three Global Fora on Competition Policy
  • Regional workshops
  • UNCTAD Set and HCC Recommendation are non-binding
    agreements

28
Initiatives at the international levelWTO
  • Singapore issue competition
  • Doha Development Declaration
  • Discussions in the Working Group
  • Cancun WTO Ministerial in September
  • Proposals for a multilateral framework on
    competition policy, including
  • Provisions on core principles
  • Provisions on hard core cartels
  • Provisions on voluntary cooperation
  • Capacity building

29
Initiatives at the international levelWTO
(continued)
  • Important to appreciate what the proponents are
    arguing for and not arguing for
  • Proposals are for a set of minimum standards for
    a small set of competition law-related matters
  • They are not arguing that
  • All WTO members must enact all types of
    competition law
  • All WTO members must create a separate
    competition agency
  • Only efficiency or a narrow set of objectives are
    allowed for competition law
  • Industrial policies must end
  • Exemptions, exclusions etc are to be banned

30
Initiatives at the international levelWTO
(continued)
  • Analysis of proposals for a multilateral
    framework on competition policy
  • Provisions for hard core cartels well founded
  • Provisions for core principles little case for
    discrimination in enforcement of competition law
    (national champions)
  • Provisions on voluntary cooperation resource
    costs are likely to be very small for economies
    with new competition enforcement regimes
  • Capacity building
  • Resource cost-based arguments see section II of
    my WTO report
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com