Pedagocical Scenario development

1
Pedagocical Scenariodevelopment

• Università della Svizzera Italiana
• Module Water
• Introductory of Basic Concepts

2
Initial Brick

• 5 Theoretical chapters
• 5 quizes (self valutation)
• The learner had to
• Read the textbook
• Self evaluation and assess the knowledge

3
Meeting with IntersTICE

• Prof. J. Viens, B. Class, etc Psychopedagogical
  Assistance
• 4 rules of internet
• Research/Access to information
• Communication
• Teaching
• Reflexion

4
Two points of reflexion

• The learner should never feel alone
• Internet as a tool can bring
• A knowledge
• A know-how
• ? The know-how can be an associated skill, and
  can increase the competence (comptetitive
  knowledge or comparative knowledge).

5
Problems to solve

• Time (professor, tutor, developpers)
• Experience (idem)
• Learner motivation
• Technical requirement

6
A possible solution

• Socio-constructivist scenario
• Team work (learner is no more alone)
• Time in front of the computer re-invested in team
  work
• Reading of the chapter as homework.

7
Our pedagogical scenario

• Several activities, which are all described (the
  learner have to do something.)
• Everything that the learner does is re-used for
  his studies.
• 3 principal activities in our scenario
• Reading of the theoritical chapters,
• Development of a problem,
• Comment on problems.

8
Details of activity 1

• Reading the chapters
• Homework
• Question in a specific forum
• Log-book
• Knowlegde assimilation
• Knowlegde of assimilation
• Preparation for the final exam

9
Details of activity 2

• Solve a problem in team work
• Cooperative work
• A question must be solved and discussed in small
  team and a general answer is presented to the
  whole group
• ?the knowledge is re-used
• ?the debate is induced

10
Details of activity 3

• Comment on cooperative document from the other
  groupes
• There is no right or wrong asnwer, there are only
  different arguments.
• Responsibility when the group shows his work to
  other groups.
• Entire (global) reflexion on the theme.

11
Developping process
Scenario timing, details, etc..
Ressources technical, people, etc..
Guidelines everything must be explicite for the
learner,the tutor and the professor
12
Needs in guidelines

• Scenario
• Evaluation in guideline for every activity, and
  for every action.
• For the learner
• For the tutor
• For the professor who wants to re-use the brick.

13
First version
14
Conclusion

• At level of content
• No changing except the general question and the
  ressources (bibliography)
• At tecnhical level
• ? Optimal use of the potential of OiL (leaning
  managment system)

15
Conclusion

• Human ressources
• One tutor needed (not more than one professor who
  gives his classical course)
• Pedagogy
• ? Important work in terms of time and organisation

16
Conclusion

• Investment in terms of working hours
• For the learner personnal work , but final
  exam time preparation is included, conneted time
  is the same,
• For the professor content is the same,
• less work during the sessions
• For the tutor , but with experience!
• Pedagogical scenario but the scenario can be
  reused as well!!!