Technology and Sustainable Economic Development - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Technology and Sustainable Economic Development

Description:

Ph.D in environmental policy, Harvard, 00. Research interests in policy, science, politics ... ( do a poll here) Intended Participants. All ... ( do a poll here) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:13
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: csBer
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Technology and Sustainable Economic Development


1
Technology and Sustainable Economic Development
  • Nov 15, 2002

2
Outline
  • Introductions
  • Motivation Objectives
  • Format
  • Themes Topics
  • Living laboratory
  • Todays presentation proper

3
Introducing Ourselves
  • Alastair Iles
  • Postdoctoral research fellow at Society
    Environment Energy and Resources Group, UCB
  • Ph.D in environmental policy, Harvard, 00
  • Research interests in policy, science, politics
  • Matthew Kam
  • 2nd-yr Ph.D. student in EECS with primary
    interest in Human-Centered Computing
  • B.A. Economics, B.S. EECS, UCB 01
  • B.A. thesis was his first shot at development
    microeconomics

4
Motivation
  • Have not encountered similar opportunity at UCB
    for cross-disciplinary engagement on this topic
  • Technical design often isolated from social
    factors

5
Motivation
  • But new research suggests
  • Successful use of technology depends on tacit
    work practices developed for specific contexts
  • Decentralized technology may be more effective
    than centralized ones
  • Others?

6
Objectives
  • Dual-track initiative
  • Technology track How do we design technology
    for sustainable development?
  • Social track What are the broader social,
    business and political contexts influencing the
    success of these designs?

7
Objectives
  • Forum for interested UCB students to
  • Get acquainted
  • Keep up with related developments
  • Incubate alternative visions to advance
    sustainable development in both developing and
    developed countries using technology
  • Others? (do a poll here)

8
Intended Participants
  • All interested folks are welcome!
  • Not restricted to Ph.D. students(we also have an
    undergraduate, exchange student, recent UCB
    graduates, and postdoc)
  • Not restricted to EECS, ERG or SIMS(would
    benefit from MBA, public policy, public health,
    other science/engineering and social sciences
    inputs)

9
Tentative Format
  • Weekly 1-hour meetings
  • Format
  • Presentation by volunteer (15 min)
  • Break-out discussions (15 min)
  • Combined discussion (20 min)
  • Format to be reviewed by everyone in last session
    of Fall 02 (Dec 13)

10
Broad Themes
  • Technology
  • Participatory design
  • Decentralized systems
  • Sustainable development
  • Economic, sociopolitical viability
  • Distributive effects of technology deployment
  • To review collectively after Fall 02

11
Specific Topics
  • Rotate among participants areas of interest /
    specialization
  • Topics
  • EECS (albeit with SIMS / HCI / STS flavor)
  • Green technology
  • Economics
  • Others? (do a poll here)
  • Tentative plan Fix topics for each session in
    advance, students (or volunteer presenter) in
    respective areas agree on reading(s)

12
Living Laboratory
  • Intimate, long-term exposure to the design, use
    and evolution of technology promotes deeper
    appreciation and understanding
  • To observe CHSP regulations
  • Findings to be shared (and debated) among
    participants
  • Collectively work towards an interpretation, i.e.
    the lessons learnt

13
Living Laboratory
  • First shot Livenotes
  • Collaborative note-taking application
  • Handheld wireless tablets
  • E.g. of a decentralized, interactive technology
  • Call for volunteers (approx. 3)

14
  • Any questions before we proceed with presentation
    of todays readings?
  • What works?What doesnt?
  • Well collectively review the reading groups
    organization in last session of Fall 02 (Dec
    13)

15
Todays readings
  • Two chapters from the Worldwide Wildlife Fund
    report on IT/sustainability, July 2002
  • - Zambrano intergovernmental funding and
    strategies for promoting technology
  • - Wijkman Afifi what technology can do
    (todays focus)
  • Written by government bureaucrats.
  • Focused on information technology (IT).
  • Just a starting point for discussion...

16
Beginning Caveats...
  • What does technology cover? IT is just one of
    the technologies that could support sustainable
    development technology designed for other
    purposes may be applied to environmental
    purposes.
  • What does sustainable development mean?The
    readings take it for granted that we know what SD
    is.

17
Wijkman Afifi (1)
  • Argues
  • - IT will transform society without physical
    work or materials
  • - IT can help developing countries leapfrog
    over pollution and reduce energy intensity
  • - UNDP Report 2001 shows that IT can help
    promote economic growth
  • - however there is a digital divide that
    exacerbates poverty, unemployment,
    underdevelopment...

18
Wijkman Afifi (2)
  • Argues
  • - the equity of the IT changes depends on human
    capital
  • - Those best placed to identify their tech.
    needs are the different stakeholders themselves.
  • - deliberate policy-making by governments is
    central.
  • - the international community/market has been
    very slow to invest in IT in developing
    countries the UN is disappointing.

19
Wijkman Afifi (3)
  • Examples of IT Uses
  • - farmers using the web or cell phones to check
    going prices for their produce
  • - Village Knowledge Centers (South India)
  • - Grameen Bank Pay Phones (Bangladesh)
  • - Reproductive Health On-line (Uganda)
  • - cyber kiosks run by village entrepreneurs
    (India)

20
Wijkman Afifi (4)
  • Questions
  • - Is information really separate from physical
    work and systems? Isnt human capital needed to
    adapt IT to local social settings?
  • - To what degree are leapfrogging and
    climbing ladders really effective?
  • - Is there an excessive focus on web-based
    approaches, as contrasted to other IT
    technologies? The put-everything-online
    syndrome.

21
Wijkman Afifi (5)
  • More questions
  • - Isnt this approach like e-government and
    not participatory or grassroots?
  • - Where are the communities whose needs are
    supposedly being addressed?
  • - There is no mention of the energy needed to
    support the IT how will this energy be provided?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com