Title: Increasing transparency:
1- Increasing transparency
- Lessons from the Extractive Industries
- MeTA discussion meeting - 13th March 2007
- Vanessa Herringshaw
- Director, London office, Revenue Watch Institute
(RWI)
2Content of presentation
- EITI
- - key elements
- - benefits to date transferable examples
- Practical lessons from implementation
- Strategic issues to consider
3Extractives Industry Transparency Initiative
(EITI)
- Focus massive revenues paid by extractive
companies to host governments - i.e. transparency gt accountability gt improved use
gt combat the resource curse - Key elements transferable to other sectors
- EITI Source book lays out criteria/processes
that are vital - Audit of company finances independent
verifiers, to international standards - Reconciliation - compare statements of
companies with governments - Publishing - in public domain
- All companies covered includes SOEs and
private companies - Civil society - involved at every stage is a
requirements - Workplan - required to show timeframe and
financing - Validation adherence judged by external
evaluator - Leadership and support multi-party,
multi-level, but government-dependent - Multi-sectoral reps in each country, on
International Board International - Need strong secretariat adequate staff
diplomatic/political linkages
4How can greater transparency effect positive
change?
- General positives EITI process builds
- norms of civil society participation in
government decision-making - constructive dialogue between civil society,
companies government - improved capacity of government, civil society
and governments
__________________________________________
5How can greater transparency effect positive
change?
- Specific positives 1) Within EITI minimum
- Identify missing money at aggregated level
- e.g. Cameroon discrepancies revealed between
total declared company payments and total
government receipts. Little use alone but
prerequisite/source of pressure to push for - - Improved government financial management -
specific inquiries / general systems - Appropriate company payments to government
- e.g. Ghana highlighted non-payment of capital
gains tax now paid by Newmont - Raise awareness of total government revenues
- e.g Azerbaijan not so useful alone but
prerequisite/source of pressure to push for - Government to use its revenues well
- - Companies and governments to make deals that
in the public interest - MeTA
- Q - Focus on payments and receipts? From
governments? From companies? - Q - Only really useful linked to other elements?
6How can greater transparency effect positive
change?
- Specific positives 2) Within EITI plus
augmentations in different countries - Identify and publish specific missing money
- By disaggregating individual company information
- By comparing payments to activities production,
sales etc physical audit - e.g. Nigeria physical audits determined oil
production and sales and compared this to
payments transferred. Identified losses/stealing.
Officials (admirals) sacked. - Make the bidding process transparent
- e.g Nigeria now bids and debates open to public
scrutiny - Tracking budget allocation, flow and use down
to sub-district level - e.g. Ghana templates for tracking use of
revenues down to sub-national level - MeTA
- Q - should physical audits (e.g. of drugs
produced and sold) be a focus?
7How can greater transparency effect positive
change?
- Specific positives 3) Beyond EITI using the
stimulus to push beyond - Contracts transparency
- Should all public-private agreements should be
published? - e.g. still looking!
- Policies for sector development public-private
mix, priorities for development - Is the government getting the right bang for its
buck or resource? - e.g. Indonesia likely privatisation of state
oil company - Corporate regulation accounting rules, local
content rules etc - Are companies transparency and contributing to
local societies? - e.g. Nigeria accounting rules that determine
what a company must publicly report - e.g. International Accounting Standards Board
seeking country-by-country reporting - Access to information/ Freedom of information
8What are the practical lessons from EITI?
- Civil society must be a central pillar, built
in and protected - Why?
- Transparency -gt Accountability but to whom?
Citizens - Sustainability after the wave has passed
need local pressure - How?
- Must be there right from before the start
- performance indicator for leaders, not an
afterthought - Must be there at every stage two wheels of a
cart - takes preparation and investment
- Must be real, self-selected civil society
- not industry associations or government
selected - Must be protected when its working, its
dangerous - - civil society reaction force funds,
legal expertise etc - - international expressions of support and
sanction
9What are the practical lessons from EITI?
- 2. Leaders must be selected and supported
- Why?
- Totally pivotal at all levels and all sectors
- Importance of individuals vs institutions
- How? push for the following
- Select from each sector
- Governments EITI best where individual has real
clout, ability and time - International secretariat need dedicated
resources political connections - Companies look for internal leaders, recent
retirees - Investors vital to identify champions
- Civil society invest in key individuals to
drive coalitions - Sustained focus and nurturing
10What are the practical lessons from EITI?
- 3. Credibility must be protected quality
control - Why?
- Need to avoid free-riders
- Need to keep it attractive to members
- How?
- Clear criteria for membership
- Clear process for removal
- Board/mechanism with political will to remove
non-performers - Other sanctions??? Compared to Kimberly Process,
weak at present
11What are the practical lessons from EITI?
- 4. Keep the focus on the necessary information
- Why?
- Pressure from government and companies will be to
reduce it - How?
- Resist aggregation lumping together of
information - Include information necessary to verify accuracy
and appropriateness? - Even once the limits are set at international
level, continue to push for additions that adapt
to local needs
12Strategic issues Keeping the focus
- 1. On what will really bring about change
- Transparency is only a tool, a step
- - Not the final destination
- - Should not be a distraction e.g. not using
what is already available - Institutional solutions Cause or effect?
- - Does not replace the need for deeper
political-economic change
13Strategic issues Keeping the focus
- 2. On companies and home governments not just
poor corrupt governments - Practically no government wants to be a member
of a club for the bad - - Southern governments and partners resent the
double standards -
- Strategically mandatory company requirements
have the potential for international impact - - who is really driving bad practice?
- for every briber taker, there is a briber
payer - - mandatory requirements on MNCs
- e.g International Accounting Standards Board
current opportunity - or build new international requirement through
MeTA -
14Summary Learning from EITI
- EITI
- Key elements
- - Multi-party, multi-level, but
government-dependent - - EITI Source book lays out criteria/processes
that are key - Benefits and Foci for transparency that might be
useful - - Generally - Building new norms of
transparency and dialogue - - EITI minimum starting point aggregated
payments and receipts - - EITI plus pushing for extras bidding
processes, budget tracking - - Beyond EITI contracts, sector policies,
corporate regulation, ATI - 2. Practical Lessons for initiatives
- - Civil society must be a central pillar,
built in and protected - - Leaders must be selected and supported
- - Credibility must be protected quality
control - 3. Strategic issues - keep the focus on