Mixed Dynamic Form Factors in Real Space' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 68
About This Presentation
Title:

Mixed Dynamic Form Factors in Real Space'

Description:

Good approximations for high energy (x-ray energy region) probes. More Absorption. Pictures ... Currently have many pretty pictures but not yet ready to compare ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 69
Provided by: fraangeli
Category:
Tags: dynamic | factors | form | mixed | real | space

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mixed Dynamic Form Factors in Real Space'


1
(No Transcript)
2
Mixed Dynamic Form Factorsand Stopping Powers
  • Adam Sorini

3
Outline
  • Introduction Pictures, Experiments, and Theory
  • Absorption and Scattering
  • Meat Mixed Dynamic Form Factor
  • Stopping Power
  • Results
  • Conclusions / Future Goals

4
Scattering
Scattered probe particle
observer
Incident probe particle
Condensed matter sample
5
X-ray Scattering Apparatus
Scattered X-rays
observer
Incident x-rays
sample
6
Electron Scattering Apparatus
Video games
Incident electron
Sample
Scattered electron
Sample information is same regardless of probe
7
Absorption
Transmitted x-ray beam
Incident x-ray beam
Sample (careful, its hot)
8
Example Absorption Spectrum Cu
K edge
9
Example Absorption Spectrum Cu(zoomed in on K
Edge)
K Edge
EXAFS wiggles
10
Example Condensed Matter System Sodium Metal
So, how do we describe a sample such as this?
11
We use a Greens functions
  • Feffs Greens Function
  • Sample described as collection of potentials
    centered at each lattice point

12
Many body effects
  • Must incorporate loss for photoelectrons
  • Self-Energy
  • Works well for deep core absorption

Screened Coulomb potential
13
Spherical Potentials
Currently a necessary approximation for real
systems
14
Muffin Tin Potentials
interstitial level
15
Key Approximations
  • Ion Cores condensed into a lattice and create
    periodic potential
  • Electrons roughly independent particles
  • Muffin tins replace unit cells
  • Spherical symmetry within tins
  • Good approximations for high energy (x-ray energy
    region) probes

16
More AbsorptionPictures
17
Multiple Scattering Greens Function
  • Exploits spherical symmetry about sites
  • Exploits flatness of interstitial region
  • Physically motivated. Can be calculated (FEFF)

18
Uses for FEFFs Greens function
Use it to sum over states in your golden rule
based calculations of
19
Uses for FEFFs Greens function
1. X-ray absorption
Incoming photon polarization
A core state
20
Approximations seem to work!
21
Uses for FEFFs Greens function
2. Electron scattering my current interest
Double differential cross section
Dynamic form factor
Momentum transfer
Energy loss
22
(No Transcript)
23
Uses for FEFFs Greens function
3. Coherent electron scattering
Mixed Dynamic Form Factor
24
MDFF Experimental Motivation
  • Application which Delights in MDFF Scattering
    perpendicular q and q Schattschneider et al.,
    Nature 441, 486 (2006) mimics dichroism signal
    of x-ray absorption.
  • Application which Abhors yet needs MDFF Electron
    diffraction of Bloch waves in microscopy.

25
MDFF GeCl4(dipole approximation good)
26
MDFF Copper
Full MDFF
P-Projected MDFF
27
MDFF Nickel
28
Application to Stopping PowersMicroscopic
perspective
  • The double differential cross section for
    electron scattering can be written in terms of
    the dynamic form factor.
  • Mean free path is simply related to the total
    cross section
  • Stopping power is the energy lost per unit path
    length. (A force, actually)

29
Stopping PowersMacroscopic perspective (NR)
  • Point charge (-e) in macroscopically continuous
    medium
  • Response function (dielectric function, e)
    relates actual field to applied field
  • Field gives force--stopping power is -dW/dx
    (force)

30
Stopping powerBethe Formula (UR)
  • Very high energy stopping power given by Bethes
    formula
  • Parameter log(I) is roughly 10Z (eV)

31
Relativistic Stopping PowerAb Initio DatA
Model (ADAM)
  • Fernandez-Varea et al. Optical Data Model
    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. In Phys. Res. B 229
    (2005) 187.
  • Current theory reviewed by Fano (1963)
  • First ever stopping theory by Bethe (1930)

32
Relativistic Stopping PowerAb Initio DatA
Model (ADAM)
  • Data Model based on q0 broad spectrum
    measurements
  • Calculation requires q-dependant dielectric
    function

Im(-1/e(q,?))
Bethe Ridge
QKE(q)
33
Relativistic Stopping PowerAb Initio DatA
Model (ADAM)
  • Data Model based on q0 broad spectrum
    measurements.
  • Stopping power integral over all q and ?.
  • In practice need a simple extension to finite q.

Bethe Ridge
Model preserves f-sum rule Z(8)2p2(N/V)
34
Relativistic Stopping PowerAb Initio DatA
Model (ADAM)
  • Fernandez-Varea et al. Optical Data Model
    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. In Phys. Res. B 229
    (2005) 187.
  • Plug in model q-dependence
  • Perform all integrals except one analytically
  • Obtain stopping power (F) by numerical
    convolution with ab initio q0 dielectric
    loss-function.

35
Stopping powerBethe Formula (UR, special case)
  • Very high energies model of Fernandez-varea et
    al. reduces to the Bethe formula
  • Parameter log(I) is calculable material dependant
    property

36
Sample Calculation
1. Start with an Energy Loss Function (courtesy
of Micah)
37
SampleCalculation
2. Plug energy-loss function into stopping power
functional.
38
SampleCalculation
3. End up with a stopping power
39
Stopping Power Silver
40
Conclusions (Stopping Powers)
  • Calculated over wide energy range
  • Ab initio relativistic stopping powers and mean
    free paths compare well with experiment.
  • Further results in Sorini et al. Phys. Rev. B
    74, 165111 (2006).

41
Future Work (MDFFs)
  • Currently have many pretty pictures but not yet
    ready to compare with Ni L2,3 experiments
    Schattschneider et al..
  • Finish MDFF code for all core initial states.
  • Combine with Optical Code Goal 10eV.
  • Combine with TDDFT code to account for many body
    effects which become more important at low
    energies.

42
Thanks
  • Group Members John Rehr, Kevin Jorissen, Josh
    Kas, Hadley Lawler, Micah Prange, Yoshi Takimoto,
    Fernando Vila.
  • Others Aleksi Soininen, Zachary Levine, Tim
    Fister.
  • Committee Members Jerry Miller, Bruce Robinson,
    Larry Sorenson, Larry Yaffe.
  • Useful comments Rob J, Eric, Matt, Rob S, Andy.

43
(No Transcript)
44
BEGIN BACKUP SLIDES
45
(No Transcript)
46
Backup slide. Fluc-diss theorem
  • Relates density fluctuation to dissipative part
    of loss function (i.e. s(q,w) to eps(q,w))
  • Easy to see proportionality via sumrules

47
Meet the particles.
Vortex Rings?
Rotons?
  • Electrons Pointlike, Massive (m1), Charged
    (q-1), Spin ½.

Plasmons?
2. Photons Pointlike, Massless, Chargeless, Spin
1.
2. Instantaneous Coulomb Interaction Only.
Excitons?
Polaritons?
3. Nuclei Pointlike, Massive (mgtgt1000), Charged
(qZA), Classical.
3. Ion Core Small, Massive (mgtgt1000), Charged
(qZ), Classical.
Cooper Pairs?
4. Thats it!
Phonons?
Holes?
48
Basic Hamiltonian.
-
-
-
Periodic Effective muffin tin Potential
Periodic Potential of Ion Cores

49
t-matrix properties
  • Vanish if either spatial argument is outside of
    muffin tin.
  • Are diagonal in angular momentum expansion about
    site.
  • Made be chosen to be dimensionless.

50
Mixed Dynamic Form Factor
  • Thus we can write the MDFF as

Angular projected density.
Atomic matrix elements
51
Scattering and Dynamic Form Factors
  • Use Fermis Golden Rule
  • Separate Sample and Probe.

DFF def. on next page.
52
Mixed Dynamic Form Factor
  • But waitwho cares about the MIXED dynamic form
    factor?
  • Scattering of plane wave versus coherent
    superpositions.

Def. on next slide really
53
Mixed Dynamic Form Factor
Sum over final states is a pain. We need a good
way to preform this sum We need a Greens
Function FEFFs Greens function!
54
Central Atom Greens Function
  • It is useful to single out one site as the
    central atom.
  • Then solve for the central atom Greens function
    exactly.
  • The full Greens function can then be written as
    an expansion about the central atom.

55
Central and Scattering Wiggles
Scattering Part Added.
Central Atom Only.
56
RSMS Punchline
  • We now use all of our cute definitions and some
    useful site/angular-momentum matrix notation.
  • And find the RSMS Greens function.

Coefficients. See Rehr and Albers, Phys. Rev. B
41, 8139 (1990).
57
Mixed Dynamic Form Factor
  • Or, with a little massaging

58
(No Transcript)
59
(No Transcript)
60
(No Transcript)
61
What is Condensed Matter Physics?
  • Its tough to say.
  • We study the response of crystals (the sample) to
    various probes (photon, electron, neutron).
  • The particles are well known and the forces are
    well known.
  • The sample is the difficulty--it is really
    intractably difficult, so

62
MDFF Copper
Atomic BG only.
63
The Many-Body Hamiltonian
a number
Replace it with an average potential.
Periodic Potential of Ion Cores
This term is a problem.
Periodic Effective muffin tin Potential
64
Muffin Tin Potential.
65
Example One-Body Hamiltonian
  • One body effective potential
  • Independent electron states
  • Neglects exchange and correlation (i.e., all
    but mean effects of electron-electron interaction)

66
Relativistic Stopping PowerAb Initio DatA
Model (ADAM)
  • Fernandez-Varea et al. Optical Data Model
    Nucl. Instr. and Meth. In Phys. Res. B 229
    (2005) 187.
  • Extend q0 calculation of loss function (or
    optical data) to finite q via simple model.
  • Perform all integrals except one analytically.

Bethe Ridge
67
Many-Body Hamiltonian of Sample
Periodic Potential of Ion Cores
electron-electron interaction term
68
Example One-Body Hamiltonian
  • Electron sees effective one-body potential
  • Hartree approximation (product wavefunction)
  • Next step include exchange and correlation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com