Baton Rouge 8-hr Ozone Modeling Technical Review Meeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Baton Rouge 8-hr Ozone Modeling Technical Review Meeting

Description:

... consistent transport corridors from midwest, Ohio Valley, south-east U.S. ... Reduced to 6 candidates. Max exceedance monitor-days at 4 key monitors ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: Env46
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Baton Rouge 8-hr Ozone Modeling Technical Review Meeting


1
Baton Rouge 8-hr Ozone ModelingTechnical Review
Meeting
  • Presentation to the
  • LDEQ/AQSD
  • 8-hr Ozone SIP Coalition
  • July 27, 2006

2
Todays Presentation
  • Conceptual Model of 8-hr Ozone
  • Episode Analysis
  • Modeling System
  • Modeling Domain
  • Emission Inventory Development
  • Area Point Sources
  • Motor Vehicles (on-road off-road)
  • Biogenics Fires

3
Todays Presentation
  • Initial/boundary conditions
  • Use of Probing Tools

4
Conceptual Model
  • Baton Rouge is a Marginal 8-hr Ozone
    nonattainment area
  • Single 2003 exceedance DV
  • LSU 86 ppb
  • Four 2005 exceedance DVs
  • LSU 96 ppb
  • 2006 exceedances
  • Will not attain standard by June 2007 as required

5
Conceptual Model
  • Likely bump-up to Moderate area
  • Attainment date June 2010
  • Spatial distribution
  • Four key exceedance monitors
  • LSU, Baker, Carville, Port Allen
  • Aligned south-to-north along river
  • Other monitors mostly outside south of Baton
    Rouge
  • Likely interaction between urban, industrial, and
    biogenic emissions

6
Conceptual Model
7
Conceptual Model
  • Temporal distribution
  • Diurnal classic 12 4 PM peaks
  • Evidence of ozone cloud transport site to site
  • No obvious late AM ROFEs or THOEs
  • Possible early PM ROFEs or THOEs
  • Weekly no clear-cut weekday/weekend dependencies
    more analysis needed
  • Seasonal trends toward late spring, early fall
    multi-day, multi-site episodes
  • In last few years, mid-summer episodes are
    typically 1-day, few sites

8
Conceptual Model
9
Conceptual Model
  • Weather requirements
  • Stagnation, light/variable winds under high
    pressure
  • Exceedances independent of wind direction
  • Clear skies
  • Temperatures do not need to be hot
  • Many exceedances in low 80s F
  • Emissions-driven, not heat-driven
  • Few prolonged hot summer episodes
  • Excessive PBL venting or Gulf breeze? Recent
    interannual climate?

10
Conceptual Model
  • Regional transport
  • Needs 2-3 day transport times
  • Recent summer episodes are too short
  • Some multi-day episodes are clearly caused by
    local stagnation, re-circulation
  • Some multi-day episodes establish consistent
    transport corridors from midwest, Ohio Valley,
    south-east U.S.
  • Choose episodes that represent mix of conditions
  • Season, meteorology, transport, WE/WD

11
Episode Analyses
  • Screened 14 episodes from 2000-2004
  • 2005 de-emphasized
  • Concern about availability of emissions data
  • Reduced to 6 candidates
  • Max exceedance monitor-days at 4 key monitors
  • Min number of modeling days
  • Different times of year
  • Recent episodes

12
Episode Analyses
  • 6 candidates
  • May 19-30, 2003 (M, Sa, W, Th)
  • September 28-30, 2004 (W, Th)
  • April 12-30, 2003 (Su, M, F, Su, M, Tu)
  • October 4-6, 2003 (Sa, Su)
  • May 4-9, 2004 (Tu, W, Th, Sa)
  • August 11 September 5, 2000 (F, Su, Th, F, Sa,
    Su, M, F, Sa, W, Th, F, Sa, Su)

13
Episode Analyses
  • Comparison to CART analysis
  • Bin 10 (22)
  • Bin 20 (24)
  • Bin 25 (33)
  • Bin 27 (10)
  • Bin 35 (11)

14
Episode Analyses
  • Final 2-3 episodes need to be selected from 6
    candidates
  • Input from advisory group
  • Consider schedule, resources, and pre-existing
    datasets
  • July 31 draft Protocol documents conceptual model
    for each of 6 episodes

15
Episode Analyses
16
Episode Analyses
17
Episode Analyses
18
Episode Analyses
19
Episode Analyses
20
Episode Analyses
21
Modeling System
  • MM5 Meteorological Model
  • Widely used to support regulatory modeling
  • EPS3 Emissions Processor
  • LDEQ is familiar with EPS
  • CAMx Air Quality Model
  • Widely used to support regulatory modeling in
    south-central U.S.
  • Full Chemistry PiG allows evaluation of HRVOC
    plumes

22
Domain Configuration
  • Regional grid (36 km) based on TCEQ
  • Intermediate grid (12 km) captures transport from
    Midwest and Southeast
  • Local grid (4 km) along Gulf Coast, including
    Houston
  • Vertical grid based on St. Louis modeling

23
Domain Configuration
24
Domain Configuration
25
Domain Configuration
26
Emission Inventories
  • Start-point inventories
  • 2002 CENRAP Base B
  • 2002 VISTAS Base G
  • 2002 MRPO Base K
  • TCEQ inventories and other datasets
  • Useful for August/September 2000 episode
  • Replace CENRAP data for Texas when available for
    other years?

27
Emission Inventories
  • 2000-2005 LDEQ data, as available
  • Stationary point, area
  • On-road VMT, MOBILE6
  • Non-road NONROAD

28
Emission Inventories
  • Inventory projections
  • Specific modeling years (2000-2004, 2009)
  • Regional based on RPOs, EPA, and TCEQ
  • Local future year projections are challenging
    due to recent events
  • EGU and other large sources
  • Use CEM as available for base case model
    performance evaluation
  • Use typical inventory rates for projected base
    and future years

29
Emission Inventories
  • Biogenics from GloBEIS
  • All grids, episode-day specific
  • Driven by
  • MM5 and/or temperature observations
  • Satellite PAR data
  • Land cover/biomass data (GIS, etc.)
  • Held constant into 2009 future year
  • Fires (wild, agricultural, prescribed)
  • As needed, as available

30
Initial/Boundary Conditions
  • Only needed on 36-km grid
  • Use 2002 VISTAS model output fields
  • Derive monthly-average diurnally-varying IC/BCs
    for base case episodes
  • Use 2009 VISTAS model output fields
  • If available, as described above
  • Otherwise, use 2002 fields

31
CAMx Probing Tools
  • Ozone Source Apportionment Technology (OSAT)
  • Determines source area/category contribution to
    ozone anywhere in the domain
  • Tracks NOx and VOC precursor emissions, ozone
    production/destruction, and initial/boundary
    conditions
  • Estimates ozone production uner NOx- or VOC
    limited conditions

32
CAMx Probing Tools
  • OSAT
  • HOWEVER it cannot quantify ozone response to NOx
    or VOC controls
  • Chemical allocation methodologies
  • OSAT standard approach
  • APCA attributes ozone production to
    anthropogenic (controllable) sources only
  • GOAT tracks ozone based on where it formed, not
    where precursors were emitted

33
CAMx Probing Tools
  • PM Source Apportionment Technology (PSAT)
  • Parallel to OSAT operation
  • Tracks user-defined groups of species for
    sulfate, nitrate, ammonium, SOA, Mercury, and
    primary PM

34
CAMx Probing Tools
  • Decoupled Direct Method (DDM) for sensitivity
    analysis
  • Calculates first-order concentration sensitivity
    to emissions, initial/boundary conditions
  • Allows estimates of effects of emission changes
  • Allows ranking of source region/ categories by
    their importance to ozone formation

35
CAMx Probing Tools
  • DDM
  • Slower than OSAT, but
  • Provides information for all species (not just
    ozone)
  • More flexible in selecting which parameters to
    track
  • Better estimate of small emission perturbation
    impacts (e.g., control measures)
  • Includes sensitivity from non-linear secondary
    effects

36
CAMx Probing Tools
  • Process Analysis (PA)
  • Designed to provide in-depth analyses of all
    physical and chemical processes operating in
    model
  • Operates on user-defined species and any portion
    of the modeling grid
  • Appropriate for evaluating base case performance
  • Recent UNC enhancements

37
CAMx Probing Tools
  • PA
  • Three components
  • Integrated Process Rate (IPR) provides detailed
    process rate information for each physical
    process (emissions, advection, diffusion,
    chemistry, deposition)
  • Integrated Reaction Rate (IRR) provides detailed
    reaction rate information for all chemical
    reactions
  • Chemical Process Analysis (CPA) like IRR, but
    designed to be more user-friendly and accessible

38
CAMx Probing Tools
  • Reactive Tracers (RTRAC)
  • Tracks multiple independent reactive gas and
    particle tracers
  • Tracers operate in parallel to the CAMx host
    model
  • Allows for several generations of products
  • Decay/production uses standard gas-phase
    mechanism photolysis and oxidants
  • Can output tracer decay rates to a separate
    Lagrangian model for fenceline dispersion
    calculations

39
CAMx Probing Tools
  • RTRAC
  • Designed for primarily for air toxics
  • Assumes RTRAC species have minimal impact on
    photochemistry
  • Each tracer can be tagged for source
    apportionment
  • RTRAC works with IRON PIG
  • An optional sampling grid capability passively
    samples near-source sub-grid RTRAC surface
    concentrations within reactive PiG plumes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com