Roll Back Malaria: Why it has far failed What should be done PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 16
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Roll Back Malaria: Why it has far failed What should be done


1
Roll Back MalariaWhy it has far failed?What
should be done?
  • Dr A Kochi
  • Director, Global Malaria Programme
  • WHO/Geneva

2
Trend of Malaria Deaths
3.0
2.0
Annual Deaths from Malaria (millions)
1.0
(R.Carter,1999)
0.1
1900 1930 1950
1970 1990 2000
3
Malaria cases by region in 2002 (estimates)
4
The RBM Partnership (history)
Roll Back Malaria - launched in 1998 as a high
profile health initiative by founding partners
WHO, UNDP, UNICEF and the World Bank With the
primary goal of halving the mortality by 2010 and
75 by 2015
www.rbm.who.int
5
What has happened since 1998
  • New tools (ACT, LLITN, RDT, etc.)
  • Increasing visibility and Money
  • UK 60M to RBM/WHO, a big amount of money to
    AFRO/WHO, etc.
  • Increase in research money (Gates Foundation,
    NIAID, bilateral funds...)
  • GFATM
  • Bilateral (Japan, Italy, US)
  • World Bank

6
Abuja Targets
  • Abuja coverage targets, from the African Summit
    on Roll Back Malaria, April 2000, by 2005
  • At least 60 of those suffering from malaria
    should be able to access and use correct,
    affordable and appropriate treatment within 24
    hours of the onset of symptoms.
  • At least 60 of those at risk of malaria,
    particularly pregnant women and children under 5
    years of age, should benefit from suitable
    personal and community protective measures such
    ITNs.
  • At least 60 of all pregnant women who are at
    risk of malaria, especially those in their first
    pregnancies, should receive IPT.
  • At least 15 of government budget should be
    allocated to health sector

7
Where are we now?
  • Very weak monitoring and evaluation
  • Only Eritrea seems to be achieving targets
  • Many African countries are far short
  • Southern African countries started progressing
    partly due to Global Fund money and WHO's
    technical assistance

8
Access to Prompt and Effective Treatment
  • CoverageChildren under 5 medium 50 (3-69)
  • Based on 35 national surveys (1998-2004)
  • Most of the treatments could not be considered
    effective
  • (chloroquine, after 24 hours, incorrect dosage)

9
Insecticide-treated bednets (ITN)
  • Children under 5 (coverage as found in 45
    country surveys)
  • Eritrea 81
  • Togo 63
  • Other countries 3
  • But coverage of any net (untreated) could be up
    to 30.
  • Pregnant women
  • ITN coverage (8 national survey) 3

10
Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS)
  • Implemented in 17 Southern and West African
    countries
  • Coverage
  • 2.7 million households (1999)
  • 4 million households (2003)

11
Intermittent Preventive Therapy (IPT) in pregnancy
  • 29 countries adopted IPT policy
  • 22 countries are implementing IPT
  • 6 countries achieved more than 60 coverage

12
Why did RBM fail to achieve its goals?
  • Weak WHO leadership / dysfunctional RBM
    Partnership
  • Wrong Technical Policy (monotherapy with CQ, SP
    versus ACT ITN, IRS)
  • Lack of "clear" strategy
  • Limited technical expertise in countries and
    internationally
  • No effective monitoring and evaluation

13
What should be done?
  • Strong WHO leadership
  • Right technical policy
  • Treatment done
  • IRS coming soon
  • ITN coming soon
  • Develop "clear" strategies including simple but
    effective Monitoring and Evaluation System and
    "ideology-free" programme management

14
What should be done?
  • Develop the critical mass of technical expertise
    (national and international)
  • to effectively implement the strategy
  • Opportunistic but strategic allience between
    technical expertise, money, and politics for
    country operations 15 TB model
  • Research to be expanded, more focused and
    innovative
  • Partnership fix the current one orcreate a new
    one?

15
How UK can help?
  • Current situation in the UK (my understanding)
  • Big money for GFATM
  • Big money for RD for malaria
  • No malaria specific bilateral health projects
  • No malaria specific financial support to
    technical agencies
  • Attempt to fix the current RBM Partnership

16
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com