Title: Protecting the poor from the current crisis
1Protecting the poor from the current crisis
- Hassan Zaman
- The World Bank
- IFPRI/Cornell Symposium
- April 24th, 2009
- (several slides derived from earlier joint
presentation with M. Grosh for a technical
briefing to the World Bank Board on April 21st,
2009)
2Current crisis transmitting macro shocks to
households impacts
- Falling export demand / commodity prices / FDI ?
rising unemployment and falling real wages - Copper mines closures in Zambia and Mongolia
- 25 million jobs lost in China alone
- Indonesia 1998 crisis led to 20-30 fall in real
wages - Lower remittances ? falling incomes
- Clear slowdown (5-8 decline projected for 2009)
- Credit crunch ?negative wealth effect
(especially ECA) - Fiscal squeeze on essential public services when
people switching away from private providers and
greater need for safety net spending
3All of which adds up to more people living in
poverty
- Growth slowdown means 53 million fewer people
will escape poverty in the developing world at
the 1.25/day line (65 more million people at the
2/day line) - In Sub-Saharan Africa the growth slowdown
essentially eliminates all progress in reducing
the number of poor between 2008 and 2009 - In Europe and Central Asia region, larger growth
slowdowns may lead to actual increases in the
poverty rate of 0.5 to 2 percentage points,
depending on the severity of the negative growth
scenario - Bulgaria increase of 0.5 to 1.1 percentage
points - Turkey increase of 1.5 percentage points
4...and to worsening MDG outcomes
Progress towards MDGs --- all developing
countries
- Developing countries already lagging on MDGs
before crisis - Earlier crises had significant negative impacts
on infant mortality especially that of girls
infant deaths may be 200,000-400,000 per year
higher between 2009 and 2015 than in absence of
crisis - Evidence on impact of crises on schooling more
ambiguous and will vary across countries
depending on incomes
5Impacts reinforced, or sometimes, compensated by
food prices
- Current prices of key staples lower compared to
last year in many countries, reflecting global
trends e.g. Bangladesh, price of coarse rice
almost half that of April 2008 - On the other hand for various reasons prices in
several countries remains high (e.g. Chad, El
Salvador, Tajikistan, Sudan) - Household level impacts potentially most severe
in the subset hit by economic crisis and
continuing rise in food prices -
6Safety nets are part of a larger policy menu
- Need to balance short-term objectives
- Sustaining aggregate demand (fiscal stimulus)
- Addressing declining private consumption
- Closing or reducing the output gap
- Mitigating crisis impacts
- Supporting/restoring the financial sector
- Assisting vulnerable groups (safety nets)
- While protecting medium-term growth and
development goals - Careful management of fiscal deficit
- Ensuring spending on health, education, and
infrastructure and development of
cost-effective and flexible safety net system
7Challenges for safety nets during a crisis
- Fiscal space is constrained and multiple
pressures on budget - Targeting
- Existing systems geared to chronic poor, who do
need additional support during crisis - Others (e.g. returning migrants, newly
unemployed) may need help but are more difficult
to target - Time it takes time to build adequate
administrative structures yet people need
immediate response - Strong political economy pressures to
retain/expand various subsidies especially where
targeted programs are small - Institutions SSN programs are often spread
throughout government, with no effective
coordinating leadership
8Financing Social Safety Nets
- Well-designed system do not need to be expensive
- Mexicos Oportunidades cost only 0.4 of GDP
- But current levels of spending (average 1-2 of
GDP) on social safety nets are insufficient to
meet needs - How should expansion of SP systems be financed?
- Often scope for consolidation of existing,
fragmented programs (Brazil, Jamaica, and
Argentina) - Significant scope from moving from product
subsidies to households transfers/CCTs (Mexico
late 1990s, Indonesia 2004, and Philippines 2008) - Political will to raise revenue and re-prioritize
spending towards safety nets partly affected by
whether safety nets linked to growth strategy
(infrastructure creation/maintenance, human
development)
9Spending on Safety Nets is Modest
Mean 1.7 of GDP median 1.4 of GDP (n72) For
1/2 of countries is about 1-2 of GDP
10Greater flexibility, less dogma
- Subsidies important to distinguish between
universal subsidies which depress incentives and
take up large share of budget vs. smaller
subsidies targeted at vulnerable groups -
- Cash vs. food transfers in principle cash more
efficient and less prone to leakage. However,
food, particularly fortified food, can lead to
nutritional gains, so trade-off with governance
issues ought to be recognized - Yet mindful that actions today dont undermine
medium term safety net goals
11Linking country-level quick diagnostics with
safety net response - Armenia
Poverty Trends and Projections of Extreme
Poverty, 20082010
- Poverty impact from lower growth, unemployment,
lower wages, falling remittances and higher
inflation (devaluation) - Cumulative impact is 7 point increase in
poverty (2007-09) - Estimate to mitigate impact on very poor is 0.4
of GDP (using increase in poverty gap) - Options to mitigate impact include expanding the
Family Benefit program (with improvements in
targeting) and scaling up public works schemes
Poverty Gap due to the Economic Crisis (AMD MM),
2009
12Concluding thoughts
- Impact considerable and in some countries high
food prices adding to economic crisis impact - Rapid assessment of extent of impact and rough
cost (e.g. Armenia) required in each country - Safety net responses will require expenditure
reallocations and likely external resources - Second/third best policies/programs will often be
used though in some cases crisis can be an
opportunity for medium term development of the
sector - Linking safety nets with growth strategy
important for medium term fiscal sustainability