Title: Lessons Learnt from the Australian Defence Materiel Organisation
1Lessons Learnt from the Australian Defence
Materiel Organisation
- Chief Finance Officer (Comptroller)
- Steve Wearn
2Who Are We?
- The DMOs role is to
- To equip and sustain the Australian Defence
Force. - The Australian Defence Force (ADF) relies on us
to provide its equipment on time, on budget and
to the required levels of quality and safety - DMO is involved in many of the largest and most
demanding projects in Australia. - About 46 per cent of total Australian 2009-10
Defence budget - 1 per cent of Australian GDP
- Capital Acquisition program of 6.3 billion in
2009-10 - More than 5.4 billion on sustainment
(through-life support) - Over 210 current major projects
- Over 150 minor projects
- Over 8,000 employees
- Over 40 locations throughout Australia and
overseas
3Timeline
- 2000-01 Australian Government introduces Accrual
Reporting for each Agency. - 2003-04 Australian Government introduces Accrual
Budgeting for each Agency. - 2004-05 Defence self qualifies its own accounts
and receives significant Audit qualification
on its Accounts. - 2004-05 Defence embarks on Remediation Plan.
- 2005-06 DMO separates from Defence as a
Prescribed Agency. - 2005-06 Defence Accounts qualified, DMOs
Accounts unqualified. - 2006-07 Defence Accounts qualified, DMOs
Accounts unqualified. - 2007-08 Defence and DMO Accounts unqualified
4Adoption of Accrual Budgeting and Reporting
- Australia is one of only a few countries that
have adopted full accrual budgeting and
reporting. - Introduced reporting in 2000-01and budgeting in
2003-04 - A real challenge for Defence/DMO
- Some of challenges
- Not fully funded for depreciation
- Many of our records where still paper based or
lost over time - What value do we place on assets and inventory?
- Areas still thought they were managing cash
- Very costly to implement
- Move to Australian Equivalent to International
Financial Reporting Standards
5So what did Defence/DMO do?
- Although unqualified in the first few years it
wasnt until Defence really started to examine
the details that it was apparent that it did not
meet accounting standards and as such was at risk
of being qualified by the ANAO (the Australian
GAO equivalent), so it self qualified. - Embarked on a Project to draw together all
components necessary for a best practice accrual
financial management environment. - The cornerstone of the project was a number of
targeted remediation strategies. 31 in total.
6Financial Controls Framework
- Develop and embed a comprehensive Defence
Financial Controls Framework that includes - Establishing the elements of the financial
controls framework - Assigning responsibility to Group Heads to
implement the financial controls framework - Implementing standardised processes and
practices and - Establishing business skilling and competency
assessment.
7Improving the Australian National Audit Office
Annual Audit Process
- Establish an accountable officer to manage audit
activities between Defence and the Australian
National Audit Office. Key tasks include - Negotiating an engagement plan
- Agreeing to a consistent approach for
terminology, quality and format of responses and - Establishing comprehensive procedures for quality
assurance and clearing audit findings.
8Financial Management and Systems Training
Financial and Business Management
- Develop, conduct and deliver business capability
workshops to improve officers underpinning
knowledge and skills - Accrual accounting
- Diploma of Government (Financial Management)
- Graduate Certificate in Professional Management
(Finance) and - Financial management for Senior Executive Service
(1 Star and above) and Executive Level 2 (Col
equivalent) officers and ADF equivalents.
9Stores Record Accuracy
- Remediate the general stores inventory and
repairable items qualification by - Conducting 100 per cent stock takes at our
Warehouses - Correcting errors in stores record quantities in
logistics management systems and - Promulgating and ensuring compliance with
stocktaking policy to improve stocktaking
practices and reporting.
10General Stores Inventory Pricing and Accounting
- Remediate the general stores inventory pricing
and accounting qualification by - Developing a statistical model to validate legacy
(pre-1997) priced items - Implementing an exception reporting regime to
provide quality assurance - Establishing policies and procedures for
inventory pricing controls on the Standard
Defence Supply System and - Establishing policy to ensure the correct
treatment of general stores inventory.
11Supply Customer Accounts
- Remediate the supply customer account element of
the repairable item quantities qualification by - Allocating all supply customer accounts an
accountable owner - Ensuring all supply customer account balances on
the Standard Defence Supply System are correct
and - Improving business processes and controls for
supply customer accounts.
These include improvements to data creation,
maintenance and reporting to ensure accurate
quantity, ownership and location details are
entered and maintained for all supply customer
accounts on the Standard Defence Supply System.
12Explosive Ordnance
- Remediate the Explosive Ordnance inventory
pricing qualification by - Sourcing (where possible) original documentation
to substantiate Explosive Ordnance inventory
prices - Developing tools to substantiate Explosive
Ordnance inventory values when appropriate
supporting documentation cannot be located to
support prices and - Improving and integrating Explosive Ordnance
inventory accounting and systems management
processes. These changes are designed to confirm
the accuracy of asset values and enable adherence
of financial management standards.
13Leave Records
- Remediate the leave provisions qualification by
- Implementing a risk stratification and sampling
methodology to quantify the risk to Defence
accounts - Providing an accurate representation of the leave
liability by ensuring the integrity of leave data
captured and recorded in the Defence Personnel
system and - Applying quality assurance to business processes,
record keeping strategies, reporting structures,
relevant policy foundations, training initiatives
and a controls framework.
14Executive Remuneration
- Remediate the Executive Remuneration Note
qualification by - Completing the Senior Executive Service and
military equivalents leave audit and - Implementing a new system for reporting Executive
Remuneration that includes applying quality
assurance to business processes, record keeping
strategies, reporting structures, relevant policy
foundations and training incentives, and a
controls framework.
15Property Valuations
- Remediate the land, buildings and infrastructure
and other plant and equipment qualification by - Revising the Australian Valuation Office
engagement letter to clarify valuation policy,
procedures and outcomes - Contracting the Australian Valuation Office to
revalue all land, buildings and infrastructure
and other plant and equipment assets to fair
value in accordance with policy guidance - Undertaking quality assurance on Australian
Valuation Office site reports to ensure
completeness - Entering revaluation data into the financial
system (ROMAN) and completing revised
depreciation calculations - Engaging a valuation contractor for the next
three - year cycle and
- Fully documenting the revaluation process in
- Corporate Services Asset Management and
- Accounting Manual.
16Preventing the Escalation of Category A and B
Findings
- Prevent the escalation of Category A and B
findings by - Assigning responsibility across Defence for
remediation of each of the 57 audit findings not
already allocated to a remediation plan - Establishing a project-based management system
for tracking and managing resolution of these
Australian National Audit Office findings - Undertaking progressive and final quality
assurance of the remediation outcomes and - Reporting to the Financial Statements Project
Board and Defence Audit Committee on detailed
progress.
17Stock Holding Controls
- Improve stock holding controls by
- Preventing or reducing the instance of items
first found and write-offs and - Accounting for and monitoring those instances
first found and write-offs considered legitimate
or expected. - The remediation activities focussed on preventing
errant transactions on the Standard Defence
Supply System through improvements in policy,
procedure and system process, and the
introduction of investigative reporting to
measure compliance.
18Standard Defence Supply System Items
Not-in-Catalogue
- The activities included
- Clarifying and simplifying policy directives to
better support effective item identification,
purchasing and management process. - Make Logistics Managers accountable
- Developing a self remediation methodology to
transition Not- In-Catalogue items into the
Standard Defence Supply System and the standard
financial management regime, including
development of a value proposition for the
management of legacy items and - Developing a compliance monitoring and reporting
framework to assist with adherence to new policy
and process
19Provisions for Contaminated or Potentially
Contaminated Land, Buildings and Infrastructure
- Remediate the provision for land decontamination
qualification by - Ensuring accounting policies reflect current
reporting requirements - Ensuring that sufficient and appropriate
policies, procedures and practices are formalised
and implemented for the identification of
contaminated land , valuation of required
documentation and review of procedures undertaken
and assessments made and - Obtaining a clear understanding from the
Australian Valuation Office regarding matters
included in valuation assessments.
20Commitments and Accounting for Leases
- Remediate the audit finding issued for
Commitments and Accounting for Leases carried
forward by defining the criteria for recording
commitments and - Establishing a lease register that identifies
cashflows, revenues, expenses, liabilities,
receivables and commitments.
21Just to add some spice!
- Issues arising as being part of Defence
- Kinnard Review
- continuing delays in the delivery of major
defence equipment - clear aim for DMO to continue to become more
outcome-focused and business-like in its
operations - Greater Accountability and Responsibility
- Increased Flexibility and Performance
- Greater Autonomy
- 3 Options Do nothing Prescribed Agency
Executive Agency - Prescribed Agency helped to avoid duplication and
extra costs. - Government decided to establish the DMO as a
separate agency
22Business Model
- DMO delivers services to the Government and
Defence through the provision of services across
three key areas - 1. Planning and Advising
- 2. Capital Acquisition to Support Defence
- 3. Sustainment of Defence equipment
- Defence is DMOs primary customer and has
responsibility for setting requirements and
priorities for the services to be delivered by
DMO to meet the Governments capability
commitments. - CEO has defined financial responsibilities
directly to Government. - Must present own Budgets and Financial Statements
- However decisively linked to Defence due to
funding nature of Purchaser-Provider
relationship. - Defence pays DMO for all acquisition and
sustainment costs along with the associated
operating costs.
23Achieving Prescription
- One of the biggest demergers in corporate
Australia - Main process of demerging with Defence was the
development of the Business Model. - DMO brought across very few assets, financial
reporting aspect relatively painless, however - Separation of DMO within Defences Financial
Management Systems took place over the preceding
18 months. - Establishment of Special Account with the
Government also had to be developed - Established opening DMO Balance Sheet
- Negotiate with Defence and ANAO as to where AUC,
SME and Inventory/EO would sit - DMO or Defence.
Had to conform and be tested against Australian
Accounting Standards. - All assets and inventory holdings transferred
across had to be valued - Still an issue for
Defence today - DMO specific Chief Executive Instructions,
delegations and Accounting Policies had to be
developed - Accounting policy had to be aligned with the
DMO-Defence Business Model - DMO officially separated on 1 July 2005
24Current Defence / DMO Financial Arrangements
(until 30 June 09)
Government
Policy and Advice and associated operating costs
Funds for Capital Projects and Sustainment and
associated operating costs
DMO
Defence
Payment for Capital and Sustainment and Op costs
25How Did We Perform?
- DMO financial statements have never been
qualified since 2005. - Many of the initial DMO audit findings were
carried across from Defence. - About 1/3 of current DMO audit findings relate to
Defence financial statements, but are allocated
to us due to DMO staff being involved in the
preparation of that aspect of Defence's financial
statements. - Remaining audit findings are generally in regard
to DMO's controls framework. On rectification of
audit issue, new audit findings are generally
found in respect to different aspect of controls
framework. - Different interpretations of the DMO business
model by ANAO and DMO often result in audit
findings. Both interpretations are correct but a
difference of opinion results. - Audit findings in relation to the financial
systems are duplicated across both Defence and
DMO financial statements.
26Reform Since Prescription
- Since prescription, DMO has focused on optimising
DMOs effectiveness and making the organisation
more business like, accountable and outcome
driven. - Deloittes Review
- Performance is being hindered by the need for
significant effort by staff to perform ongoing
reconciliations and validation of historical
information. - This effort is a result of a lack of accurate
end-to-end processes and IT systems which
inadequately support the business processes. - The lack of integration and alignment of
corporate IT systems with business processes has
resulted in the proliferation of work around
activity and standalone IT solutions. - Mortimer Review
27Defence / DMO Financial Arrangements (Post 1 July
2009)
Government
Policy and Advice and associated operating costs
Funds for Capital Projects and Sustainment
Operating Costs for Capital and Sustainment
DMO
Defence
Payment for Capital and Sustainment
28Achievements to Date
- Financial processes, management and policies are
largely satisfactory, but possibly requiring
slight refinement. - Most issues/problems in DMO can be traced back to
deficiencies in the systems which it uses. DMO
has no Chief Information Officer and relies on
Defence for IT support.
29What we would do differently
- In hindsight, it would have been better to have a
more in-depth understanding of how the cash
balances which were transferred across were made
up, and what each dollar was allocated to. - On prescription, very little documentation
exists, instead details are embedded in various
staff members knowledge. - Too many systems!!
- Place a greater emphasis on record keeping.
- Argue the case to not include Specialist Military
Equipment - Maybe an Executive Agency instead of Prescribed
30Where to from here
- Operation Sunlight Government has decided to
move to funding Agencies on a Net Cost of
Services basis. Still report on an accrual basis.
31Questions