What I learned during my Xian Vacation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

What I learned during my Xian Vacation

Description:

What I learned during my Xi'an 'Vacation' Joe Shields. Ohio University. Essay: ... New tidal disruption candidates (Gezari) 20. Homework: A to-do list ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: JosephS71
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What I learned during my Xian Vacation


1
What I learned during my Xian Vacation
Essay
  • Joe Shields
  • Ohio University

2
To make sense of it all we just need to
understand
DUST
3
Reasons to pay attention to dust
  • Dust central to understanding the torus
  • - its small, but resolved (Jaffe, Davies)
  • - its clumpy (Elitzur, Hoenig poster, )
  • - it defines the boundary of the BLR (Laor,
    Suganuma)

4
Lag time vs. Optical Luminosity with BLR lags
NIR(K-band)
Broad Emission Line
F9 Clavel et al. (89)
Rodriguez-Pascual et al. (97)
Peterson et al. (04) N3783 Reichert et al.
(94) N7469 Wanders et al. (97)
Kriss et al. (00) Collier et al.
(98) N5548 Peterson et al. (02)
Krolik et al. (1991) Peterson
Wandel. (99) Dietrich et al. (93)
Korista et al. (95) N4151 Clavel
et al. (90) Maoz et al. (91)
Kaspi et al. (96)
  • Broad-emission line lags for objects that also
    have infrared lags
  • Including Hi Lo ionization lines)

(nucleus)
N3227 Winge et al. (95) Onken et
al. (03) Shemmer et al. (04)
5
Reasons to pay attention to dust
  • Dust explains why Seyfert 2s exist
  • - obscuration of BLR as a function of
    orientation
  • - disappearance of BLR at low luminosity?
  • (Elitzur, related to wind Laor related to
    inner radius)
  • N.B. Remember Ed Morans cautionary words
    regarding
  • incidence of hidden broad-line regions
  • - strong selection/sensitivity effects (but
    getting better)
  • - absence of evidence ? evidence of absence
  • - lack of x-ray absorption is not diagnostic

6
Reasons to pay attention to dust
3. Its an essential part of the NLR - radiation
pressure on dust determines ionization
structure? (Groves) (complications star
formation, jets - Bennert, Holt, Inskip)
  • Its an important constraint on early star
    formation
  • associated with AGNs (Hamann)

6
7
Ways to probe dust in AGNs
  • IR Spectroscopic features (A. Lee, Sturm, Hao,
    Deo poster)
  • 9.7 ?m feature
  • PAHs

8
Mid-IR average spectra
(Brandl et al., 2006)
L. Hao talk
9
Ways to probe dust in AGNs
  • IR Spectroscopic features (A. Lee, Sturm, Hao,
    Deo poster)
  • 9.7 ?m feature
  • PAHs
  • XAFS in x-ray spectra (J. Lee)
  • Extinction/reddening law (Czerny) !!!!
  • Unification tests
  • - Radio galaxies quasars (Cleary, Lal, Schulz
    poster)

9
10
What Dust Cannot Explain
  • The X-ray absorber in Seyfert 1s
  • - x-ray absorber ? infrared absorber (Elitzur,
    )
  • - located on scale similar to BLR (Maiolino)
  • mid-IR emission much more extended
  • - selection effects an issue at high NH
  • Opportunities for study
  • - time-variability (Risaliti)
  • - fossil reflection (Maiolino)
  • - XRB constraints for Compton-thick sources

11
What Dust Cannot Explain
2. Differences between Seyferts and LINERs -
amazing dichotomy in BPT diagrams! (Groves)
12
Sweet Separation
Brent Groves -NLR Models
13
What Dust Cannot Explain
2. Differences between Seyferts and LINERs -
amazing dichotomy in BPT diagrams! (Groves) -
probable explanation different SEDs (Ho) - SEDs
really are different - lack of blue bump in
LINERs not extinction - see some LINERs as
UV sources (Elitzur quoting Maoz) - at low z,
MBH different (Constantin, Greene) - low L/Ledd
? ADAF or RIAF in LINERs
14
What Dust Cannot Explain
2. Differences between Seyferts and LINERs -
amazing dichotomy in BPT diagrams! (Groves) -
probable explanation different SEDs (Ho) - SEDs
really are different - lack of blue bump in
LINERs not extinction - see some LINERs as
UV sources (Elitzur quoting Maoz) - at low z,
MBH different (Constantin, Greene) - low L/Ledd
? ADAF or RIAF in LINERs Tools to probe
excitation/energetics - X-ray (Marquez) -
point sources in many cases, not always - IR
lines (Chary, Rupke)
14
15
Other New Things
  • A new composite QSO spectrum (Shang)

16
Results 1 of 3 Spectral Energy Distributions
  • Our sub-sample of 15 objects
  • Composite spectrum (UV optical mid-IR)
  • Normalized at 5600 Å
  • Clear Silicates features around 10 and 18 µm
  • Near-IR composite spectrum (Glikman et al. 2006)
  • 27 AGNs (zlt0.4)
  • 1 micron inflexion

17
Other New Things
  • A new composite QSO spectrum (Shang)
  • Clustering constraint on Seyfert companions (C.
    Li)

18
C. Li talk
19
Other New Things
  • A new composite QSO spectrum (Shang)
  • Clustering constraint on Seyfert companions (C.
    Li)
  • High-velocity HI absorption wings - tracer of
    feedback
  • (Morganti)
  • Do star formation indicators break down in
    presence
  • of luminous AGN? E.g. OII, PAHs (Levenson)
  • IMF on small scales may be skewed to high masses
  • (Nayakshin) - does this remove observable
    signatures
  • for t ? 108 yrs? (Cf. Sarzi)

19
20
Other New Things
  • New metallicity diagnostics for the NLR (Nagao)
  • M-sigma deviations at z0.37 (Malkan)
  • New tidal disruption candidates (Gezari)

20
21
Homework A to-do list
  • Clean up statistics on Sey 1/Sey 2 incidence ?
  • (Elitzur, Martinez-Sansigre)
  • (Moshe Clumpy unification becomes an issue of
    probability)
  • N.B. dont expect ratios to be same in Optical
    and X-ray

22
Clumpy Unification
0
Nc(?) N0 exp(-?2/?2)
AGN type is a viewing-dependent probability!
  • Type 1 sources from type 2 viewing, and vice
    versa
  • Flips between type 1 2 (Aretxaga et al 99)
  • f2 variations may arise from either ? or N0 or
    both

f2 depends on both ? and N0!
23
A to-do list
  • Clean up statistics on Sey 1/Sey 2 incidence ?
  • (Moshe Clumpy unification becomes an issue of
    probability)
  • Revisit X-ray absorption vs. Luminosity? (J.X.
    Wang)
  • Figure out why bars are associated with higher
    x-ray NH
  • (Maiolino)
  • Be worried about studies that use jet axis as an
    indicator
  • of torus/disk axis (Jaffe)

24
Jaffe talk - NGC 1068
25
A to-do list
  • Clean up statistics on Sey 1/Sey 2 incidence ?
  • (Moshe Clumpy unification becomes an issue of
    probability)
  • Revisit X-ray absorption vs. Luminosity? (J.X.
    Wang)
  • Figure out why bars are associated with higher
    x-ray NH
  • (Maiolino)
  • Be worried about studies that use jet axis as an
    indicator
  • of torus/disk axis (Jaffe)
  • Find more objects suitable for time-variability
    studies of
  • x-ray absorption (Risaliti)

25
26
A to-do list (continued)
  • 6. Start thinking about consequences of
    reflection of optical
  • light from torus (Gaskell)
  • 7. Worry more about aperture effects (Jaffe,
    Sturm, Prieto, )
  • 8. Gain some more insight into extinction/reddenin
    g law !
  • 9. Look for time variability in Si 9.7 ?m feature
    (Gaskell/Ogle)
  • Measure metallicities in high-z, low-L AGNs to
    address evolutionary issues (Nagao)

27
A to-do list (continued)
11.Start thinking time-domain science (LSST,
EXIST) and other opportunities with new missions
Last but not Least
Make plans to visit China again!
-The End-
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com