Title: Roll Back Malaria: Why it has far failed What should be done
1Roll Back MalariaWhy it has far failed?What
should be done?
- Dr A Kochi
- Director, Global Malaria Programme
- WHO/Geneva
2Trend of Malaria Deaths
3.0
2.0
Annual Deaths from Malaria (millions)
1.0
(R.Carter,1999)
0.1
1900 1930 1950
1970 1990 2000
3Malaria cases by region in 2002 (estimates)
4 The RBM Partnership (history)
Roll Back Malaria - launched in 1998 as a high
profile health initiative by founding partners
WHO, UNDP, UNICEF and the World Bank With the
primary goal of halving the mortality by 2010 and
75 by 2015
www.rbm.who.int
5What has happened since 1998
- New tools (ACT, LLITN, RDT, etc.)
- Increasing visibility and Money
- UK 60M to RBM/WHO, a big amount of money to
AFRO/WHO, etc. - Increase in research money (Gates Foundation,
NIAID, bilateral funds...) - GFATM
- Bilateral (Japan, Italy, US)
- World Bank
6Abuja Targets
- Abuja coverage targets, from the African Summit
on Roll Back Malaria, April 2000, by 2005 - At least 60 of those suffering from malaria
should be able to access and use correct,
affordable and appropriate treatment within 24
hours of the onset of symptoms. - At least 60 of those at risk of malaria,
particularly pregnant women and children under 5
years of age, should benefit from suitable
personal and community protective measures such
ITNs. - At least 60 of all pregnant women who are at
risk of malaria, especially those in their first
pregnancies, should receive IPT. - At least 15 of government budget should be
allocated to health sector
7Where are we now?
- Very weak monitoring and evaluation
- Only Eritrea seems to be achieving targets
- Many African countries are far short
- Southern African countries started progressing
partly due to Global Fund money and WHO's
technical assistance
8Access to Prompt and Effective Treatment
- CoverageChildren under 5 medium 50 (3-69)
- Based on 35 national surveys (1998-2004)
- Most of the treatments could not be considered
effective - (chloroquine, after 24 hours, incorrect dosage)
9Insecticide-treated bednets (ITN)
- Children under 5 (coverage as found in 45
country surveys) - Eritrea 81
- Togo 63
- Other countries 3
- But coverage of any net (untreated) could be up
to 30. - Pregnant women
- ITN coverage (8 national survey) 3
10Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS)
- Implemented in 17 Southern and West African
countries - Coverage
- 2.7 million households (1999)
- 4 million households (2003)
11Intermittent Preventive Therapy (IPT) in pregnancy
- 29 countries adopted IPT policy
- 22 countries are implementing IPT
- 6 countries achieved more than 60 coverage
12Why did RBM fail to achieve its goals?
- Weak WHO leadership / dysfunctional RBM
Partnership - Wrong Technical Policy (monotherapy with CQ, SP
versus ACT ITN, IRS) - Lack of "clear" strategy
- Limited technical expertise in countries and
internationally - No effective monitoring and evaluation
13What should be done?
- Strong WHO leadership
- Right technical policy
- Treatment done
- IRS coming soon
- ITN coming soon
- Develop "clear" strategies including simple but
effective Monitoring and Evaluation System and
"ideology-free" programme management
14What should be done?
- Develop the critical mass of technical expertise
(national and international) - to effectively implement the strategy
- Opportunistic but strategic allience between
technical expertise, money, and politics for
country operations 15 TB model - Research to be expanded, more focused and
innovative - Partnership fix the current one orcreate a new
one?
15How UK can help?
- Current situation in the UK (my understanding)
- Big money for GFATM
- Big money for RD for malaria
- No malaria specific bilateral health projects
- No malaria specific financial support to
technical agencies - Attempt to fix the current RBM Partnership
16(No Transcript)