Title: Policy Analysis Tools:
1Policy Analysis Tools
2Cost-Benefit Analysis
- A technique for systematically estimating the
efficiency impacts of policies - Valuable in identifying and categorizing costs
and benefits for rational decision making in the
public arena - Used with variable success in a broad range of
public policy areas - Success of use depends on the degree to which
cost and benefits can be monetized
3Cost-Benefit Analysis
- It can answer logical, rational questions such
as - Should government produce a good/service?
- e.g., public housing, parking garage
- Should government intervene in the market?
- Regulating airline safety, automobile safety
- How much of the good/service should be produced?
- Superfund cleanups, public transportation
4Getting a handle on the costs and benefits of
proposed policies
5Cost-Benefit Analysis
- It is a technique that can be used to evaluate
government projects and programs. It encompasses
an appraisal of a policy based on the costs and
benefits of the project, measured in comparable
units within and across time.
6Limitations to Cost-Benefit Analysis
7Limitations to Cost-Benefit Analysis
Most policies involve budget allocation costs.
However, many policy benefits and costs are
neither tangible nor economically visible.
8Limitations to C-B Analysis in the Social Policy
Arena
- Measurement of benefits
- Some excellent sources of data
- flood control, bridges, cancer screening
- Some immeasurable benefits
- Impact of education, welfare programs
- Benefits of greater safety, wildlife preservation
9Limitations to C-B Analysis in the Social Policy
Arena
- Measurement of costs
- Direct outlays are easy to determined
- Private cost
- Burden on taxpayers, inequities
- Social costs
- Concentrated highly visible costs (housing,
welfare) - Widespread invisible (tax burden)
- Opportunity costs (rarely considered)
10Limitations to C-B Analysis in the Social Policy
Arena
- Criterion of efficiency
- Bottom line for decision making?
- Issues of equity
- Who pays, who gains?
- Externalities
- Unintended side effect ( and -)
- Offsetting behavior
11Advantages of Cost-Benefit Analysis
12Advantages of CBA
- Provides a decision making tool that is based on
objective standards - Allows for a quantitative comparison between
multiple solutions for policy problems - Can be used to monitor the efficiency of existing
programs
13Some central C-B concepts before we start
14Central C-B Concepts
- Time Value of Money
- Cost of life
15Cost-Benefit Concepts
- Time Value of Money
- inflation
- discount rate
16Inflation
- A dollar today is always more valuable than a
dollar next year - Consumer Price Index
- An index of prices used to measure the change in
the cost of basic goods and services in
comparison with a fixed base period - Measures inflation
- Considerable variation across time
17(No Transcript)
18Inflation
- In a cost-benefit analysis decisions must be made
in constant dollars - You cant add apples and oranges
19How do we deal with inflation and the value of
money over time?
- How do we add
- apples and oranges
20Discounting
- Discounting takes care of two factors that make
it difficult to add up monies over time - The influence of inflation
- The earning power of money
- Using a discount rate you extract out the
inflationinterest effect from future costs and
benefits - Future dollars are worth less today
21Discounting
- In addition, using a discount rate you are
assuming that money invested today can grow at
a compound rate, producing more money in the
future - You need less money now to produce a specified
amount of money in the future
22Cost-Benefit Concepts
Dn Present Value Dollars in the future r
Discount rate (InflationInterest) n Number of
Years
23Discount Rate
- Choice of a discount rate is speculative and
subject to much debate - What will future inflation rate be?
- What will investment yields be in the future?
- Discount rate
- Estimate (inflation rate bond yield rate)
- E.g., 2 68 discount rate
24An example
25Present Value
- Assume that you will be given exactly 1,000 from
Grandma on your birthday for the next 3 years.
How much is this 3 year b-day present worth to
you TODAY? Assume an annual interest/discount
rate of 6.
26Present Value
- Assume that you will be given exactly 1,000 from
Grandma on your birthday for the next 3 years.
How much is this 3 year b-day present worth to
you TODAY? Assume an annual interest/discount
rate of 6.
Today
1
2
3
1,000
1,000
1,000
?
Dn
27Present Value (Formula) Dn / (1r)n
- (1,000)/(1.06) 1 (1,000)/(1.06) 2
(1,000)/(1.06) 3
0
1
2
3
28Cost-Benefit Analysis Overview
How is a cost-benefits analysis done?
29Step 1 Identifying Relevant Impacts
30Identifying Relevant Impacts
- Identify all relevant impacts
- Classify them as costs or benefits for various
groups - Choosing geographic boundaries
- e.g., flood control, public libraries, etc.
- Choosing relevant groups with preference standing
- Whose costs and benefits will be measured in a
decision to improve security in a local prison?
31Step 2 Monetizing Relevant Impacts
32Monetizing Relevant Impacts
- Valuing inputs
- Measurable costs (objective)
- Opportunity costs (subjective)
33Monetizing Relevant Impacts
- Valuing outcomes
- Benefits of policy/program (objective)
- Willingness to pay (subjective)
34Step 3 Discounting for Time and Risk
35Discounting for Time and Risk
- Discounted future benefits/costs
- Taking account of risk
- Capital depreciation
36Step 4 Choosing Among Alternative Policies
37Choosing Among Alternative Policies
- Cost benefit ratio
- Benefits/Costs gt 1 implement policy
38Numerical Example
39Cost-Benefit AnalysisAn Example
40Taxing alcohol to save lives
- Highway fatalities caused by alcohol impaired
drivers - Problem of younger drivers
- Innocent lives lost
- Injury and property damage
- Cost of morbidity health care, accidents at
work, loss of productivity, etc.
41Identifying the Costs and Benefits Over a
Specified Period of Time
- Time Period 1 year
- Benefits (1) Tax revenue
- 30 increase in tax
- Consumer drink less (-16.6 in demand)
- ESTIMATE Increase of 16,739 billion
42Identifying the Costs and Benefits Over a
Specified Period of Time
- Benefit (2) Reduction in fatalities
- 1,650 fewer young driver fatalities
- 1,270 non-driver fatalities from young drivers
- 861 driver and non-driver fatalities from gt21
year old drivers - Assume each life is worth 1million
- Benefit (3) Reduction in property damage
- 0.65 billion/year
43Identifying the Costs and Benefits Over a
Specified Period of Time
- Benefit (4) Health and productivity gains
- Absenteeism and workplace accidents
- 4.29billion in annual health savings
- 6.61billion in productivity savings
44- How to count lives saved
- Three estimates
- Upper bound consumers of alcohol are totally
uninformed about increased risks of alcohol
consumption all drivers and victims fatalities
regarded as benefits - Lower bound consumers of alcohol are totally
informed about increased risks of alcohol
consumption only victim fatalities regarded as
benefits - Best guess between the two
45(No Transcript)
46(No Transcript)
47Another example
48School Bus SafetyEnhancement Program
- Installation of seat belts on school busses to
ensure child safety when traveling on the bus
49Identifying the Costs and Benefits Over a
Specified Period of Time
50Identifying the Costs and Benefits Over a
Specified Period of Time
- Time period
- Assume a 20 year decision period
- Benefits
- Assume the only benefits are childrens lives
saved - No injuries are taken into account in this
example - Assume each childs life is worth 1,000,000
today - Assume that 350 childrens lives are lost on
school buses each year in the state directly as a
result of no seat belts
51Identifying the Costs and Benefits Over a
Specified Period of Time
- Costs
- Assume it costs it cost 4,000mill to install the
seatbelts on all school buses in the state - Assume that it costs 10mill to maintain these
seatbelts in useable order in the first year - Assume that after 10 years many of the seatbelts
have to be replaced at a cost of 200mill in 2017
(Capital depreciation)
52Identifying the Costs and Benefits Over a
Specified Period of Time
- Time Value of Money
- Assume that the cost of a childs life increases
at 3 per year (inflation) - Assume that the cost of maintaining seatbelts on
school buses increases by 3 per year (inflation) - Assume that money invested today in a fund can
earn 3.7 interest per year above inflation and
that inflation is running at an average of 3 per
year (6.7 discount rate)
53(No Transcript)
54Lets recap what we know so far
55Cost-benefit analysis
- Provides a rational framework for decision making
in the public arena - Allows us to compare multiple solutions to
problems simultaneously - Provides an objective criterion to base the
decision on (efficiency, or at least benefits gt
cost)
56But..the approach has limitations
- Measurement of costs and benefits
- Efficiency criterion not always applicable
- Cannot take into account equity issues in cost
distribution - Often cannot predict externalities that can
significantly impact the analysis
57Despite limitations still a useful tool
- Time value of money
- Concept of inflation
- Value of the Consumer Price Index
- Capital depreciation
- Andof course the discount rate
Lets consider the discount rate one more time
before moving on
58A discount rate is a single combined number that
estimates two components
- What the inflation rate will be in future years
- What percentage interest rate above inflation
money will earn so that it grows in future years.
For example if you accept a rate of return on
your bank investment that is under the average
inflation rate (lt 2.4 apr in 2008) you will be
losing money in every subsequent year. If the
rate is at inflation, youll be simply protecting
your money, not making your money work for you.
59So..
- If inflation is running at 3.5 and youve
managed to get a rate of return on your invested
money from the bank of 6.3 you are beating
inflation by 3 and your money is working for
you. - The concept of a discount rate assumes that the
rate of return on invested money that is greater
than inflation on average. - How much greater depends on the value of the
discount rate you choose to use in your
cost-benefit analysis.
60Now..onto the next question
61Question
- Can lives saved or lost be reasonably monetized?
62Well, even if you dont.
- the Federal government values lives every day.
63Federal Aviation Administration(Flight TWA 800)
64- TWA Flight 800 was a TWA passenger flight that
disintegrated while flying from John F. Kennedy
International Airport (New York) to Charles de
Gaulle International Airport (Paris) in 1996,
killing all 230 aboard. The incident has been one
of the most investigated crashes in aviation
history.
65- The aircraft was flying more than eight miles off
the coast of East Moriches, New York (on Long
Island) when the plane's center wing fuel tank
exploded. The aircraft developed cracks around
the nose as a consequence of the explosion, and
the front part of the aircraft broke off
(including the cockpit and first class section).
The left wing ruptured, and the leaking fuel from
the left wing tank ignited in the air, triggering
a second explosion.
66- A four-year investigation by the U.S. National
Transportation Safety Board, the only official
investigation to date, concluded that fumes
inside the center wing tank ignited, causing the
explosion. The NTSB concluded that the spark was
created by faulty wire insulation and an
electrical arc.
67- The NTSB contends that the explosion could have
been prevented by use of a system to smother
flammable vapors inside fuel tanks, rather than
the industry standards of the time that focused
on eliminating ignition sources that could enter
them from the outside.
68The Cost of Saving a Life
69Can we reasonably value a life?
- And, are all lives lost of equal value?
70An alternative method
71LIFE YEARS SAVED
- Avoiding a particular risk of death today means
that you are more likely to live the
statistically average life span. - The difference between this average life span and
a premature death is the number of life years
saved.
72Consider the case of mammograms.
- If we gave every woman in the U.S. an annual
mammogram we would detect some breast cancers in
the early stages and prevent some women from
dying prematurely
73Mammogram screening
- But, since the number of women whose lives would
be saved is small, the cost per life saved would
be high since wed be screening lots of women who
never get breast cancer. - Besides, in the absence of a mammogram women
would most likely get an annual physical breast
exam, which might detect the cancer anyway. - So, we need to focus on the additional cost of
the mammogram policy and compare it to the net
additional benefit (additional life years saved)
of adding the mammogram policy. - Remembering that policy benefits will differ for
women of different ages.
74Hillary Rodham Clinton did just that in 1993/94
in an attempt to reform the U.S. health care
system
- She devised the Clinton health care plan in which
it was decided not to cover a cost for a life
year saved that exceeded 100,000.
Thats why the plan provided regular mammograms
for women in their 50s (108,401) but not for
women in their 40s (186,635).
75But, even additional years of life are not of
equal value
Concept of morbidity
- Need a measure that captures quality of
remaining life years
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY)
76Lets consider an example
77Quality-adjusted Life Year (QALY)
- Patient Option 1 No Surgery
- 10 remaining years of life
- Quality .6
- QALY 6 years
78Quality-adjusted Life Year (QALY)
- Patient Option 2 Surgery
- 15 remaining years of life
- Quality .8
- QALY 12 years
Where do those extra 6 years of life come from?
79Quality-adjusted Life Year (QALY)
- Patient Option 2 Surgery
- 15 remaining years of life
- Quality .8
- QALY 12 years
- longevity effect (5 X .8) 4yrs
- QOL effect (10 X (.8 - .6)) 2 years
80Alternatives to Cost-Benefit Analysis
..that assist policy makers in their decision
making
81Alternatives to Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Risk-Risk analysis
- Health-Health analysis
82Cost-effectiveness analysis
- Makes programs with identical types of outcomes
comparable - Shows which program yields the greatest outcome
per dollar spent - DOES NOT indicate whether a particular policy has
positive net benefits overall - Example Effectiveness of medication versus diet
in preventing heart attacks compared to the costs
of the two programs
83Other examples of how cost-effectiveness analysis
is used
- Feb 2000 JAMA Study concluded that annual
retinal screening for individuals with Type 2
diabetes may not be warranted on
cost-effectiveness grounds (QALY150,000). - Vijan et al. 2000 JAMA Compared with biannual
screening, annual retinotherapy screening for
low-risk patients with diabetes cost more than
100,000 for each QALY - NEJM 2000 Extending hospital stays beyond 4 days
for patients with uncomplicated myocardial
infractions was economically unattractive since
it cost more than 105,000 per QALY - Annals of Internal Medicine 2000 Viagra is a
cost effective treatment for erectile
dysfunction, producing an incremental QALY for
the relatively low cost of 11,000
84Risk-Risk Analysis
- Policy analysts have long realized that reducing
one risk may unintentionally raise another risk - Risk-Risk analysis can be used to yield a count
of desired/undesired outcomes in different units - Does not take account of the costs and benefits
of a policy - Example treating drinking water with chlorine
reduces the incidence of infectious diseases, but
exposure to chlorine raises the risk of cancer
85Health-Health Analysis
- An analyst who knows how the costs of a program
are distributed forecasts the number of adverse
health outcomes induced by the program - The analyst then compares a count of the
fatalities averted by a program versus a count of
fatalities induced by an alternative program
86Health-Health Analysis
- E.g., Passenger-side airbags For every five
lives saved by passenger-side airbags, a life
(usually a child) is lost. Thats a 51
health-health ratio. - Program beneficiaries (adults) are different from
those who bear the cost (children), yielding
DISTRIBUTIONAL differences. - Disadvantage?
- It confines the analysis to a tally of mortality
costs.
87In summary
88Methods comparing cost and benefits
- Cost-benefit analysis
- benefits - costs (same units)
- Cost-effectiveness analysis
- costs compared to desirable (adverse) outcomes
89Methods comparing cost and benefits
- Risk-Risk analysis
- Measures only probabilities of outcomes
- Health-Health analysis
- Lives saved-lives lost
- Measures only mortality risks
90Methods of Comparing Costs and Benefits
COSTS
Benefits