Houstons Transit Referendum Held on November 4, 2003 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Houstons Transit Referendum Held on November 4, 2003

Description:

Strong Political Figures. Republican Party Support ... People in Houston were aware of the issue because of major media coverage and advertisements ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: JC957
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Houstons Transit Referendum Held on November 4, 2003


1
Houstons Transit Referendum Held on November 4,
2003
  • Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County,
    Texas

2
METRO Referendum History
  • 1979 -- Voters approved the creation of METRO
  • 1983 -- Voters disapproved bonding authority
    for 18 miles of heavy rail
  • 1988 Voters approved Mobility Plan, LRT, and
    25 for General Mobility
  • 2001 Voters approved continuation of METRORail
    starter line construction and requirement to hold
    a referendum for extensions
  • 2003 METRO Solutions Referendum asks voters for
    640 million bonding authority and future
    extensions to the system

3
METROs November 4, 2003 asked voters whether to
authorize
  • A Transit System Plan that includes 72 additional
    miles of rail and
  • expansion of bus services
  • Issuance of up to 640 million
  • in bonds without raising taxes
  • Extension of funding for street improvements
    through 2014

4
Common thought is that you have to have these
elements to win a referendum
  • A private sector champion
  • Little or no opposition
  • Rail in operation
  • Strong mayor

5
Houston METRO did not have any of these elements
6
METRO did not have a champion.In fact, most
civic leaders tried to stay away with a ten foot
pole
  • It became a partisan issue with almost all
    elected Republicans lining up against METRO

7
METRO had strong opposition
  • Great criticism by elected officials (Members of
    Congress)
  • Questioned the plan, METROs finances, tried to
    diminish METROs credibility
  • Well financed opposition campaign
  • Criticism for months on talk radio

8
METRO did not have rail running
  • 7.5 mile locally funded starter light rail line
    goes into operation on January 1, 2004.
  • Was used as an argument against the bigger plan
    by saying mismanaged, construction mess, does not
    go anywhere

9
Opposition Campaign
  • Well Funded
  • Strong Political Figures
  • Republican Party Support
  • Concentrated on running a negative campaign
  • TV Radio commercials
  • Massive Direct Mail

10
Opposition CampaignDirect Mail
11
Opposition CampaignDirect Mail
12
Opposition Campaign TV Ads
13
Opposition Campaign TV Ads
14
METRO Educational Campaign
  • Public Meetings
  • TV Radio Commercials
  • Direct mail
  • Community Groups

15
Message Points METRO Used In All Speeches,
Brochures, TV Radio Ads
  • METRO Solutions includes 72 miles of rail and
    extensive expansion of bus services
  • Voters will be able to hold METRO accountable
  • METRO will extend until 2014 its funding
    assistance to local governments for street
    improvements and related projects
  • METRO cannot raise taxes

16
METROs Public Education TV Ads
17
METROs Public Education TV Ads
18
METROs Public Education TV Ads
19
Success was due to
  • Public involvement campaign by METRO staff
  • Negotiated a compromise plan with various
    business community (Greater Houston Partnership)
  • People in Houston were aware of the issue because
    of major media coverage and advertisements
  • Opinion polls showed traffic congestion was the
    1 issue (Public was ready for a change and felt
    something needed to be done)

20
Success was due to (Continued)
  • Zeroing in on key message points through an
    extensive TV, radio, and print education
    initiative
  • Focused pro-METRO campaign organization that
    complimented the agencys efforts
  • Strong voter turnout in the City of Houston due
    to open seat in mayors race
  • Neutralization of strong anti-rail figure (former
    mayor)

21
The turning point of success was when METRO
(agency campaign) put the opposition on the
defensive
  • Anti-campaign claimed to be a non-profit
    education organization and would not reveal
    contributors
  • Questioned credibility because of false
    allegations regarding FTA funding

22
Things Learned
  • In Houston, public opinion on rail in general
    remains significantly higher than election
    results (66), but the opposition
  • Successfully cast doubt on METROs credibility
  • Opposition successfully cast doubt on the
    proposed plan with their cost too much, does too
    little campaign

23
Houstons Transit Referendum Held on November 4,
2003
  • Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County,
    Texas
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com