Title: Houstons Transit Referendum Held on November 4, 2003
1Houstons Transit Referendum Held on November 4,
2003
- Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County,
Texas
2METRO Referendum History
- 1979 -- Voters approved the creation of METRO
- 1983 -- Voters disapproved bonding authority
for 18 miles of heavy rail - 1988 Voters approved Mobility Plan, LRT, and
25 for General Mobility - 2001 Voters approved continuation of METRORail
starter line construction and requirement to hold
a referendum for extensions - 2003 METRO Solutions Referendum asks voters for
640 million bonding authority and future
extensions to the system
3METROs November 4, 2003 asked voters whether to
authorize
- A Transit System Plan that includes 72 additional
miles of rail and - expansion of bus services
- Issuance of up to 640 million
- in bonds without raising taxes
- Extension of funding for street improvements
through 2014
4Common thought is that you have to have these
elements to win a referendum
- A private sector champion
- Little or no opposition
- Rail in operation
- Strong mayor
5Houston METRO did not have any of these elements
6METRO did not have a champion.In fact, most
civic leaders tried to stay away with a ten foot
pole
- It became a partisan issue with almost all
elected Republicans lining up against METRO
7METRO had strong opposition
- Great criticism by elected officials (Members of
Congress) - Questioned the plan, METROs finances, tried to
diminish METROs credibility - Well financed opposition campaign
- Criticism for months on talk radio
8METRO did not have rail running
- 7.5 mile locally funded starter light rail line
goes into operation on January 1, 2004. - Was used as an argument against the bigger plan
by saying mismanaged, construction mess, does not
go anywhere
9Opposition Campaign
- Well Funded
- Strong Political Figures
- Republican Party Support
- Concentrated on running a negative campaign
- TV Radio commercials
- Massive Direct Mail
10Opposition CampaignDirect Mail
11Opposition CampaignDirect Mail
12Opposition Campaign TV Ads
13Opposition Campaign TV Ads
14METRO Educational Campaign
- Public Meetings
- TV Radio Commercials
- Direct mail
- Community Groups
15Message Points METRO Used In All Speeches,
Brochures, TV Radio Ads
- METRO Solutions includes 72 miles of rail and
extensive expansion of bus services - Voters will be able to hold METRO accountable
- METRO will extend until 2014 its funding
assistance to local governments for street
improvements and related projects - METRO cannot raise taxes
16METROs Public Education TV Ads
17METROs Public Education TV Ads
18METROs Public Education TV Ads
19Success was due to
- Public involvement campaign by METRO staff
- Negotiated a compromise plan with various
business community (Greater Houston Partnership) - People in Houston were aware of the issue because
of major media coverage and advertisements - Opinion polls showed traffic congestion was the
1 issue (Public was ready for a change and felt
something needed to be done)
20Success was due to (Continued)
- Zeroing in on key message points through an
extensive TV, radio, and print education
initiative - Focused pro-METRO campaign organization that
complimented the agencys efforts - Strong voter turnout in the City of Houston due
to open seat in mayors race - Neutralization of strong anti-rail figure (former
mayor)
21The turning point of success was when METRO
(agency campaign) put the opposition on the
defensive
- Anti-campaign claimed to be a non-profit
education organization and would not reveal
contributors - Questioned credibility because of false
allegations regarding FTA funding
22Things Learned
- In Houston, public opinion on rail in general
remains significantly higher than election
results (66), but the opposition - Successfully cast doubt on METROs credibility
- Opposition successfully cast doubt on the
proposed plan with their cost too much, does too
little campaign
23Houstons Transit Referendum Held on November 4,
2003
- Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County,
Texas