The Role of Human Perception in HumanRobot Interaction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The Role of Human Perception in HumanRobot Interaction

Description:

Male vs. female; youth vs. adult (heads only) ... Serious: Exercise task from study 2. Slight change: 'as many exercises as you can' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: rachelg2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Role of Human Perception in HumanRobot Interaction


1
The Role of Human Perception in Human-Robot
Interaction
  • Social Robotics Reading Group
  • 3 November 2003

2
Agenda
  • All Robots Are Not Created Equal The Design and
    Perception of Humanoid Robot Heads
  • Carl DiSalvo, Francine Gemperle, Jodi Forlizzi,
    Sara Kiesler
  • Matching Robot Appearance and Behavior to Tasks
    to Improve Human-Robot Cooperation
  • Jennifer Goetz, Sara Kiesler, Aaron Powers
  • Discussion

3
Paper 1, All Robots Are Not Created Equal
overview
  • Assumption A human-like head is desirable for
    human-robot interaction
  • Valid? See paper 2!
  • Question What makes a humanoid robotic head
    more (or less) human-like?
  • Study Survey

4
Method
  • Images of 48 robots from 3 categories
  • Research (e.g. Pearl)
  • Consumer Products (e.g. ASIMO)
  • Fiction (e.g. Transformer)
  • Images rated on a scale of 1 (Not very
    human-like) to 5 (Very human-like)
  • 20 participants per survey

5
Analysis Presence of features
  • Presence (or lack) of features is important
  • Nose, Eyelids, Mouth
  • Increase perception of humanness the most
  • More features more human-like

6
Analysis Dimensions
7
Analysis Comparison to human head
  • Prototypical human head average of
  • Mona Lisa
  • George Bush
  • Michelangelos David
  • Britney Spears
  • Most human-like robots very similar dimensions
  • Less human-like diverged

8
Conclusion Design Suggestions
9
How human-like is too human-like?
  • The Uncanny Valley
  • As a robot increases in humanness there is a
    point where the robot is not 100 similar to
    humans but the balance between humanness and
    machine-like is uncomfortable.

10
Paper 2, Matching Robot Appearance and
Behavior overview
  • Question How should service robots look and
    behave, so that people comply?
  • Example getting elderly to exercise
  • Three studies
  • 1. Preferences for humanlike robots in jobs
  • 2. Compliance with a playful or serious robot
  • 3. Study 2 plus entertaining vs. serious task
  • (Findings just presented at RO-MAN)

11
Study 1 Preferences for robots in jobs
  • Three stages of humanlikeness
  • Human
  • Midstage
  • Machine
  • Male vs. female youth vs. adult (heads only)
  • Survey which robot would be suitable for which
    jobs?
  • Robots presented in pairs (which would be more
    suitable for ltxgt?)

12
Study 1 results
  • Humanlike preferred over machinelike
  • Actress, drawing instructor (Artistic)
  • Retail clerk, sales representative (Enterprise)
  • Office clerk, hospital message carrier
    (Conventional)
  • Aerobics instructor, museum tour guide (Social)

13
Study 1 results (continued)
  • Machinelike preferred over humanlike
  • Lab assistant, customs inspector (Investigative)
  • Soldier, security guard (Realistic)

14
Study 2 Compliance with a serious or playful
robot,Background
  • Positivity hypothesis
  • More attractive, extroverted, cheerful robot will
    have greater compliance
  • Matching hypothesis
  • Appearance and behavior should match the
    seriousness of the situation

15
Study 2 Method
  • Pearl leads participant in exercise
  • Playful Close your eyes Relax Breathe in
    Dont forget to breathe out. I dont want you to
    pass out!
  • Serious Close your eyes Relax Breathe in
    Breathe out... Are you feeling relaxed?
  • Asked to exercise on own (as long as you can)

16
Study 2 Results
  • Compliance how long the participant exercised
  • Playful robot average of 25 seconds
  • Serious robot average of 53 seconds
  • Consistent with matching hypothesis
  • Manipulation check
  • Serious robot more conscientious, smarter
  • Playful robot more playful and witty (and
    obnoxious)

17
Study 3 Fun vs. Serious Task, overview
  • 2x2 design
  • Playful vs. Serious robot
  • Fun vs. Serious task
  • Tasks
  • Serious Exercise task from study 2
  • Slight change as many exercises as you can
  • Fun Jellybean task
  • Create recipes using gourmet jellybeans
  • As many combinations as you can

18
Study 3 Results
19
Conclusions
  • Match appearance and behavior to task
  • More humanlike appearance seems better for
    human-robot social interaction
  • Behavior needs to match task
  • What thresholds are appropriate?
  • How human in appearance?
  • How playful/serious?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com