The Final Argument - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

The Final Argument

Description:

Some forms are inseparable from the things that have it they ... Both liberal arts and physical training train the soul. Strict censorship of literary works. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:12
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: gordon87
Category:
Tags: argument | final

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Final Argument


1
The Final Argument
  • Socrates replies to Cebes by presenting a final
    argument for the immortality of the soul
  • Some forms are inseparable from the things that
    have itthey are essential forms. Cold is
    essential to snow, heat is essential to fire,
    oddness is essential to the number 3

2
  • The soul is that which brings life to the body.
    There can be no soul without life, therefore, the
    life is essential to the soul
  • But if life is essential to the soul, then the
    soul cannot die.
  • Therefore the soul is immortal

3
Criticisms
  • Argument assumes that to be alive a body must
    possess a separate thing a soul
  • The proper conclusion is not that the soul lives
    forever, but that if there is a soul, there must
    be life
  • Just as fire is hot implies that if there is
    fire, there is also heat.

4
The main questions of the Republic
  • Is it better to be just or unjust?
  • What is it for a person to be just?
  • What is an ideal city? What makes the ideal city
    a just city.
  • Plato connects these moral questions with
    fundamental issues in metaphysics and
    epistemology what is knowledge? What is the true
    nature of reality?

5
Book II of the Republic
  • Glaucon and Socrates distinguish three different
    kinds of Good?
  • Which kind is justice?

6
The three kinds of good
  • Good in itself (intrinsically good
  • Good in itself and for its consequences
  • Good only for its consequences (or only good as a
    means)

7
  • Glaucon argues for the view that justice is a
    good, but only for its consequences, and is in
    fact bad in and of itself
  • Socrates holds justice is good in itself and for
    its consequences

8
The Ring of Gyges
  • Suppose you had a ring that would make you
    invisible (allowing you commit injustice without
    being discovered).
  • If such a ring were available how would a just
    persons actions differ from an unjust person?
  • (1) If there would be no difference, that shows
    we only think of justice as good as a means.
  • (2) If the just person remains just even though
    he can get away with being unjust, then that
    shows that people consider justice to be good.

9
  • Glaucon Justice is good as a means of avoiding
    suffering injustice. We agree to abide by the
    rules of morality so that other people dont harm
    us, not because its bad to do harm (injustice)
    to other people

10
  • If the Ring of Gyges example is persuasive, it
    tells us that we think of morality in terms of
    external rewards.
  • It does not tell us however that justice really
    is only good for its rewards.
  • People could be simply mistaken they might think
    justice is only good for its consequences, while
    really its good for its consequences and for its
    own sake.

11
We need to first discover what justice is
  • Socrates Justice is easier to discover in a
    city, then in an individual, so lets discover
    what justice is in a city first, then we can
    better see how justice applies to individuals.
  • So they begin to discuss what an ideal city would
    be like

12
How should the work be divided in the city?
  • People should perform only one task.
  • Why?

13
  • People have different natural talents. A well run
    city will have each person do what they are by
    nature best suited for.
  • If you work at one task regularly you will get
    better at that task

14
  • 372a-372c Socrates describes an ideal city.
  • But Glaucon objects.

15
  • The first ideal city lacks luxuries, it is a
    simple city.
  • Socrates says while the simple city still strikes
    him as ideal, it might be useful to look into a
    wealthy, feverish, city.

16
What new thing do we get with a wealthy, feverish
city?
  • WAR!
  • We need warriors.
  • Following the principle of specialization, these
    warriors need to be those who are best suited for
    the task, a professional army.
  • They also need to be trained appropriately.

17
Warriors need to be trained
  • Music and gymnastic
  • Both liberal arts and physical training train the
    soul
  • Strict censorship of literary works. Only those
    works that contribute to the virtues of the
    guardians (later called auxilliaries)will be
    allowed.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com