Title: Mixed Dynamic Form Factors in Real Space'
 1(No Transcript) 
 2Mixed Dynamic Form Factorsand Stopping Powers
  3Outline
- Introduction Pictures, Experiments, and Theory 
 
-  Absorption and Scattering 
- Meat Mixed Dynamic Form Factor 
-  Stopping Power 
-  Results 
- Conclusions / Future Goals
4Scattering
Scattered probe particle
observer
Incident probe particle
Condensed matter sample 
 5X-ray Scattering Apparatus
Scattered X-rays
observer
Incident x-rays
sample 
 6Electron Scattering Apparatus
Video games
Incident electron
Sample
Scattered electron
Sample information is same regardless of probe 
 7Absorption
Transmitted x-ray beam
Incident x-ray beam
Sample (careful, its hot) 
 8Example Absorption Spectrum Cu
K edge 
 9Example Absorption Spectrum Cu(zoomed in on K 
Edge)
K Edge
EXAFS wiggles 
 10Example Condensed Matter System Sodium Metal
So, how do we describe a sample such as this? 
 11We use a Greens functions
- Feffs Greens Function 
- Sample described as collection of potentials 
 centered at each lattice point
12Many body effects
- Must incorporate loss for photoelectrons 
- Self-Energy 
- Works well for deep core absorption
Screened Coulomb potential 
 13Spherical Potentials
Currently a necessary approximation for real 
systems  
 14Muffin Tin Potentials
interstitial level 
 15Key Approximations
- Ion Cores condensed into a lattice and create 
 periodic potential
- Electrons roughly independent particles 
- Muffin tins replace unit cells 
- Spherical symmetry within tins 
- Good approximations for high energy (x-ray energy 
 region) probes
16More AbsorptionPictures 
 17Multiple Scattering Greens Function
- Exploits spherical symmetry about sites 
- Exploits flatness of interstitial region 
- Physically motivated. Can be calculated (FEFF)
18Uses for FEFFs Greens function
Use it to sum over states in your golden rule 
based calculations of 
 19Uses for FEFFs Greens function
1. X-ray absorption
Incoming photon polarization
A core state 
 20Approximations seem to work! 
 21Uses for FEFFs Greens function
2. Electron scattering my current interest
Double differential cross section
Dynamic form factor
Momentum transfer
Energy loss 
 22(No Transcript) 
 23Uses for FEFFs Greens function
3. Coherent electron scattering
Mixed Dynamic Form Factor 
 24MDFF Experimental Motivation
- Application which Delights in MDFF Scattering 
 perpendicular q and q Schattschneider et al.,
 Nature 441, 486 (2006) mimics dichroism signal
 of x-ray absorption.
- Application which Abhors yet needs MDFF Electron 
 diffraction of Bloch waves in microscopy.
25MDFF GeCl4(dipole approximation good) 
 26MDFF Copper
Full MDFF
P-Projected MDFF 
 27MDFF Nickel 
 28Application to Stopping PowersMicroscopic 
perspective 
- The double differential cross section for 
 electron scattering can be written in terms of
 the dynamic form factor.
- Mean free path is simply related to the total 
 cross section
- Stopping power is the energy lost per unit path 
 length. (A force, actually)
29Stopping PowersMacroscopic perspective (NR) 
- Point charge (-e) in macroscopically continuous 
 medium
- Response function (dielectric function, e) 
 relates actual field to applied field
- Field gives force--stopping power is -dW/dx 
 (force)
30Stopping powerBethe Formula (UR)
- Very high energy stopping power given by Bethes 
 formula
- Parameter log(I) is roughly 10Z (eV) 
31Relativistic Stopping PowerAb Initio DatA 
Model (ADAM)
- Fernandez-Varea et al. Optical Data Model 
 Nucl. Instr. and Meth. In Phys. Res. B 229
 (2005) 187.
- Current theory reviewed by Fano (1963) 
- First ever stopping theory by Bethe (1930) 
32Relativistic Stopping PowerAb Initio DatA 
Model (ADAM)
- Data Model based on q0 broad spectrum 
 measurements
- Calculation requires q-dependant dielectric 
 function
Im(-1/e(q,?))
Bethe Ridge
QKE(q) 
 33Relativistic Stopping PowerAb Initio DatA 
Model (ADAM)
- Data Model based on q0 broad spectrum 
 measurements.
- Stopping power integral over all q and ?. 
- In practice need a simple extension to finite q. 
Bethe Ridge
Model preserves f-sum rule Z(8)2p2(N/V) 
 34Relativistic Stopping PowerAb Initio DatA 
Model (ADAM)
- Fernandez-Varea et al. Optical Data Model 
 Nucl. Instr. and Meth. In Phys. Res. B 229
 (2005) 187.
- Plug in model q-dependence 
- Perform all integrals except one analytically 
- Obtain stopping power (F) by numerical 
 convolution with ab initio q0 dielectric
 loss-function.
35Stopping powerBethe Formula (UR, special case)
- Very high energies model of Fernandez-varea et 
 al. reduces to the Bethe formula
- Parameter log(I) is calculable material dependant 
 property
36Sample Calculation
1. Start with an Energy Loss Function (courtesy 
of Micah) 
 37SampleCalculation
2. Plug energy-loss function into stopping power 
functional. 
 38SampleCalculation
3. End up with a stopping power 
 39Stopping Power Silver 
 40Conclusions (Stopping Powers)
- Calculated over wide energy range 
- Ab initio relativistic stopping powers and mean 
 free paths compare well with experiment.
- Further results in Sorini et al. Phys. Rev. B 
 74, 165111 (2006).
41Future Work (MDFFs)
- Currently have many pretty pictures but not yet 
 ready to compare with Ni L2,3 experiments
 Schattschneider et al..
- Finish MDFF code for all core initial states. 
- Combine with Optical Code Goal 10eV. 
- Combine with TDDFT code to account for many body 
 effects which become more important at low
 energies.
42Thanks
- Group Members John Rehr, Kevin Jorissen, Josh 
 Kas, Hadley Lawler, Micah Prange, Yoshi Takimoto,
 Fernando Vila.
- Others Aleksi Soininen, Zachary Levine, Tim 
 Fister.
- Committee Members Jerry Miller, Bruce Robinson, 
 Larry Sorenson, Larry Yaffe.
- Useful comments Rob J, Eric, Matt, Rob S, Andy.
43(No Transcript) 
 44BEGIN BACKUP SLIDES 
 45(No Transcript) 
 46Backup slide. Fluc-diss theorem
- Relates density fluctuation to dissipative part 
 of loss function (i.e. s(q,w) to eps(q,w))
- Easy to see proportionality via sumrules
47Meet the particles.
Vortex Rings?
Rotons?
- Electrons Pointlike, Massive (m1), Charged 
 (q-1), Spin ½.
Plasmons?
2. Photons Pointlike, Massless, Chargeless, Spin 
1.
2. Instantaneous Coulomb Interaction Only.
Excitons?
Polaritons?
3. Nuclei Pointlike, Massive (mgtgt1000), Charged 
(qZA), Classical.
3. Ion Core Small, Massive (mgtgt1000), Charged 
(qZ), Classical.
Cooper Pairs?
4. Thats it!
Phonons?
Holes? 
 48Basic Hamiltonian.
-
-
-
Periodic Effective muffin tin Potential
Periodic Potential of Ion Cores  
 49t-matrix properties
- Vanish if either spatial argument is outside of 
 muffin tin.
- Are diagonal in angular momentum expansion about 
 site.
- Made be chosen to be dimensionless.
50Mixed Dynamic Form Factor
- Thus we can write the MDFF as
Angular projected density.
Atomic matrix elements 
 51Scattering and Dynamic Form Factors
- Separate Sample and Probe.
DFF def. on next page. 
 52Mixed Dynamic Form Factor
- But waitwho cares about the MIXED dynamic form 
 factor?
- Scattering of plane wave versus coherent 
 superpositions.
Def. on next slide really 
 53Mixed Dynamic Form Factor
Sum over final states is a pain. We need a good 
way to preform this sum We need a Greens 
Function FEFFs Greens function! 
 54Central Atom Greens Function
- It is useful to single out one site as the 
 central atom.
- Then solve for the central atom Greens function 
 exactly.
- The full Greens function can then be written as 
 an expansion about the central atom.
55Central and Scattering Wiggles
Scattering Part Added.
Central Atom Only. 
 56RSMS Punchline
- We now use all of our cute definitions and some 
 useful site/angular-momentum matrix notation.
- And find the RSMS Greens function.
Coefficients. See Rehr and Albers, Phys. Rev. B 
41, 8139 (1990). 
 57Mixed Dynamic Form Factor
- Or, with a little massaging
58(No Transcript) 
 59(No Transcript) 
 60(No Transcript) 
 61What is Condensed Matter Physics?
- Its tough to say. 
- We study the response of crystals (the sample) to 
 various probes (photon, electron, neutron).
- The particles are well known and the forces are 
 well known.
- The sample is the difficulty--it is really 
 intractably difficult, so
62MDFF Copper
Atomic BG only. 
 63The Many-Body Hamiltonian
a number
Replace it with an average potential.
Periodic Potential of Ion Cores
This term is a problem.
Periodic Effective muffin tin Potential 
 64Muffin Tin Potential. 
 65Example One-Body Hamiltonian
- One body effective potential 
- Independent electron states 
- Neglects exchange and correlation (i.e., all 
 but mean effects of electron-electron interaction)
66Relativistic Stopping PowerAb Initio DatA 
Model (ADAM)
- Fernandez-Varea et al. Optical Data Model 
 Nucl. Instr. and Meth. In Phys. Res. B 229
 (2005) 187.
- Extend q0 calculation of loss function (or 
 optical data) to finite q via simple model.
- Perform all integrals except one analytically. 
Bethe Ridge 
 67Many-Body Hamiltonian of Sample
Periodic Potential of Ion Cores
electron-electron interaction term 
 68Example One-Body Hamiltonian
- Electron sees effective one-body potential 
- Hartree approximation (product wavefunction) 
- Next step include exchange and correlation