Introduction to Public Health November 7, 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Introduction to Public Health November 7, 2004

Description:

Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) ... Health Education Quarterly 15:351-377, 1988. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: JudyBr8
Learn more at: https://commed.vcu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introduction to Public Health November 7, 2004


1
Introduction to Public HealthNovember 7, 2004
  • Community Assessment with Health Disparities
    Groups
  • Judith Bradford, Ph.D.
  • Community Health Research Initiative
  • Survey and Evaluation Research Lab
  • jbbradfo_at_vcu.edu

2
Defining the Population
3
Communities
  • Of geography, such as a group of Census tracts,
    or a county or city
  • Of individuals with shared characteristics, such
    as demographic and/or other personal
    characteristics
  • Of affiliation, such as faith communities

4
Critical Concepts
  • Community health is profoundly affected by the
    collective behaviors, attitudes, and beliefs of
    everyone who lives in/belongs to the community.
  • Partnerships are effective tools for improving
    health in communities.

5
Core Issues and Challenges
  • Definition of community members -- who is in the
    community?
  • Trustworthy understanding of their
    characteristics and needs.
  • Feasible methods of gathering needed information
    about them.
  • Effective methods for involving community members
    in assessment and interpretation.

6
Policy Framework
7
Healthy People Movement
  • 1979 The Surgeon Generals Report on Health
    Promotion and Disease Prevention
  • 1980 Promoting Health/Preventing Disease
  • HP2000 National Health Promotion and Disease
    Prevention Objectives

8
Healthy People 2010
  • Overarching purpose promoting health and
    preventing illness, disability, and premature
    death
  • ... grounded in science, built through public
    consensus, and designed to measure progress

9
Healthy People 2010
  • Two overarching goals
  • Increase quality and years of life
  • Eliminate health disparities
  • Format 467 objectives to improve health,
    organized into 28 focus areas.

10
HP2010 Perspective
  • increase life expectancy and quality of life
    over the next 10 years by helping individuals
    gain the knowledge, motivation, and opportunities
    they need to make informed decisions about their
    health
  • encourages local and state health leaders to
    develop community-wide and statewide efforts that
    promote healthy behaviors, create healthy
    environments, and increase access to high-quality
    health care.

11
Subgroups of Concern for Eliminating Disparities
  • Differences that occur by.
  • gender
  • race or ethnicity
  • education or income
  • disability
  • living in rural localities
  • sexual orientation

12
Major HP2010 Data Sources
  • National Health Interview Survey (NHIS)
  • National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
    (NHANES)
  • National Vital Statistics System - Mortality
    (NVSS-M)
  • School Health Policies and Programs Study (SHPPS)
  • National Survey of Family Growth
  • National Vital Statistics System - Natality
    (NVSS-N)
  • National Hospital Discharge Survey
  • National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHDA)
  • National Profile of Local Health Departments
    (NPLHD)
  • Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
    (BRFSS)
  • HIV/AIDS Case Surveillance System
  • Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS)
  • Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)

13
10 Leading Health Indicators
  • Physical activity
  • Overweight and obesity
  • Tobacco use
  • Substance abuse
  • Responsible sexual behavior
  • Mental health
  • Injury and violence
  • Environmental quality (social)
  • Immunization
  • Access to health care

14
Public Health Infrastructure
  • HP2010 Goal Ensure that ... health agencies have
    the infrastructure to provide essential public
    health services effectively
  • Data and information systems
  • Workforce
  • Public health organizations
  • Resources
  • Prevention research

15
Essential Public Health Services
  • Monitor heath status
  • Diagnose and investigate
  • Inform, educate, and empower
  • Mobilize community partnerships
  • Develop policies and plans
  • Enforce laws and regulations
  • Link people to personal health services
  • Assure a competent health care workforce
  • Evaluate effectiveness, accessibility, and
    quality
  • Research for new insights and solutions

16
Focus Areas - 1
  • Disability and secondary conditions
  • Educational and community-based programs
  • Environmental health
  • Family planning
  • Food safety
  • Health communication
  • Access to quality health services
  • Arthritis, osteoporosis, and chronic back
    conditions
  • Cancer
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Diabetes

17
Focus Areas - 2
  • Heart disease and stroke
  • HIV
  • Immunization and infectious diseases
  • Injury and violence prevention
  • Maternal, infant, and child health
  • Medical product safety
  • Mental health and mental disorders
  • Nutrition and overweight
  • Occupational safety and health
  • Oral health

18
Focus Areas - 3
  • Physical activity and fitness
  • Public health infrastructure
  • Respiratory diseases
  • Sexually transmitted diseases
  • Substance abuse
  • Tobacco use
  • Vision and hearing

19
Limitations of Current System forHP2010
Community Assessment
  • Disparities populations .
  • are not always easy to find
  • are sometimes difficult to define (and therefore
    to count)
  • may be poorly understood by the system
  • may have low political/social priority
  • may even be considered less valuable or otherwise
    inconvenient

20
For example, sampling for heath needs of LGBT
communities
  • Whats the question?
  • Who is in the community?
  • On a scale of 1 - 10.
  • How complete are available data?
  • How difficult to obtain currently unavailable
    data?
  • Which sampling strategies are most effective?

21
Using existing data sets
  • How to determine the distribution of identified
    cases in a geographic area defined by Census
    tracts?
  • (using same-sex HH data from 1990 2000
    difficulty 2)

22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
How to capture reliable data on the local health
priorities of sexual minority African American
women?
  • No existing federal data system contains directly
    relevant data.
  • Successful example Community forum and priority
    setting through partnership with community
    organizations.
  • Difficulty 8

25
How to determine the HIV risks and prevention
needs of Transgender persons in Virginia?
  • No existing federal data system will do this.
  • Web-based and mail-back surveys.
  • Strategies set up field study with regional
    managers and gatekeepers from careful
    translation of concepts even more careful
    selection of survey administrators.
  • Anticipated difficulty 10

26
Conclusions
  • Current public health data systems are inadequate
    for comprehensive community assessment.
  • There is a disconnect between HP2010 goals and
    readiness of public health infrastructure to
    fully respond.
  • Additional assessment methods must be carefully
    chosen to fit the community of interest and
    challenges it presents.
  • Effective participation by community of interest
    is critical.

27
The need for social-behavioral research
  • the nature of human relationships the degree
    to which an individual is interconnected and
    embedded in a community is vital to an
    individuals health and well-being as well as to
    the health and vitality of entire populations.

Berkman LF, Glass T. Social integration, social
networks, social support and health, in Social
Epidemiology, Berkman LF and Kawachi I, Eds. New
York Oxford University Press, 2000.
28
What are our major challenges in conducting LGBT
assessments?
  1. Acknowledging, accepting disparities within LGBT
    communities.
  2. Placing higher priority on least understood
    areas.
  3. Recognizing the power and implications of
    cultural context for LGBT health.
  4. Finding common cause and forming strong
    affiliations to work across dividing lines.

29
So many questions
  1. Who is the population we wish to study?
  2. What factors influence their lives and lead to
    health disparities?
  3. What are the questions we need to ask and answer?
  4. What methods are best to use?
  5. How do we put it all together?

30
Social-Ecological Model for Levels of Influence
  • McElroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz . An
    ecological perspective on health promotion
    programs. Health Education Quarterly 15351-377,
    1988.

31
  • Public Policy local, state and federal
    government policies, regulations, and laws
  • Community social networks, standards and
    practices among organizations
  • Institutional/Organ-izational rules, policies,
    procedures, environment, and informal structures
    within an organization or system
  • Interpersonal family, friends, peers that
    provide social identity, support and identity
  • Individual awareness, knowledge, attitudes,
    beliefs, values, preferences

32
Community-based participatory research
  • CBPR
  • recognizes community as a unit of identity
  • builds on strengths and resources within the
    community
  • Facilitates collaborative, equitable partnership
    in all phases of the research
  • Promotes co-learning and capacity building among
    all partners
  • Integrates and achieves a balance between
    research and action for the mutual benefit of all
    partners

33
  • CBPR
  • emphasizes local relevance of public health
    problems and ecological perspectives that
    recognize and attend to the multiple determinants
    of health and disease.
  • involves systems development through a cyclical
    and iterative process.
  • disseminates findings and knowledge gained to all
    partners and involves all partners in the
    dissemination process.
  • involves a long-term process and commitment.
  • Minkler M, Wallerstein N (Eds.). Community Based
    Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco
    Jossey-Bass Co., 2003.

34
Contributions to the field of social and
behavioral health from LGBT health disparities
studies
  1. Communities cannot be usefully studied without
    their own participation, through partnership and
    with mutual accountability.
  2. As we do this work together, we are learning, and
    with each step forward, there is a general
    increase in knowledge. We are using what we
    learn.
  3. LGBT community research provides a model for use
    by others a foundation that can be built upon
    to address and to learn from diversity.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com