POLS 373 Foundations of Comparative Politics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

POLS 373 Foundations of Comparative Politics

Description:

... have a multiparty system with political parties competing with one another, free ... Based on the premise that political/economic power in non-democratic societies ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: Timot
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: POLS 373 Foundations of Comparative Politics


1
POLS 373 Foundations of Comparative Politics
  • What Makes a Democracy?
  • November 21, 2006

2
What Makes a Democracy?
  • What is democracy?

3
What Makes a Democracy?
  • In the academic literature, democracy is
    generally defined either formally (i.e.,
    narrowly) or substantively (i.e., broadly), or
    sometimes as a combination of the two

4
What Makes a Democracy?
  • The formal definition of democracy is
    straightforward. Here is one definition
  • I would say democracy exists where you have a
    multiparty system with political parties
    competing with one another, free and non-corrupt
    voting procedures to elect political leaders, and
    an effective legal framework of civil liberties
    or human rights that underlie the mechanisms of
    voting processes.

5
What Makes a Democracy?
  • If the foregoing definition down, we have three
    readily discernable components of democracy
  • A competitive multiparty system
  • Free and non-corrupt elections
  • An effective legal framework of civil liberties
    or human rights
  • To this list, we might add a fourth component
  • Universal and equal suffrage (suffrage is simply
    the right or privilege of voting)

6
What Makes a Democracy?
  • Many scholars, though, argue that the formal
    requirements of democracy arent enough

7
What Makes a Democracy?
  • Is an imperfect democracy still a democracy or is
    it something else?
  • To properly answer this question, it is critical
    to contrast democracy with potential
    alternatives authoritarianism, totalitarianism,
    monarchy, and so on
  • You must be able to say that an imperfect
    democracy is not meaningfully different from any
    alternatives--consider the issue in more concrete
    terms

8
What Makes a Democracy?
  • Is it legitimate to say that there is no
    meaningful difference between an imperfect
    democracy, such as exists in the United States
    and many other countries, and, say, Nazi Germany
    or Cambodia under Pol Pot or Uganda under Idi
    Amin?

9
What Makes a Democracy?
  • With the foregoing discussion in mind, we can now
    focus on the next big set of questions, which
    are
  • How and why do democracies emerge?
  • Why do some survive while others do not?
  • Why do some thrive and become stronger over time,
    while others just sort of limp along?

10
What Makes a Democracy?
  • Structural Approaches to the Study of Democracy

11
What Makes a Democracy?
  • Lets begin with a simple, but telling
    observation the people (or the social class)
    that have predominant control over economic
    resources in society are generally not friends of
    democracy
  • Why?

12
What Makes a Democracy?
  • For the dominant groups in society, genuine
    democracy represents a concrete threat to their
    own interests, since, by its very nature,
    democracy gives power to the oppressed
    subordinate classes who constitute the large
    majority of any societys population

13
What Makes a Democracy?
  • Think of it this way If the majority of people
    in a society are poor and exploited would they
    not be immediately tempted, in a democratic
    system, to use their new-found and overwhelming
    voting power to redistribute economic resources
    and, ultimately, to undermine permanentlyif not
    destroythe position and privileges of the
    wealthy (or political and economic elite)?
  • More to the point, would not the elite be well
    aware of this potential threat and, therefore, do
    whatever they could to prevent democracy from
    taking hold?

14
What Makes a Democracy?
  • Given the almost undeniable tension between
    democracy and social inequality, Ruschemeyer et
    al. make a basic assertion, one which undergirds
    their entire argument Democracy is above all a
    matter of power

15
What Makes a Democracy?
  • As a struggle for power, democracy is highly
    conditioned
  • This means that transitions to democracy are
    constrained and enabled by broad structural
    changes that reorder the balance of power among
    different classes and class coalitions in society

16
What Makes a Democracy?
  • Central Contention Capitalist development is
    related to democracy because it shifts the
    balance of class power, because it weakens the
    power of the landlord class and strengthens
    subordinate classes

17
What Makes a Democracy?
  • Key Point For democracy to emerge, subordinate
    classes must have sufficient power to challenge
    the dominant classes.

18
What Makes a Democracy?
  • How is this a structural argument?
  • Because capitalist development inexorably creates
    the foundation for subordinate classes to
    exercise power

19
What Makes a Democracy?
  • How and why does capitalist development shift
    power to subordinate classes?
  • Short Answer Capitalist development generally
    entails the an increasing concentration of
    workers, all of whom toil under the same general
    (and generally exploitative and powerless)
    conditions

20
What Makes a Democracy?
  • Consider a typical urban factory and the
    emergence of factory towns

21
What Makes a Democracy?
  • Class organization is key, for the power of
    workers is maximized only when they can act in
    united manner
  • As long as they are divided, they are weak and
    will remain weak. But a united working class is
    a powerful working class.

22
What Makes a Democracy?
  • While the role of the working class and the
    internal dynamics of capitalism occupy center
    stage in the authors argument, they also
    acknowledged a couple of other important factors
  • The first is the structure of state and
    state-society relations, and the relative power
    balance between the state and social actors
  • The second factor, or power cluster, involves
    international power relations

23
What Makes a Democracy?
  • The structure of state and state-society
    relations, and the relative power balance between
    the state and social actors

24
What Makes a Democracy?
  • International power relations
  • During the cold war, international power
    relations were a key force in blocking
    democratization, since dominant states like the
    United States often directly supported and helped
    strengthen dictatorships, as long as they were
    anti-Communist (while the Soviet Union supported
    anti-American regimes)

25
What Makes a Democracy?
  • International power relations
  • Indeed, in a few cases, the United States
    directly intervened to help bring down
    democratically elected governments in the
    developing world for fear that those governments
    would not support US interests
  • Chile is a good example of this

26
What Makes a Democracy?
  • Important Point
  • Power clusters are inter-related they act
    together to produce or undermine democracy

27
What Makes a Democracy?
  • RATIONAL CHOICE APPROACES

28
Democracy Rational Choice
  • A key difference between structural and rational
    choice approaches might be encapsulated in the
    following statement
  • Waiting for democracy versus making democracy

29
Democracy Rational Choice
  • Two basic approaches in rational choice
  • Elite-centered (top-down)
  • Cooperative approaches
  • Bottom-up (or mass-based movements)
  • Non-cooperative approaches

30
Democracy Rational Choice
  • Elite-centered Approaches
  • Based on the premise that political/economic
    power in non-democratic societies resides
    primarily in the hands of the elite
  • In this view, democracy is always a product of
    essentially voluntary and (of course)
    self-interested decisions made by elite actors

31
Democracy Rational Choice
  • Elite-centered Approaches
  • Elite-based rational choice explanations posit
    that any changes must be a product of disputes
    among the elite themselves
  • Usually result of a cleavage or split between
    hard-liners and soft-liners

32
Democracy Rational Choice
  • Elite-centered Approaches
  • Important QuestionWhere do demands for change
    arise?
  • Usually exogenous source, such as economic or
    political crisis that threatens the legitimacy of
    the ruling elite
  • Outsiders in political system may also play a
    role (putting pressure on elite for political
    change)

33
Democracy Rational Choice
  • Elite-centered Approaches
  • A democratic transition is most likely when
    soft-liners in the regime have relatively equal
    power to hard-liners and
  • Exogenous shock cannot be easily overcome,
    and/or
  • When opposition is moderate, as opposed to radical

34
Democracy Rational Choice
  • Elite-centered Approaches
  • Nature of top-down democratization means that
  • Transitions to democracy are generally the
    product of negotiated pacts or agreements among
    the elite
  • Transitions represent a second best outcome
  • Transitions do not require a commitment to
    democracy on the part of any elite group
  • Democracy without democrats

35
Democracy Rational Choice
  • Bottom-up explanations
  • Based on the premise that democracy is not a
    product of elite negotiations, but of strong
    pressure from the masses or from outsiders
  • Democracy therefore reflects a relative (and
    significant) loss of power among the elite in
    general, rather than just a split between elites

36
Democracy Rational Choice
  • Authoritarian Regime Types and Democratic
    Transition

37
Democracy Rational Choice
  • Authoritarian Regime Types and Democratic
    Transition
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com