Grants Policy Committee - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Grants Policy Committee

Description:

Transparency Act Grants Sub-Award Pilot update ... Andrea Brandon (USDA), Transparency Act, Grants Committee, Sub-Award Pilot Group ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: char47
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Grants Policy Committee


1
  • Grants Policy Committee
  • Stakeholders Webcast
  • March 18, 2008

Tom Cooley GPC Chair
2
Agenda
  • Welcome and thank you to HUD
  • Strategic planning and product update
  • Transparency Act Grants Sub-Award Pilot update
  • Post-Award Work Group/Performance Progress Report
    update
  • Question Answer panel

3
Presenters
  • Tom Cooley (NSF), Grants Policy Committee (GPC)
    Chair
  • Andrea Brandon (USDA), Transparency Act, Grants
    Committee, Sub-Award Pilot Group Chair
  • Michael Nelson (DOC), GPC, Post-Award Work Group
    Chair
  • Diana King (HHS), GPC, Performance Progress
    Report Team Leader
  • Elizabeth Phillips, Contractor for HHS/ACF

4
The Grants Policy Committee
  • The GPC is a committee of the U.S. Chief
    Financial Officers (CFO) Council.
  • The GPC is charged with improving the management
    of Federal financial assistance government-wide.
  • The Committee recommends financial assistance
    policies and practices to OMB and coordinates
    related interagency activities.
  • The GPC serves the public interest in
    collaboration with other Federal-wide grants
    initiatives.

5
Draft Strategic Plan Overview
  • Vision Mission
  • Twin Strategic Goals
  • Streamlining and Stewardship
  • Objectives
  • Consolidated and consistent OMB
    guidance
  • Uniform forms and formats
  • Standard business processes
  • GPC organizational performance
  • Community involvement
  • Training and certification
  • Audit and oversight

6
Proposed Priorities
  • Near-term (FY08)
  • Products currently in the Federal Register
    Process
  • Federal Register Process

7
Near-term Priorities
  • Additional near-term activities include
  • Audit-related policies and processes
  • Stakeholder education and outreach

8
Proposed Priorities
  • Mid-term (1-3 years) and long-term (4-5 years)
  • Consolidated and consistent OMB guidance on
    grants policy
  • Continued stakeholder education and outreach
  • Further development of audit processes
  • Development of training and certification
    standardization for Federal Grants Professionals

9
Mid-term Priorities
  • Mid-term Products (1-3 years)
  • Subchapter C1, standard award content and format
  • A-133 Report
  • A-133 process review
  • Policy on use of Grants.gov for mandatory grants
  • Training competencies

10
Long-term Priorities
  • Long-term Products (4-5 years)
  • 2 CFR
  • Subchapter A, General Matters
  • Subchapter B, Pre-award Responsibilities
  • Subchapter C, Trafficking in Persons
  • Subchapter C, Expedited Action on FFATA Flow Down
  • Subchapter G, Lobbying Guidance
  • Subchapter G, Drug Free Workforce Policy
  • Cost Principles
  • Announcement format phase 2, late application
    policy
  • Training curriculum
  • Grants Profession document
  • Certificate program
  • Government-wide database tracking training

11
Grants Policy Committee Priorities
  • Any Questions?
  • Call 202-708-0995
  • or
  • Email HUDTV_at_HUD.GOV

12
  • Transparency Act, Grant
  • Sub-Award Pilot Update
  • Andrea Brandon, USDA

13
Transparency Act Grant Sub-Award Pilot
  • Pilot currently set for June 23, 2008 through
    August 23, 2008
  • Open to States, Local Governments, Universities,
    Tribes, Non-Profits, etc.
  • Currently have 53 pilot participants (not
    counting duplicate representatives from the same
    organization)
  • 10 Government 18 Non-profits 25 Colleges
    Universities. 0 Tribal Entities

14
Transparency Act Grant Sub-Award Pilot
  • FFATA Sub-Award Work Group will be working on
    DRAFT Regulations (will publish for 30 day
    comment period by the end of May 2008)
  • 30 day reporting requirement
  • Additional data elements
  • How to report to the Sub-Award database
  • Liability for data (First Tier vs. Sub-Awardee)
  • How many tiers down to report
  • Format for data elements
  • Whether to include deobligation data or not
  • Thresholds

15
Transparency Act Grant Sub-Award Pilot
  • GPC Pre-Award Work Group is finalizing the DRAFT
    regulations on the use of the DUNS number and
    CCR.gov for grant Sub-Awards and the Term and
    Condition to be used on all awards.
  • DRAFT regulations will be sent to GPC and OMB
    simultaneously to be published for 30 day
    comment period by the end of March 2008.

16
Transparency Act Grant Sub-Award Pilot
  • The OMB E-Government office will soon look at
    possible IT Solutions for the grant Sub-Award
    pilot.
  • Possible identification of IT solution before mid
    April 2008.
  • Once IT solution is identified will work with
    pilot participants to finalize the instructions
    for how the pilot will take place.

17
Transparency Act Grant Sub-Award Pilot
  • Would like more pilot participants especially
    from the Tribal Community
  • Would like to make sure that we can test multiple
    levels of Sub-Award reporting from the same grant
    in several instances during the pilot

18
Transparency Act Grant Sub-Award Pilot
  • Any Questions?

19
  • Post Award Work Group
  • SF-PPR
  • Michael Nelson, DOC
  • Post-Award Work Group Chair
  • Diana King, HHS
  • Performance Progress Report
  • Team Leader
  • (by phone)

20
Post-Award Work Group Current Activities
  • Payments
  • Request GPC approval of standard back office and
    user data elements
  • Invention Report
  • Request GPC approval of Federal Register Notice
    (FRN) finalizing data elements

21
Grantee Performance and Progress Reporting
  • Background
  • P.L.106-107 required streamlining forms
  • Initial analysis revealed 800 performance
    reporting forms
  • Post Award Work Group developed a standard SF-PPR
    from 2004 2006
  • GPC approved the SF-PPR in Spring 2006

22
Grantee Performance and Progress Reporting
  • OMB approved use of SF-PPR
  • Grants Center of Excellence (COE) sponsor
  • Published for initial comment April 5, 2007
    72 FR16796
  • Published for final comment July 24, 2007
    72 FR 40307
  • Received OMB approval on November 30, 2007
  • COE electronic proof-of-concept has begun
  • Use of SF-PPR is encouraged by OMB, however no
    policy issuance as yet

23
Performance Progress Report
24
Grantee Performance and Progress Reporting
  • SF-PPR Formats
  • Cover page supplemental information
  • SF-PPR-A, Performance Measures
  • SF-PPR-B, Program Indicators
  • SF-PPR-C, Benchmark Evaluations
  • SF-PPR-D, Table of Activity Results
  • SF-PPR-E, Activity-Based Expenditures
  • SF-PPR-F, Program/Project Management

25
  • SF-PPR Technical Implementation
  • Elizabeth Phillips
  • Synectics for Management Decisions, Inc.
  • Under contract with the Grants Center of
    Excellence (COE), managed by HHS Administration
    for Children and Families (ACF)

26
SF-PPR Technical Implementation
  • Example use of SF-PPR for Protection and Advocacy
    (PA)
  • PA pilot since Fall 2003
  • 8 PA programs across 5 agencies within 3 Federal
    Departments (HHS, Ed., SSA)
  • 8 unique forms to be completed by the same PA
    grantee
  • Collaboration has resulted in agreement on a
    single data collection
  • PA team agrees to use SF-PPR formats

27
SF-PPR Technical Implementation
  • Other examples of SF-PPR use
  • ACFs Abstinence Education program
  • Administration on Native Americans
  • NSF promoting use of SF-RPPR, standard form for
    Research Performance Progress Report
  • Education evaluating use of SF-PPR to replace
    ED-524 currently in use

28
SF-PPR Technical Implementation
  • In the future
  • Center of Excellence (COE) will complete
    electronic prototypes
  • Protection Advocacy reporting
  • Abstinence Education reporting
  • COE partners may opt to use SF-PPR

29
Next Steps
  • The SF-PPR leads the way for other standard
    forms designed to streamline the post-award
    reporting process
  • Standard and simplified forms allow grantees to
    spend more time on grant supported activities

30
Post-Award Work Group Forms Update
  • Public comments are being reviewed and resolved
    on the following forms
  • Research Performance Progress Report
  • Tangible Personal Property Report
  • Real Property Status Report
  • Federal Financial Report

31
Question Answer Session
  • Tom Cooley (NSF), Grants Policy Committee (GPC)
    Chair
  • Andrea Brandon (USDA), Transparency Act, Grants
    Committee, Sub-Award Pilot Group Chair
  • Michael Nelson (DOC), GPC, Post-Award Work Group
    Chair
  • Diana King (HHS), GPC, Performance Progress
    Report Team Leader
  • Elizabeth Phillips, Contractor for HHS/ACF

32
  • Thank you for joining us!
  • To view todays webcast, PowerPoint presentation,
    and to submit feedback go to
  • http//www.grants.gov/aboutgrants/grants_news.jsp
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com