Title: Breast cancer screening and prevention in the highrisk patient
1Breast cancer screening and prevention in the
high-risk patient
- Kirsten Stoesser, MD
- August 2008
2Objectives
- Based on history
- Categorize a patient as average risk or high-risk
for breast cancer - Based on risk level
- Know appropriate breast cancer screening
recommendations - Know when to offer genetic counseling and testing
- Know when to offer chemoprophylaxis for primary
prevention - Know when to offer surgical consult for
prophylactic mastectomy or oophorectomy
3Case 1
- A 38 yo female patient presents for her annual
physical exam. On her history, she has a
maternal grandmother, and two paternal aunts who
had breast cancer, all after age 50. - Does she have a high-risk family history?
- Does she need referral to a genetic counselor?
- Does she need BRCA gene mutation testing?
- How often does she need mammograms?
- Does she need yearly breast MRI?
4Case 2
- A 25 yo patient presents the same day for her
annual physical. On family history, her mother
died at age 35 from breast cancer. BRCA status
of her mother is unknown. The patient has
already seen a genetic counselor, has tested
negative for BRCA gene mutations, and informs you
that she needs yearly breast mammograms and MRIs. - Does she really need yearly MRIs?
- Should she be offered chemoprophylaxis?
- Should she be offered surgical prophylaxis?
5Breast cancer-- estimated new invasive cancer
cases and deaths in the US for 2007
- Estimated new cases
- Women 178,480
- Men 2,030 (1 of all breast cancers)
- Total 180,510
- Estimated deaths
- Women 40,460
- Men 450
- Total 40,910
6Female breast cancer incidence and mortality
rate, Utah, 2000-2004
- Breast cancer incidence
- 117.5/100,000
- Mortality
- 23.2/100,000
7Breast cancer-- death rates
- Only lung cancer causes more cancer deaths in
women - From 1990-2004 national breast cancer death rates
have decreased 2-3 annually - The decline in mortality since 1990 is attributed
to improvements in early detection and treatment
8Breast cancer-- precursor lesions
- Majority of breast cancers start in ductal cells
or lobules - Atypical ductal hyperplasia --gt ductal carcinoma
in situ (DCIS) --gt invasive cancer - Atypical lobular hyperplasia --gt lobular
carcinoma in situ (LCIS) --gt invasive cancer - Both atypical ductal hyperplasia and LCIS have a
similar risk for progressing to breast cancer
9Probability of developing invasive breast cancer
during selected age intervals
10Risk factors for breast cancer
- Genetics
- Family history of breast cancer
- BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation carriers
- Increased lifetime estrogen exposure
- Early menarche, late menopause
- Nulliparity or older age at first birth
- Absence of breastfeeding
- Increasing age
- HRT
- Personal breast history
- Mammographically dense breasts
- Prior breast biopsies
- Prior atypical ductal hyperplasia or LCIS on
biopsy - Prior breast cancer
- Miscellaneous
- Radiation exposure
- Alcohol
- Obesity
- Sedentary lifestyle
11Risk stratification
- Patients can be stratified into the following
categories based on their risk factors - Average risk
- High-risk
- Recommendations differ dependent on risk for
- Screening
- Risk-reduction strategies
12Approach to stratify risk of breast cancer
- Get a thorough history!
- Family history
- Clinical history
- Genetic testing
- If indicated by family history
13Approach to the high-risk patient
- Increased surveillance
- Recommended for all patients
- Referral to genetic counseling if high-risk due
to family history - BRCA testing
- Prevention
- Prophylactic medication (chemoprevention)
- Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs)
- Tamoxifen
- Raloxifene
- Aromatase inhibitors
- Prophylactic surgery
- Bilateral mastectomy
- Bilateral oophorectomy
14Highest risk factor for breast cancer-- BRCA
mutation
- The highest risk factor for breast cancer is
having a gene mutation in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 - Both are autosomal dominant, high-penetrance
genes - Normally function as a tumor suppressor
- Over 30 known mutations
- 35 to 85 lifetime risk of breast cancer
- 10 to 50 lifetime risk of ovarian cancer
15Family history suggestive of a BRCA1 or BRCA2
mutation
- Two first degree relatives with breast cancer,
one of whom received the diagnosis ltage 50 - Three or more first or second degree relatives
with breast cancer at any age - Both breast and ovarian cancer among first and
second degree relatives - First degree relative with bilateral breast
cancer - 2 or more first or second degree relatives with
ovarian cancer regardless of age - First or second degree relative with both breast
and ovarian cancer - A male relative with breast cancer
16Family history suggestive of a BRCA1 or BRCA2
mutation
- Women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent
- Any first degree relative with breast or ovarian
cancer - Two second degree relatives with breast or
ovarian cancer
17- What percentage of patients have a family history
that is suggestive of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation? - 0.01
- 0.1
- 1
- 10
18- What percentage of patients have a family
history that is suggestive of a BRCA1 or BRCA2
mutation? - 0.01
- 0.1
- 1 (to 2 )
- 10
ACS 2007
19- In those patients who have a family history
suggestive of an inherited mutation, what percent
of families will actually carry this mutation? - 5
- 10
- 25
- 50
20- In those patients who have a family history
suggestive of an inherited mutation, what percent
of families will actually carry this mutation? - 5
- 10
- 25
- 50
ACS 2007
21Genetic counseling and BRCA testing
- Women with a FH at increased risk for BRCA1 or
BRCA2 mutations should be referred for genetic
counseling and evaluation for BRCA testing (level
B recommendation)
USPSTF 2007
22Genetic testing results
- If a woman from a family with a known BRCA
mutation tests negative, then her family history
does not factor in to her breast cancer risk - In women from high-risk families by history,
failure to find a mutation in an affected
individual does not decrease risk
23- Of those women who develop breast cancer
- 85 have no prior family history
24High-risk factors for breast cancerrelative risk
Willey et al. Screening and follow-up of the
patient at high risk for breast cancer. Obstet
Gynecol 20071101404-16.
25Risk assessment tools
- Gail model
- Uses predominantly clinical history
- Estimates 5-yr and lifetime breast cancer risk
- www.breastcancerprevention.org
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel
Project - www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool
- National Cancer Institute
- Claus model
- Uses family history only
- Tyrer-Cuzick model
- BRCAPRO
26Risk assessment tools-- Gail model
- Most commonly used by clinicians
- Least accurate
- Based on
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel
Project - Breast Cancer Detection and Demonstration Project
- Looks at
- Current age, age at menarche, age at first live
birth, number of prior breast biopsies, biopsy
results, of first degree relatives with breast
cancer, and race - Limitations
- Does not account for extended family history,
history of chest radiation, breast density - A calculated 5-year risk of breast cancer of
1.67 is high-risk - Women age 35 or older with a 5-yr breast cancer
risk of 1.67 or more were included in the first
breast cancer chemoprevention trial
27Sample Gail model calculation
- Hx of breast cancer, DCIS, or LCIS No
- Womans age 36
- Age of menarche 12 to 13
- Age at first birth of child gt30
- First-degree relatives with breast cancer 0
- Hx of breast biopsy No
- Race White
- 5 year risk
- This patient 0.5
- Average patient 0.3
- Lifetime risk
- This patient 13.8
- Average patient 12.5
28Risk assessment tools-- Claus model
- Includes
- Number of maternal and paternal first and
second-degree relatives with breast cancer - Their age at diagnosis
29Sample Claus model calculation
- Number of first degree relatives with breast
cancer 0 - Number of second degree relatives with breast
cancer 1 - Age at diagnosis 55
- Risk of breast cancer
- By age 39 --gt 0.2
- By age 49 --gt 1.3
- By age 59 --gt 3.4
- By age 69 --gt 6.3
- By age 79 --gt 9.0
30(No Transcript)
31Breast cancer screening
- Screening has significantly contributed to a
23.5 decline in breast cancer mortality from
1990 to 2000
National Cancer Institute 2007
32Breast cancer screening-- harms and benefits
- Potential benefits
- Earlier diagnosis
- Decreased mortality
- Potential harms
- False-positive results
- Unnecessary biopsies
- Increased anxiety
- Increased cost
- Inconvenience
- Overtreatment
- Overdiagnosis occurs mostly with DCIS
- Less than 50 of DCIS becomes invasive, but
everyone gets treated
33Breast cancer screening--methods
- Self breast exam (SBE)
- Clinical breast exam (CBE)
- Standard mammography
- MRI
34Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient--SBE
- Most women do not regularly perform
- If they do perform, most do it incorrectly
- The practice of regular breast self-exam by
trained women does not reduce breast cancer
mortality - Evidence from 2 large RCTs
- Randomized trial of breast self-examination in
Shanghai final results. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002. - Breast self-examination and death from breast
cancer a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2003.
35Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient--SBE
- Cochrane review 2003
- Conclusions
- SBE has no beneficial effect
- Increases the number of biopsies
- Evidence of harm
- Recommendation
- Women should NOT perform SBE
36Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient-- SBE
- USPSTF 2007
- Insufficient evidence to recommend for or against
breast self-examination - ACS 2007
- Monthly breast self-examination optional at any
age 20 or older
37Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient-- SBE
- If women choose to perform breast
self-examination after being informed of the lack
of benefit and potential harms, the physician
should train the patient in appropriate
technique, timing, and follow-up. - Knutson D, Steiner E. Screening for breast
cancer current recommendations and future
directions. Am Fam Phys 200751660-6.
38Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient--SBE
- Self breast-exam at any age
- Not supported by the evidence
- Physicians should discourage, or at least not
encourage - If patients want to perform, should be taught the
appropriate way to perform the exam
Harris, R. Screening for breast cancer what to
do with the evidence. Am Fam Phys 200751623-4.
39Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient-- CBE
- Sensitivity 50 at best
- 5 to 10 of breast cancers detected only by CBE
- (not detected by mammogram)
- USPSTF 2007
- Insufficient evidence to recommend for or against
CBE - ACS 2007
- CBE every 3 yrs ages 20 to 39
- CBE annually age 40 and older
40Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient--CBE
- Age 20 to 39
- Even necessary?
- Every 3 years?
- Age 40 to 49
- Benefits and harms approximately equal
- May discuss, but do not need to actively
encourage - Every 1 to 2 years, if at all
- Age 50 to 70
- Encourage every year
- Every 2 years acceptable
- After age 70
- Balance of benefits and harms uncertain, take
patients general health and life expectancy into
consideration
Harris, R. Screening for breast cancer what to
do with the evidence. Am Fam Phys 200751623-4.
41Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient-- standard mammography
- Sensitivity to detect breast cancer is between
60 to 90 - Less sensitive
- in younger women (ltage 40)
- in women with dense breasts
- in tumors associated with BRCA1 or 2
- Positive predictive value is higher in women who
are high-risk
42Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient-- standard mammography
- Women age 40 to 49
- reduces breast cancer mortality 15
- Number needed to screen to prevent one breast
cancer death after 14 years 1,792 - Women age 50 to 69
- reduces breast cancer mortality 22
- Number needed to screen to prevent one breast
cancer death after 14 years 838 - Humphrey et al. Breast cancer screening a
summary of the evidence from the USPSTF. Ann
Intern Med 2002137347-60.
43Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient-- standard mammography
- Cochrane review (2001)
- Meta-analysis concluded that screening for breast
cancer with mammography is unjustified - USPSTF (2007)
- Meta-analysis using many of the same trials
- For women of average risk, recommended screening
mammography (B recommendation) - Every one to two years for women ages 40 to 49
- Every year for women age 50 and older
- Little evidence to suggest this is better than
every 2 yrs - ACS (2007)
- Every year for women age 40 and older
44Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient-- mammogram
- Age 40 to 49
- Benefits and harms approximately equal
- May discuss, but do not need to actively
encourage - Every 1 to 2 years, if at all
- Age 50 to 70
- Encourage
- Every 2 years acceptable
- After age 70
- Balance of benefits and harms uncertain, take
patients general health and life expectancy into
consideration
Harris, R. Screening for breast cancer what to
do with the evidence. Am Fam Phys 200751623-4.
45Breast cancer screening-- MRI
- Not recommended for average risk patients
- Too expensive for screening all patients
- Availability issues
- More sensitive (but less specific) than
mammography in high-risk women - Sensitivity of 71 to 100 vs 16 to 40 for
mammogram in high-risk women - Particularly more sensitive with dense breasts
- Tumors found are smaller and earlier
- Combination of mammography and MRI is better than
either alone for detection - No data yet on mortality reduction
46ACS indications for annual breast cancer
screening with MRI
- Women age 30 or older with any of the following
should be screened yearly - Patient with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation
- First degree relative with BRCA1 or BRCA2
mutation - If the patient has not yet been tested
- History of therapeutic chest radiation between
the ages of 10 to 30 years - Lifetime risk of breast cancer of 20 or greater,
based on a risk assessment calculation tool that
depends largely on family history
47ACS indications for annual breast cancer
screening with MRI
- Of note what is NOT included
- Insufficient evidence to recommend for or against
MRI screening with other risk factors - Lifetime risk of breast cancer 15-20
- Hx of atypia/CIS/breast cancer
- Dense breasts
- These above items should be discussed
individually - MRI screening may be recommended by expert
opinion, but not endorsed by ACS
48Breast cancer screening in the high-risk patient
- SBE?
- CBE
- Annually or every 6 months?
- Mammogram
- Yearly
- ? Age to start
- ?Once determined they are high-risk
- If high-risk due to family history, start 10
years earlier than youngest affected first-degree
relative - If BRCA 1 or 2 mutation in patient (or in family
and patient not tested), start age 25 - MRI
- Yearly, starting at age 30, if meet ACS criteria
- (And consider screening if other high-risk
factors present that dont yet meet criteria,
such as dense breasts)
49Chemoprophylaxis of breast cancer
- Clinicians should discuss chemoprevention with
women at high risk for breast cancer and at low
risk for adverse effects of chemoprevention. (B
recommendation) - Clinicians should inform patients of the
potential benefits and harms of chemoprevention
(B recommendation)
USPSTF 2007
50- It isnow considered standard of care to
evaluate breast cancer risk factor information in
women and to counsel high-risk women about the
options of chemoprevention - Newman et al. Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and
Risk Reduction. Surg Clin N Am 87 (2007) 307-316.
51Tamoxifen
- Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator (SERM)
- Competes with estrogen for estrogen receptors on
breast cancer cells - Blocks estrogen uptake
- Prevents cell growth
- FDA-labeled for breast cancer prophylaxis in
high-risk patients - gt35 yo with a Gail model 5-yr risk of 1.67
- Dose 20 mg orally daily for 5 years
52Tamoxifen
- Only acts on estrogen receptor positive tumors
(ER) - BRCA2 gene mutation carriers can have estrogen
receptor positive or negative tumors - Tamoxifen is effective only in the subset of
patients who are ER - BRCA1 gene mutation carriers are usually estrogen
receptor negative - Tamoxifen is ineffective for most of these
patients
53Tamoxifen Prophylaxis
- Women using tamoxifen to treat established breast
cancer found to have a 47 lower risk of a second
primary breast cancer compared to patients not on
tamoxifen - Prompted the first large chemoprevention trial in
the US, the NSABP P-1 study in 1998 - Prospective, randomized
- Tamoxifen vs placebo for 5 yrs
- gt13,000 high-risk women enrolled
- Inclusion criteria
- Age 60 or greater,
- Or age 35-59 with a Gail model 5-yr risk of
breast cancer of 1.67 - Or personal history of LCIS
54Tamoxifen prophylaxis
- Tamoxifen lowered invasive breast cancer risk by
50 - For ER cancers
- No reduction in ER- cancers
- Statistically significant
- (95 CI 0.39-0.66)
- The trial was unblinded early
55Tamoxifen
- Increased risks of
- Uterine cancer
- Stroke
- Myocardial infarction
- Thromboemboli (DVT, PE)
- Cataracts
- Decreased risks of
- Osteoporosis
- Hyperlipidemia
- Side effects
- Hot flashes, night sweats, irregular menses
56Predicted benefits vs harms for 5 years of
tamoxifen per 1000 women
57Chemoprophylaxis of breast cancer
- Best for
- Women in their 40s who are at increased risk for
breast cancer and have no predisposition to
thromboembolism - Women in their 50s who are at increased risk for
breast cancer, have no predisposition to
thromboembolism, and do not have a uterus. - Less beneficial for
- Women in their 30s (less risk of breast cancer)
- Women gt age 60 (increased risk of thromboembolism)
58Raloxifene
- SERM
- FDA approved in Sept 2007 for breast cancer
prophylaxis in postmenopausal women at high risk - Dose 60 mg orally daily optimal duration unknown
- Risks similar to tamoxifen
- Less uterine cancer and cataract risk
59Tamoxifen vs Raloxifene
- Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR)
- 2006 JAMA
- 19,000 high-risk postmenopausal women
- Similar enrollment criteria as NSABP P-1
- Randomized to receive either tamoxifen or
raloxifene for 5 yrs - Comparable efficacy to prevent invasive breast
cancer - Raloxifene also reduced the risk of invasive
breast cancer by 50 - Raloxifene had fewer thromboembolic events,
cataracts, and trend for less uterine cancer - Similar risk of MI, stroke, and osteoporotic
fractures
60Aromatase inhibitors
- Block the peripheral conversion of
androstenedione to estrone and testosterone to
estradiol - Not yet approved for prophylaxis
- Anastrazole, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination
(ATAC) trial (Lancet 2002) - Multicenter, international, double-blind, RCT
- 9,366 postmenopausal women with early stage
breast cancer - After 33 months statistically significant gt50
reduction in contralateral primary invasive
breast cancers in the anastrazole alone group
61(No Transcript)
62Prophylactic oophorectomy
- In women who have a known BRCA mutation,
prophylactic oophorectomy can decrease breast
cancer incidence by 50 - Rebbeck et al. Breast cancer risk after
bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1
mutation carriers, J Natl cancer Inst
199991(17)1475-9. - Insufficient evidence regarding mortality benefit
- Adverse effects
- Premature menopause
- Increased risks of osteoporosis, cardiovascular
disease
63Prophylactic mastectomy
- Retrospective review of Mayo Clinic database
- 214 prophylactic mastectomy patients with
high-risk family history - Controls were 403 sisters of these patients
- Median f/u of 14 yrs
- 90 reduction in breast cancer incidence and
mortality - Hartman et al. Efficacy of bilateral
prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family
history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med
1999340(2)77-84. - Further analysis performed when BRCA testing
available - Similar risk reduction in subset of patients with
BRCA mutation - Hartman et al. Efficacy of bilateral
prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene
mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst
200193(21)1633-7. - Insufficient evidence regarding mortality benefit
64Case 1
- A 38 yo female patient presents for her annual
physical exam. On her history, she has a
maternal grandmother, and two paternal aunts who
had breast cancer, all after age 50. - Does she have a high-risk family history?
- Does she need referral to a genetic counselor?
- Does she need BRCA gene mutation testing?
- How often does she need mammograms?
- Does she need yearly breast MRI?
65Case 2
- A 25 yo patient presents the same day for her
annual physical. On family history, her mother
died at age 35 from breast cancer. BRCA status
of her mother is unknown. The patient has
already seen a genetic counselor, has tested
negative for BRCA gene mutations, and informs you
that she needs yearly breast mammograms and MRIs. - Does she really need yearly MRIs?
- Should she be offered chemoprophylaxis?
- Should she be offered surgical prophylaxis?
66Identifying high-risk patients in clinic
- Any FH of breast or ovarian cancer?
- Any 1º or 2º relative with both breast and
ovarian cancer? - Any male relatives with breast cancer?
- Any 1º relative with cancer in both breasts?
- Two or more 1º relatives?
- Three or more 1º or 2º relatives?
- Both breast and ovarian cancer in 1º or 2º
relatives? - Two or more 1º or 2º relatives with ovarian
cancer? - Has a relative tested positive for a BRCA gene
mutation? - Has the patient tested positive for a BRCA gene
mutation? - Gail model 5-yr risk 1.67?
- Lifetime risk 20
- Therapeutic chest radiation ages 10-30?
- HRT 10 yrs?
- Dense breast tissue?
- Atypical hyperplasia, LCIS, or prior breast
cancer?
67Summary--Management options for high-risk women
- Surveillance
- SBE?
- CBE yearly (? or q 6 mos)
- Annual mammogram (? age to start)
- Once determined high-risk
- 10 years younger than age of youngest affected
first degree relative - Age 25 if BRCA mutation carrier
- Annual MRI
- Starting at age 30 if they meet the ACS criteria
- Known BRCA mutation
- 1º relative with a BRCA mutation, and patient
untested - 20 or greater lifetime risk of breast cancer
- Chest radiation exposure between ages 10 and 30
yrs - And consider even if they dont meet ACS
criteria - Lifetme breast cancer risk 15-20
- Mammographically dense breasts
- Personal history of atypia, LCIS, breast cancer
68Summary--Management options for high-risk women
- Genetic testing
- If high-risk based on family history
- To help guide surveillance and prophylaxis
- Chemoprophylaxis
- If BRCA mutation carrier
- If Gail 5-yr risk 1.67
- Use of tamoxifen or raloxifene
- Surgical prophylaxis
- If BRCA mutation carrier
- Mastectomy and/or oophorectomy
69References
- ACS Recommendations on MRI and mammography for
breast cancer screening. Am Fam Phys
200751715-6. - Breast cancer facts and figures. ACS 2007-2008.
- Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. USPSTF
2007. - Harris, R. Screening for breast cancer what to
do with the evidence. Am Fam Phys 200751623-4. - Kutson D, Steiner E. Screening for breast
cancer Current Recommendations and Future
Directions. Am Fam Phys 200751660-6. - Newman LA, Vogel VG. Breast Cancer Risk
Assessment and Risk Reduction. Surg Clin N Am 87
(2007) 307-316. - Saslow D et al. American Cancer Society
Guideline for Breast Screening with MRI as an
adjunt to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007
5775-89. - Update on Breast Cancer Risk Reduction. Cedars
Sinai Medical Center. 2006. - Willey S, Costanza C. Screening and follow-up of
the patient at high-risk for breast cancer.
Obstet gynecol 20071101404-16.