On Identification of Face Invariance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

On Identification of Face Invariance

Description:

Faces with intra-subject variations in pose, illumination, expression, ... No single visible feature such as eyes, ear or ... 3.Mug-shot detection. References: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: amr65
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: On Identification of Face Invariance


1
On Identification of Face Invariance
  • Devi Vijayan
  • M.Tech Computer Vision Image Processing
  • Amrita School of Engineering

2
Outline
  • Motivation
  • Objective
  • Approach
  • Future Work

3
Intra - class Variability
  • Faces with intra-subject variations in pose,
    illumination, expression, accessories, color,
    occlusions, and brightness.

4
Inter - class similarity
  • Different persons may have very similar
    appearance.

5
Objective To identify the invariant facial
factors
Hypothesis
  • No single visible feature such as eyes, ear or
    nose can identify though they make vital
    contribution to identification of face
    invariance.
  • Lower order combinations of these features
    termed as Face Invariant Factors (FIF).

6
Approach
  • A hybrid model that combines the properties of
    Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Geometric
    Feature based Techniques.
  • Randomized higher-order eigenfaces based model.

7

Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

1. Acquire a set of M fixed sized face images,
known as the training set.

N X N
N2 x 1

.
N2 X 10
1 2 ..10
8
PCA 1
  • 2 Find the average face mof the face set.
  • ? 1/M (?n Gn)
    n 1,2..M
  • 3 Find the deviation of each face image from the
    mean ,
  • F i G i -? i 1,2 M

Averaging
. .
9
PCA 2
  • 4. Find the Covariance matrix C.
  • C 1 / M ?i ?i ? i T
    i 1,2 M
  • Another way of representing the covariance matrix
    is by writing
  • A F 1, F 2......... F M
  • C 1 / M ? i A AT

X
N2 X 10
10 X N2
N2 x N2
10
PCA 3
  • If the number of data points in the image space
    is less than the dimension of the space (M lt N2),
    there will be only M-1, rather than N2,
    meaningful eigenvectors.
  • Construct a matrix L ATA, of M x M dimension
    ,and find M eigenvectors
  • Corresponding eigenvalues allow us to rank the
    eigenvectors according to the significance.

x
10 x 10
N2 x 10
10 x N2
11
PCA 4
Sorting
Find Eigen vectors
10 x 10
Plot of Eigenvectors
12
When a new test image comes,
? Test image
  • Project it into face space
  • Determine which image provides the best
    description of input image.
  • This is done by minimizing the Euclidean
    distance .

13
Experiment -1. Capture the invariance from
different persons. (Dataset
1)
Reconstructed image
Training set- Data set 1
Test image
14
? Test image
Images
Reconstructed image
15
Experiment -2. Capture invariance from same
person under different disguises.
(Dataset-2)
Training Set
Test Image
Converged image
16
Experiment 2 1







Test image









Converged image
17
Experiment -3Capturing invariance from same
person under different ages
Training Set(2, 5, 8, 28, 29, 43)
Test Set (Age-10)
18
Experiment 3 1
19
Experiment 3 2
Accuracy of convergence is 59. 25
20
Illustration of Geometric based concept
21
Illustration of Geometric based concept 1
  • Inference1 Ratio of the distances between lips
    and nose found to be invariant. (Average distance
    ratio1.215).
  • Inference2 Ratio of the area of the face to
    the forehead area seems to be more or less
    invariant. (Average area ratio5.21)
  • Inference3 The eye-to-eye distance variation
    is not maintaining a constant increment

22
Using higher order pixel information
Representation seems to be better
23
Applications 1
  • 1.Simulating Aging Effects

24
Applications 2
  • 2.Developing Caricatures
  • Caricatures of faces can be obtained by
    exaggerating their distinctive features.

25
Applications 3
  • 3.Mug-shot detection

26
References
  • 1 Roberto Brunelli and Tomaso Poggio Face
    Recognition Features versus Templates, IEEE
    Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine
    Intelligence, Vol. 15, No. 10, October 1993.
  • 2 Turk,M., and Pentland.A,Eigenfaces for
    Recognition, J. Cognitive Neuroscience
    3(1),1991, pp. 71-86.
  • 3 Peter N.Belhumeur, Joa P Hespanha, and David
    J.Kriegman, Eigenfaces vs Fisherfaces
    Recognition Using Class Specific Linear
    Projection, IEEE Transactions on Pattern
    Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol 19, No
    7,July 1997, pp. 711-720.
  • 4 A. Lanitis, C. J. Taylor, T. F. Cootes,
    Towards Automatic Simulation of Aging Effects
    on Face images, IEEE Transactions on Pattern
    Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol 24, No.4,
    April 2002,pp. 442-455.
  • 5 W, Zhao, R. Chellappa, P.J.Philips, A.
    Rosenfeld, Face Recognition A literature
    survey, ACM Computing Surveys, Volume 35, No.
    4,December 2003,pp.399-458.
  • 6 Marian Stewart Bartlett, Javier R. Movellan,
    and Terrence J. Sejnowski, Face Recognition by
    Independent Component Analysis IEEE Transactions
    on Neural Networks, Vol. 13, No.6, November2002,
    pp 1450-1464.
  • 7 Kun Peng, Liming Chen, A Robust Algorithm
    for Eye Detection on Gray Intensity Face without
    Spectacles, JCST Vol. 5 No. 3 October 2005.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com