CDI Campus Trends: What are the data telling us

1
CDI Campus TrendsWhat are the data telling us?

• Jose F. Moreno Mari Luna De La Rosa
• CDI Evaluation Seminar
• June 8, 2004
• Pomona, CA

2
Data Elements

• Enrollments (N 18 Campuses)
• Retention Graduation Rates (N 19 Campuses)
• Faculty Demographics (N 19 21 Campuses)

3
California HS Graduates by Race/Ethnicity
Selected Indicators, 2001
Source California Department of Education,
Educational Demographics Unit, DataQuest
4
CDI Full Time Undergraduates by Race/Ethnicity
Year, ()N 18 Campuses
5
CDI Frosh by Race/Ethnicity Year, () N 18
Campuses
6
CDI Pell Grants by Race/Ethnicity, 2000 - 2003
() N 18 Campuses
7
CDI Pell Grants within Race/Ethnicity, 2000 -
2003 () N 18 Campuses
8
CDI Average Persistence Rates by Race/Ethnicity,
1994 - 2002 () N 19 Campuses
100
91
87
87
90
86
86
84
82
82
79
78
78
77
77
80
76
75
72
70
69
70
All Students
60
American Indian
African American
50
Latino/a
Asian American/PI
40
White
30
20
10
0
2nd Year
3rd Year
4th Year
9
Average 1-Year Persistence Rates by
Race/Ethnicity () N 19 Campuses
100
92
91
88
88
87
87
87
87
90
86
86
86
85
84
84
84
84
84
80
76
70
All Students
60
American Indian
African American
50
Latino/a
Asian American/PI
40
White
30
20
10
0
Pre CDI (1994-1996)
Pre CDI (1997-1999)
CDI (2000-02)
10
Average 2-Year Persistence Rates by
Race/Ethnicity () N 19 Campuses
100
87
90
85
81
79
79
78
78
78
78
78
77
77
80
77
71
71
71
69
68
70
All Students
60
American Indian
African American
50
Latino/a
Asian American/PI
40
White
30
20
10
0
Pre CDI (1994-1996)
Pre CDI (1997-1999)
CDI (2000-02)
11
CDI Average 4-Year 6-Year Graduation Rates by
Race/Ethnicity, 1994 2002 () N 19 Campuses
100
90
80
74
71
70
67
65
65
64
63
62
59
All Students
57
60
American Indian
51
49
African American
50
Latino/a
Asian American/PI
40
White
30
20
10
0
4-Year Graduation Rate
6-Year Graduation Rate
12
CDI Full Time Faculty by Race/Ethnicity Year,
1995 2003 () (Tenured Tenure Track) N 19
Campuses
13
CDI New Tenure Track Faculty by Race/Ethnicity,
2000 - 2003 () N 21 Campuses
14
CDI New Tenured Faculty by Race/Ethnicity, 2000 -
2003 () N 21 Campuses
15
CDI New Tenured Tenure Track Faculty Hires by
Race/Ethnicity, 2000 2003 ()N 21 Campuses
16
CDI New Tenured Tenure Track Faculty Hires by
Race/Ethnicity, 2000 2003 (Actual Ns) N 21
Campuses
17
Preliminary Trends Observed

• Enrollments
• URM proportional enrollments have remained
  relatively stagnant
• Slight increase in URM Frosh since 2000
• Overall decrease in of students on Pell Grants
  since 2000
• of URM API students who are Pell are
  steadily declining with slight decrease in Whites
• Persistence Graduation Rates
• Attrition for all groups across years with little
  difference among URM and White Attrition rates
  (with exception of American Indian students)
• Improved 1st 2nd year retention rates (on
  average) for URM students except American Indian
  students in the 2nd year during CDI years
• Differential graduation rates at both 4 6 year
  grad rates by race/ethnicity
• Faculty
• Little change in proportion of URM Tenured
  Tenure Track Faculty
• Proportion of URM New faculty hires reflects
  existing demographics