Breast cancer screening and prevention in the highrisk patient - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 69
About This Presentation
Title:

Breast cancer screening and prevention in the highrisk patient

Description:

Breast cancer screening and prevention in the highrisk patient – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:150
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 70
Provided by: utah6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Breast cancer screening and prevention in the highrisk patient


1
Breast cancer screening and prevention in the
high-risk patient
  • Kirsten Stoesser, MD
  • August 2008

2
Objectives
  • Based on history
  • Categorize a patient as average risk or high-risk
    for breast cancer
  • Based on risk level
  • Know appropriate breast cancer screening
    recommendations
  • Know when to offer genetic counseling and testing
  • Know when to offer chemoprophylaxis for primary
    prevention
  • Know when to offer surgical consult for
    prophylactic mastectomy or oophorectomy

3
Case 1
  • A 38 yo female patient presents for her annual
    physical exam. On her history, she has a
    maternal grandmother, and two paternal aunts who
    had breast cancer, all after age 50.
  • Does she have a high-risk family history?
  • Does she need referral to a genetic counselor?
  • Does she need BRCA gene mutation testing?
  • How often does she need mammograms?
  • Does she need yearly breast MRI?

4
Case 2
  • A 25 yo patient presents the same day for her
    annual physical. On family history, her mother
    died at age 35 from breast cancer. BRCA status
    of her mother is unknown. The patient has
    already seen a genetic counselor, has tested
    negative for BRCA gene mutations, and informs you
    that she needs yearly breast mammograms and MRIs.
  • Does she really need yearly MRIs?
  • Should she be offered chemoprophylaxis?
  • Should she be offered surgical prophylaxis?

5
Breast cancer-- estimated new invasive cancer
cases and deaths in the US for 2007
  • Estimated new cases
  • Women 178,480
  • Men 2,030 (1 of all breast cancers)
  • Total 180,510
  • Estimated deaths
  • Women 40,460
  • Men 450
  • Total 40,910

6
Female breast cancer incidence and mortality
rate, Utah, 2000-2004
  • Breast cancer incidence
  • 117.5/100,000
  • Mortality
  • 23.2/100,000

7
Breast cancer-- death rates
  • Only lung cancer causes more cancer deaths in
    women
  • From 1990-2004 national breast cancer death rates
    have decreased 2-3 annually
  • The decline in mortality since 1990 is attributed
    to improvements in early detection and treatment

8
Breast cancer-- precursor lesions
  • Majority of breast cancers start in ductal cells
    or lobules
  • Atypical ductal hyperplasia --gt ductal carcinoma
    in situ (DCIS) --gt invasive cancer
  • Atypical lobular hyperplasia --gt lobular
    carcinoma in situ (LCIS) --gt invasive cancer
  • Both atypical ductal hyperplasia and LCIS have a
    similar risk for progressing to breast cancer

9
Probability of developing invasive breast cancer
during selected age intervals
10
Risk factors for breast cancer
  • Genetics
  • Family history of breast cancer
  • BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation carriers
  • Increased lifetime estrogen exposure
  • Early menarche, late menopause
  • Nulliparity or older age at first birth
  • Absence of breastfeeding
  • Increasing age
  • HRT
  • Personal breast history
  • Mammographically dense breasts
  • Prior breast biopsies
  • Prior atypical ductal hyperplasia or LCIS on
    biopsy
  • Prior breast cancer
  • Miscellaneous
  • Radiation exposure
  • Alcohol
  • Obesity
  • Sedentary lifestyle

11
Risk stratification
  • Patients can be stratified into the following
    categories based on their risk factors
  • Average risk
  • High-risk
  • Recommendations differ dependent on risk for
  • Screening
  • Risk-reduction strategies

12
Approach to stratify risk of breast cancer
  • Get a thorough history!
  • Family history
  • Clinical history
  • Genetic testing
  • If indicated by family history

13
Approach to the high-risk patient
  • Increased surveillance
  • Recommended for all patients
  • Referral to genetic counseling if high-risk due
    to family history
  • BRCA testing
  • Prevention
  • Prophylactic medication (chemoprevention)
  • Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs)
  • Tamoxifen
  • Raloxifene
  • Aromatase inhibitors
  • Prophylactic surgery
  • Bilateral mastectomy
  • Bilateral oophorectomy

14
Highest risk factor for breast cancer-- BRCA
mutation
  • The highest risk factor for breast cancer is
    having a gene mutation in either BRCA1 or BRCA2
  • Both are autosomal dominant, high-penetrance
    genes
  • Normally function as a tumor suppressor
  • Over 30 known mutations
  • 35 to 85 lifetime risk of breast cancer
  • 10 to 50 lifetime risk of ovarian cancer

15
Family history suggestive of a BRCA1 or BRCA2
mutation
  • Two first degree relatives with breast cancer,
    one of whom received the diagnosis ltage 50
  • Three or more first or second degree relatives
    with breast cancer at any age
  • Both breast and ovarian cancer among first and
    second degree relatives
  • First degree relative with bilateral breast
    cancer
  • 2 or more first or second degree relatives with
    ovarian cancer regardless of age
  • First or second degree relative with both breast
    and ovarian cancer
  • A male relative with breast cancer

16
Family history suggestive of a BRCA1 or BRCA2
mutation
  • Women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent
  • Any first degree relative with breast or ovarian
    cancer
  • Two second degree relatives with breast or
    ovarian cancer

17
  • What percentage of patients have a family history
    that is suggestive of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation?
  • 0.01
  • 0.1
  • 1
  • 10

18
  • What percentage of patients have a family
    history that is suggestive of a BRCA1 or BRCA2
    mutation?
  • 0.01
  • 0.1
  • 1 (to 2 )
  • 10

ACS 2007
19
  • In those patients who have a family history
    suggestive of an inherited mutation, what percent
    of families will actually carry this mutation?
  • 5
  • 10
  • 25
  • 50

20
  • In those patients who have a family history
    suggestive of an inherited mutation, what percent
    of families will actually carry this mutation?
  • 5
  • 10
  • 25
  • 50

ACS 2007
21
Genetic counseling and BRCA testing
  • Women with a FH at increased risk for BRCA1 or
    BRCA2 mutations should be referred for genetic
    counseling and evaluation for BRCA testing (level
    B recommendation)

USPSTF 2007
22
Genetic testing results
  • If a woman from a family with a known BRCA
    mutation tests negative, then her family history
    does not factor in to her breast cancer risk
  • In women from high-risk families by history,
    failure to find a mutation in an affected
    individual does not decrease risk

23
  • Of those women who develop breast cancer
  • 85 have no prior family history

24
High-risk factors for breast cancerrelative risk
Willey et al. Screening and follow-up of the
patient at high risk for breast cancer. Obstet
Gynecol 20071101404-16.
25
Risk assessment tools
  • Gail model
  • Uses predominantly clinical history
  • Estimates 5-yr and lifetime breast cancer risk
  • www.breastcancerprevention.org
  • National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel
    Project
  • www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool
  • National Cancer Institute
  • Claus model
  • Uses family history only
  • Tyrer-Cuzick model
  • BRCAPRO

26
Risk assessment tools-- Gail model
  • Most commonly used by clinicians
  • Least accurate
  • Based on
  • National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel
    Project
  • Breast Cancer Detection and Demonstration Project
  • Looks at
  • Current age, age at menarche, age at first live
    birth, number of prior breast biopsies, biopsy
    results, of first degree relatives with breast
    cancer, and race
  • Limitations
  • Does not account for extended family history,
    history of chest radiation, breast density
  • A calculated 5-year risk of breast cancer of
    1.67 is high-risk
  • Women age 35 or older with a 5-yr breast cancer
    risk of 1.67 or more were included in the first
    breast cancer chemoprevention trial

27
Sample Gail model calculation
  • Hx of breast cancer, DCIS, or LCIS No
  • Womans age 36
  • Age of menarche 12 to 13
  • Age at first birth of child gt30
  • First-degree relatives with breast cancer 0
  • Hx of breast biopsy No
  • Race White
  • 5 year risk
  • This patient 0.5
  • Average patient 0.3
  • Lifetime risk
  • This patient 13.8
  • Average patient 12.5

28
Risk assessment tools-- Claus model
  • Includes
  • Number of maternal and paternal first and
    second-degree relatives with breast cancer
  • Their age at diagnosis

29
Sample Claus model calculation
  • Number of first degree relatives with breast
    cancer 0
  • Number of second degree relatives with breast
    cancer 1
  • Age at diagnosis 55
  • Risk of breast cancer
  • By age 39 --gt 0.2
  • By age 49 --gt 1.3
  • By age 59 --gt 3.4
  • By age 69 --gt 6.3
  • By age 79 --gt 9.0

30
(No Transcript)
31
Breast cancer screening
  • Screening has significantly contributed to a
    23.5 decline in breast cancer mortality from
    1990 to 2000

National Cancer Institute 2007
32
Breast cancer screening-- harms and benefits
  • Potential benefits
  • Earlier diagnosis
  • Decreased mortality
  • Potential harms
  • False-positive results
  • Unnecessary biopsies
  • Increased anxiety
  • Increased cost
  • Inconvenience
  • Overtreatment
  • Overdiagnosis occurs mostly with DCIS
  • Less than 50 of DCIS becomes invasive, but
    everyone gets treated

33
Breast cancer screening--methods
  • Self breast exam (SBE)
  • Clinical breast exam (CBE)
  • Standard mammography
  • MRI

34
Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient--SBE
  • Most women do not regularly perform
  • If they do perform, most do it incorrectly
  • The practice of regular breast self-exam by
    trained women does not reduce breast cancer
    mortality
  • Evidence from 2 large RCTs
  • Randomized trial of breast self-examination in
    Shanghai final results. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002.
  • Breast self-examination and death from breast
    cancer a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2003.

35
Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient--SBE
  • Cochrane review 2003
  • Conclusions
  • SBE has no beneficial effect
  • Increases the number of biopsies
  • Evidence of harm
  • Recommendation
  • Women should NOT perform SBE

36
Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient-- SBE
  • USPSTF 2007
  • Insufficient evidence to recommend for or against
    breast self-examination
  • ACS 2007
  • Monthly breast self-examination optional at any
    age 20 or older

37
Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient-- SBE
  • If women choose to perform breast
    self-examination after being informed of the lack
    of benefit and potential harms, the physician
    should train the patient in appropriate
    technique, timing, and follow-up.
  • Knutson D, Steiner E. Screening for breast
    cancer current recommendations and future
    directions. Am Fam Phys 200751660-6.

38
Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient--SBE
  • Self breast-exam at any age
  • Not supported by the evidence
  • Physicians should discourage, or at least not
    encourage
  • If patients want to perform, should be taught the
    appropriate way to perform the exam

Harris, R. Screening for breast cancer what to
do with the evidence. Am Fam Phys 200751623-4.
39
Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient-- CBE
  • Sensitivity 50 at best
  • 5 to 10 of breast cancers detected only by CBE
  • (not detected by mammogram)
  • USPSTF 2007
  • Insufficient evidence to recommend for or against
    CBE
  • ACS 2007
  • CBE every 3 yrs ages 20 to 39
  • CBE annually age 40 and older

40
Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient--CBE
  • Age 20 to 39
  • Even necessary?
  • Every 3 years?
  • Age 40 to 49
  • Benefits and harms approximately equal
  • May discuss, but do not need to actively
    encourage
  • Every 1 to 2 years, if at all
  • Age 50 to 70
  • Encourage every year
  • Every 2 years acceptable
  • After age 70
  • Balance of benefits and harms uncertain, take
    patients general health and life expectancy into
    consideration

Harris, R. Screening for breast cancer what to
do with the evidence. Am Fam Phys 200751623-4.
41
Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient-- standard mammography
  • Sensitivity to detect breast cancer is between
    60 to 90
  • Less sensitive
  • in younger women (ltage 40)
  • in women with dense breasts
  • in tumors associated with BRCA1 or 2
  • Positive predictive value is higher in women who
    are high-risk

42
Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient-- standard mammography
  • Women age 40 to 49
  • reduces breast cancer mortality 15
  • Number needed to screen to prevent one breast
    cancer death after 14 years 1,792
  • Women age 50 to 69
  • reduces breast cancer mortality 22
  • Number needed to screen to prevent one breast
    cancer death after 14 years 838
  • Humphrey et al. Breast cancer screening a
    summary of the evidence from the USPSTF. Ann
    Intern Med 2002137347-60.

43
Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient-- standard mammography
  • Cochrane review (2001)
  • Meta-analysis concluded that screening for breast
    cancer with mammography is unjustified
  • USPSTF (2007)
  • Meta-analysis using many of the same trials
  • For women of average risk, recommended screening
    mammography (B recommendation)
  • Every one to two years for women ages 40 to 49
  • Every year for women age 50 and older
  • Little evidence to suggest this is better than
    every 2 yrs
  • ACS (2007)
  • Every year for women age 40 and older

44
Breast cancer screening in the average risk
patient-- mammogram
  • Age 40 to 49
  • Benefits and harms approximately equal
  • May discuss, but do not need to actively
    encourage
  • Every 1 to 2 years, if at all
  • Age 50 to 70
  • Encourage
  • Every 2 years acceptable
  • After age 70
  • Balance of benefits and harms uncertain, take
    patients general health and life expectancy into
    consideration

Harris, R. Screening for breast cancer what to
do with the evidence. Am Fam Phys 200751623-4.
45
Breast cancer screening-- MRI
  • Not recommended for average risk patients
  • Too expensive for screening all patients
  • Availability issues
  • More sensitive (but less specific) than
    mammography in high-risk women
  • Sensitivity of 71 to 100 vs 16 to 40 for
    mammogram in high-risk women
  • Particularly more sensitive with dense breasts
  • Tumors found are smaller and earlier
  • Combination of mammography and MRI is better than
    either alone for detection
  • No data yet on mortality reduction

46
ACS indications for annual breast cancer
screening with MRI
  • Women age 30 or older with any of the following
    should be screened yearly
  • Patient with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation
  • First degree relative with BRCA1 or BRCA2
    mutation
  • If the patient has not yet been tested
  • History of therapeutic chest radiation between
    the ages of 10 to 30 years
  • Lifetime risk of breast cancer of 20 or greater,
    based on a risk assessment calculation tool that
    depends largely on family history

47
ACS indications for annual breast cancer
screening with MRI
  • Of note what is NOT included
  • Insufficient evidence to recommend for or against
    MRI screening with other risk factors
  • Lifetime risk of breast cancer 15-20
  • Hx of atypia/CIS/breast cancer
  • Dense breasts
  • These above items should be discussed
    individually
  • MRI screening may be recommended by expert
    opinion, but not endorsed by ACS

48
Breast cancer screening in the high-risk patient
  • SBE?
  • CBE
  • Annually or every 6 months?
  • Mammogram
  • Yearly
  • ? Age to start
  • ?Once determined they are high-risk
  • If high-risk due to family history, start 10
    years earlier than youngest affected first-degree
    relative
  • If BRCA 1 or 2 mutation in patient (or in family
    and patient not tested), start age 25
  • MRI
  • Yearly, starting at age 30, if meet ACS criteria
  • (And consider screening if other high-risk
    factors present that dont yet meet criteria,
    such as dense breasts)

49
Chemoprophylaxis of breast cancer
  • Clinicians should discuss chemoprevention with
    women at high risk for breast cancer and at low
    risk for adverse effects of chemoprevention. (B
    recommendation)
  • Clinicians should inform patients of the
    potential benefits and harms of chemoprevention
    (B recommendation)

USPSTF 2007
50
  • It isnow considered standard of care to
    evaluate breast cancer risk factor information in
    women and to counsel high-risk women about the
    options of chemoprevention
  • Newman et al. Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and
    Risk Reduction. Surg Clin N Am 87 (2007) 307-316.

51
Tamoxifen
  • Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator (SERM)
  • Competes with estrogen for estrogen receptors on
    breast cancer cells
  • Blocks estrogen uptake
  • Prevents cell growth
  • FDA-labeled for breast cancer prophylaxis in
    high-risk patients
  • gt35 yo with a Gail model 5-yr risk of 1.67
  • Dose 20 mg orally daily for 5 years

52
Tamoxifen
  • Only acts on estrogen receptor positive tumors
    (ER)
  • BRCA2 gene mutation carriers can have estrogen
    receptor positive or negative tumors
  • Tamoxifen is effective only in the subset of
    patients who are ER
  • BRCA1 gene mutation carriers are usually estrogen
    receptor negative
  • Tamoxifen is ineffective for most of these
    patients

53
Tamoxifen Prophylaxis
  • Women using tamoxifen to treat established breast
    cancer found to have a 47 lower risk of a second
    primary breast cancer compared to patients not on
    tamoxifen
  • Prompted the first large chemoprevention trial in
    the US, the NSABP P-1 study in 1998
  • Prospective, randomized
  • Tamoxifen vs placebo for 5 yrs
  • gt13,000 high-risk women enrolled
  • Inclusion criteria
  • Age 60 or greater,
  • Or age 35-59 with a Gail model 5-yr risk of
    breast cancer of 1.67
  • Or personal history of LCIS

54
Tamoxifen prophylaxis
  • Tamoxifen lowered invasive breast cancer risk by
    50
  • For ER cancers
  • No reduction in ER- cancers
  • Statistically significant
  • (95 CI 0.39-0.66)
  • The trial was unblinded early

55
Tamoxifen
  • Increased risks of
  • Uterine cancer
  • Stroke
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Thromboemboli (DVT, PE)
  • Cataracts
  • Decreased risks of
  • Osteoporosis
  • Hyperlipidemia
  • Side effects
  • Hot flashes, night sweats, irregular menses

56
Predicted benefits vs harms for 5 years of
tamoxifen per 1000 women
57
Chemoprophylaxis of breast cancer
  • Best for
  • Women in their 40s who are at increased risk for
    breast cancer and have no predisposition to
    thromboembolism
  • Women in their 50s who are at increased risk for
    breast cancer, have no predisposition to
    thromboembolism, and do not have a uterus.
  • Less beneficial for
  • Women in their 30s (less risk of breast cancer)
  • Women gt age 60 (increased risk of thromboembolism)

58
Raloxifene
  • SERM
  • FDA approved in Sept 2007 for breast cancer
    prophylaxis in postmenopausal women at high risk
  • Dose 60 mg orally daily optimal duration unknown
  • Risks similar to tamoxifen
  • Less uterine cancer and cataract risk

59
Tamoxifen vs Raloxifene
  • Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR)
  • 2006 JAMA
  • 19,000 high-risk postmenopausal women
  • Similar enrollment criteria as NSABP P-1
  • Randomized to receive either tamoxifen or
    raloxifene for 5 yrs
  • Comparable efficacy to prevent invasive breast
    cancer
  • Raloxifene also reduced the risk of invasive
    breast cancer by 50
  • Raloxifene had fewer thromboembolic events,
    cataracts, and trend for less uterine cancer
  • Similar risk of MI, stroke, and osteoporotic
    fractures

60
Aromatase inhibitors
  • Block the peripheral conversion of
    androstenedione to estrone and testosterone to
    estradiol
  • Not yet approved for prophylaxis
  • Anastrazole, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination
    (ATAC) trial (Lancet 2002)
  • Multicenter, international, double-blind, RCT
  • 9,366 postmenopausal women with early stage
    breast cancer
  • After 33 months statistically significant gt50
    reduction in contralateral primary invasive
    breast cancers in the anastrazole alone group

61
(No Transcript)
62
Prophylactic oophorectomy
  • In women who have a known BRCA mutation,
    prophylactic oophorectomy can decrease breast
    cancer incidence by 50
  • Rebbeck et al. Breast cancer risk after
    bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1
    mutation carriers, J Natl cancer Inst
    199991(17)1475-9.
  • Insufficient evidence regarding mortality benefit
  • Adverse effects
  • Premature menopause
  • Increased risks of osteoporosis, cardiovascular
    disease

63
Prophylactic mastectomy
  • Retrospective review of Mayo Clinic database
  • 214 prophylactic mastectomy patients with
    high-risk family history
  • Controls were 403 sisters of these patients
  • Median f/u of 14 yrs
  • 90 reduction in breast cancer incidence and
    mortality
  • Hartman et al. Efficacy of bilateral
    prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family
    history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med
    1999340(2)77-84.
  • Further analysis performed when BRCA testing
    available
  • Similar risk reduction in subset of patients with
    BRCA mutation
  • Hartman et al. Efficacy of bilateral
    prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene
    mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst
    200193(21)1633-7.
  • Insufficient evidence regarding mortality benefit

64
Case 1
  • A 38 yo female patient presents for her annual
    physical exam. On her history, she has a
    maternal grandmother, and two paternal aunts who
    had breast cancer, all after age 50.
  • Does she have a high-risk family history?
  • Does she need referral to a genetic counselor?
  • Does she need BRCA gene mutation testing?
  • How often does she need mammograms?
  • Does she need yearly breast MRI?

65
Case 2
  • A 25 yo patient presents the same day for her
    annual physical. On family history, her mother
    died at age 35 from breast cancer. BRCA status
    of her mother is unknown. The patient has
    already seen a genetic counselor, has tested
    negative for BRCA gene mutations, and informs you
    that she needs yearly breast mammograms and MRIs.
  • Does she really need yearly MRIs?
  • Should she be offered chemoprophylaxis?
  • Should she be offered surgical prophylaxis?

66
Identifying high-risk patients in clinic
  • Any FH of breast or ovarian cancer?
  • Any 1º or 2º relative with both breast and
    ovarian cancer?
  • Any male relatives with breast cancer?
  • Any 1º relative with cancer in both breasts?
  • Two or more 1º relatives?
  • Three or more 1º or 2º relatives?
  • Both breast and ovarian cancer in 1º or 2º
    relatives?
  • Two or more 1º or 2º relatives with ovarian
    cancer?
  • Has a relative tested positive for a BRCA gene
    mutation?
  • Has the patient tested positive for a BRCA gene
    mutation?
  • Gail model 5-yr risk 1.67?
  • Lifetime risk 20
  • Therapeutic chest radiation ages 10-30?
  • HRT 10 yrs?
  • Dense breast tissue?
  • Atypical hyperplasia, LCIS, or prior breast
    cancer?

67
Summary--Management options for high-risk women
  • Surveillance
  • SBE?
  • CBE yearly (? or q 6 mos)
  • Annual mammogram (? age to start)
  • Once determined high-risk
  • 10 years younger than age of youngest affected
    first degree relative
  • Age 25 if BRCA mutation carrier
  • Annual MRI
  • Starting at age 30 if they meet the ACS criteria
  • Known BRCA mutation
  • 1º relative with a BRCA mutation, and patient
    untested
  • 20 or greater lifetime risk of breast cancer
  • Chest radiation exposure between ages 10 and 30
    yrs
  • And consider even if they dont meet ACS
    criteria
  • Lifetme breast cancer risk 15-20
  • Mammographically dense breasts
  • Personal history of atypia, LCIS, breast cancer

68
Summary--Management options for high-risk women
  • Genetic testing
  • If high-risk based on family history
  • To help guide surveillance and prophylaxis
  • Chemoprophylaxis
  • If BRCA mutation carrier
  • If Gail 5-yr risk 1.67
  • Use of tamoxifen or raloxifene
  • Surgical prophylaxis
  • If BRCA mutation carrier
  • Mastectomy and/or oophorectomy

69
References
  • ACS Recommendations on MRI and mammography for
    breast cancer screening. Am Fam Phys
    200751715-6.
  • Breast cancer facts and figures. ACS 2007-2008.
  • Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. USPSTF
    2007.
  • Harris, R. Screening for breast cancer what to
    do with the evidence. Am Fam Phys 200751623-4.
  • Kutson D, Steiner E. Screening for breast
    cancer Current Recommendations and Future
    Directions. Am Fam Phys 200751660-6.
  • Newman LA, Vogel VG. Breast Cancer Risk
    Assessment and Risk Reduction. Surg Clin N Am 87
    (2007) 307-316.
  • Saslow D et al. American Cancer Society
    Guideline for Breast Screening with MRI as an
    adjunt to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007
    5775-89.
  • Update on Breast Cancer Risk Reduction. Cedars
    Sinai Medical Center. 2006.
  • Willey S, Costanza C. Screening and follow-up of
    the patient at high-risk for breast cancer.
    Obstet gynecol 20071101404-16.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com