Metropolitan GeoGovernance: Institutional Roles, Jurisdictional Proximity, and Interjurisdictional C - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Metropolitan GeoGovernance: Institutional Roles, Jurisdictional Proximity, and Interjurisdictional C

Description:

Type of Official (mayor, councilmember, city manager, department director) ... Governmental Role Matters (mayor) Location Matters (distance) 5 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: maxwe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Metropolitan GeoGovernance: Institutional Roles, Jurisdictional Proximity, and Interjurisdictional C


1
Metropolitan Geo-Governance Institutional Roles,
Jurisdictional Proximity, and Interjurisdictional
Cooperation
  • David S.T. Matkin
  • H. George Frederickson
  • University of Kansas

2
Agenda
  • Metropolitan Chaos
  • The Languages of Collaboration
  • The Kanizsa Square
  • Our Study
  • Findings
  • Implications

3
The Kansas City Metro - Chaos?
4
The Languages of Collaboration
  • Frederickson Administrative Conjunction
  • Thurmaier Wood Picket Fence Regionalism
  • Feiock Institutional Collective Action
  • Agranoff McGuire Collaborative Management
  • Paquet - Geo-Governance

5
The Kanizsa Square
6
The Kanizsa Square
  • Jurisdictions
  • Borders
  • Governmental Legitimacy
  • Resources-Taxes-Expenditures
  • Elections
  • Staff
  • Accountability

7
The Kanizsa Square
  • In the Kanizsa Square
  • Voluntary
  • Varying levels of order
  • Varying levels of performance
  • Alliances
  • Collaboration
  • Networks
  • Associations

8
The Kansas Square
9
Our Study The Questionnaire
Hometown Scenario An Opportunity to Participate
in a Regional Cooperative
1st Decision
Additional Info significant benefit
Additional Info slight benefit
2nd Decision
10
Our Models Dependent Variables
  • Dependent Variables
  • Decision to Participate (Ordinal Scale, 1 to 7)
  • Change in Decision (2nd Decision 1st Decision)
  • Ordered Logit Regression

11
Our Models Independent Variables
  • Independent Variables
  • Additional Information (significant or slight
    benefit)
  • Type of Official (mayor, councilmember, city
    manager, department director)
  • Years in Current Position
  • Time Engaged on Regional Programs/Issues
  • Frequency of Meeting with Regional Counterparts
  • Distance from Core City Center (miles)
  • Percentage of Regional Population (ln)
  • Geographic Location in Kansas City Region
  • County
  • Gender
  • Age
  • Education Level

12
Our Findings Decisions to Cooperate
Experience with interjurisdictional cooperation
matters Location Matters Governmental Role
Matters (mayor)
Dont Cooperate
Cooperate
5
Location Matters (distance)
13
Our Findings Change in Decision
Risks and Incentives (significant benefits)
Less Willing To Cooperate
More Willing To Cooperate
-2
Governmental Roles Matters (mayor)
14
Implications
  • Who should we expect to cooperate?
  • How can cooperation be encouraged?
  • What is the role of democratic values in regional
    cooperation?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com