Democracy and Democratisation in Central and Eastern Europe - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Democracy and Democratisation in Central and Eastern Europe

Description:

Royal coup, fascist-leaning military junta. King Ferdinand, Alexandru Averescu. 1920 ... Kun. March 1919. Hungary. Clerico-Fascist, German puppet. Jozef Tiso ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:158
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: UIB9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Democracy and Democratisation in Central and Eastern Europe


1
Democracy and Democratisation in Central and
Eastern Europe
In Poland democratisation took 10 years, in
Hungary 10 months, in East Germany 10 weeks, in
Czechoslovakia 10 days, and in Romania 10
hours. Timothy Garton Ash in The New York Review
of Books January 18th 1990
2
Crucial events
  • Collapse of Non-democratic Regime
  • The Last Days of Communist Rule
  • Through Establishing Rules of the Game
  • The Roundtables
  • Towards Generally Accepted Changes of Power based
    on Democratic Elections
  • 2. or 3. Election

3
Transition to and Consolidation of Democracy
Governmental Consensus?
Civil War Repression
Voluntary Mediation?
HR tribunal/ Round Table/ Truth Commission
International Military Intervention
War Crimes tribunal/ International
detention/ Exiling
New regime government comprised of former
dissidents
Acceptance by Old regime?
Breakdown
Breakdown
4
Transition to and Consolidation of Democracy
5
Transition to and Consolidation of Democracy
Governmental Consensus?
All party government comprised of former enemies
Rules established! From Transition phase
to Consolidation phase
Constitutional Convention?
New regime government comprised of former
dissidents
Acceptance by Old regime?
Breakdown
Post-revolutionary authoritarian regime New
elite rule
Breakdown
6
Transition to and Consolidation of Democracy
Practicing inclusive citizenship rights?
Rules established! From Transition phase
to Consolidation phase
Democracy based on universal citizenship
Ethnic or Sexist democracy
Inter- national monitoring and/or sanctions?
7
Transition to and Consolidation of Democracy
Not actively discouraging Civil Society?
Supporting an independent Judiciary?
Participatory democracy with active organizations
Democracy based on the Rule of Law
Democracy based on universal citizenship
Elitist or personalized democracy
Politicized Judiciary
Inter- national monitoring and/or sanctions?
Inter- national monitoring and/or sanctions?
8
Transition to and Consolidation of Democracy
Creating Good Governance?
Enacting standards of social and economic welfare?
Bureaucratic, predictable and sound government
Democracy based on the Rule of Law
Redistributive democracy
Particularism and corruption
Poverty and exploitation
Inter- national monitoring and/or sanctions?
Inter- national monitoring and/or sanctions?
9
Transition to and Consolidation of Democracy
Promoting indulgence in terms of culture and
gender?
Acceptable standards for the electoral process?
Tolerant and emancipated democracy
Redistributive democracy
Free and fair elections
Cultural and sexual repression
Fraudulent or partly fraudulent elections
Inter- national monitoring and/or sanctions?
Allowing international election observers?
10
Transition
-
-

Turkmenistan Kazakhstan
-
Old Brezhnev appointees keep ruling
-


-
Initial agree- ment with dissidents
Lukashenko after 2. election
Belarus

-
-
-
Dudayev Russian intervention
Chechnya


-
-
NATO intervention in Serbia
Bosnia/ Herzegovina
The Dayton Accord



-
All other countries
Roundtable
Consensus and tacit agreement
Constitution or democratic interpretation
11
Problems of Consolidation
  • Universal Citizenship
  • All residents are citizens
  • Active organisations
  • Civil Society
  • The Rule of Law
  • Independent Judiciary
  • Non-Corruption
  • Good governance
  • Redistributive capacity
  • Welfare state
  • Non-Discrimination
  • Ethnic and Gender Equality
  • Non-Fraudulent
  • Free and fair elections

Particular problems in Estonia and
Latvia (Russians) and for Roma and Sinti in the
South-East
Many small organisations, but a low membership
rate in the population. A general problem
Strong variations. Judicial competence and
independence are related phenomena
Corruption generally conforms to an west to east
and a north to south pattern in Europe
Weakest in some of the most modern countries,
somewhat stronger in a few of the least developed
countries
Historical and cultural variations
Electoral fraud occurs, but by far the most
common problem are mistakes caused by
inexperience and incompetance
12
The History of Democratisation
  • 1900-1914
  • Reforms in all four Empires which dominated the
    region
  • 1917-1939
  • A steadily reduced number of surviving
    democracies established after WWI
  • 1945-1947/48
  • Aborted democratisation after WWII and before the
    Cold War
  • 1956 and 1968
  • Crushed democratic rebellions in Hungary and
    Czechoslovakia
  • 1989-
  • Present democratisation period
  • Post Communist until 1994/95
  • Pre EU/NATO after 1995

13
A revision of Rokkans conceptual map to fit the
situation in Central and Eastern Europe
  • External and interface periphery states
  • Rokkan treats the eastern periphery states as
    external, while their histories are dominated by
    being interface peripheries between western
    empire stats and eastern historical empires
  • Religious extension
  • Rokkans map only includes the countries of
    western Christianity
  • Orthodoxy must be included as well as
  • Islam, to cover the state- and nation-building
    processes of all contemporary European democracies

14
A revised conceptual map
Religious heritage
Early states formed in cores of Western seaward
empires
Late, devolved states from Central European
empires
Late, devolved states from Eastern empires
Eastern empires
Late, devolved Western periphery states
City belt Europe
States based on former core nations of Central
European empire states

Protestant counties
Denmark UK Prot.
Finland Prot.
Estonia Latvia Prot.
Iceland Norway (Scotland) (Wales) Prot.
Sweden Prot.

Mixed or substantially secularized countries
France Sec./Cath.
Czechoslov. Czech Rep. Cath./Sec.
Belarus Ukraine Orth./Sec./ Cath
Russia USSR Sec./ Orth.
(Ulster) Prot./Cath.
Netherlands Switzerland Prot./Cath/ Sec.
Germany Prot./Cath./ Sec..
Counter- reformation countries non-secularized O
rthodox countries
Spain Portugal Cath.
Slovakia Rest Italy Slovenia Croatia Cath.
.
Lithuania Poland Cath. Romania Bulgaria Serbia FYR
OM Greece Orth.
Eire Cath.
Belgium N-Italy Cath
Austria Hungary Cath.
.




Turkey Mus./ Sec.
BiH (Fed.) Mus./Sec./ Cath.
Albania Kosovo Mus./Sec.
Muslim countries
15
A revised conceptual map
Religious heritage
Late, devolved Western periphery states
Early states formed in cores of Western seaward
empires
City belt Europe
States based on former core nations of Central
European empire states
Late, devolved states from Central European
empires
Late, devolved states from Eastern empires
Eastern empires

Protestant counties
Iceland Norway (Scotland) (Wales) Prot.
Denmark UK Prot.
Sweden Prot.
Finland Prot.
Estonia Latvia Prot.

Mixed or substantially secularized countries
(Ulster) Prot./Cath.
Netherlands Switzerland Prot./Cath/ Sec.
France Sec./Cath.
Germany Prot./Cath./ Sec..
Czechoslov. Czech Rep. Cath./Sec.
Belarus Ukraine Orth./Sec./ Cath
Russia USSR Sec./ Orth.
Counter- reformation countries non-secularized O
rthodox countries
Eire Cath.
Spain Portugal Cath.
Belgium N-Italy Cath
Austria Hungary Cath.
Slovakia Rest Italy Slovenia Croatia Cath.
.
Lithuania Poland Cath. Romania Bulgaria Serbia FYR
OM Greece Orth.
.




Turkey Mus./ Sec.
Albania Kosovo Mus./Sec.
Muslim countries
16
The Central and East European Space
Religious heritage
Late, devolved Western periphery states
Early states formed in cores of Western seaward
empires
City belt Europe
States based on former core nations of Central
European empire states
Late, devolved states from Central European
empires
Late, devolved states from Eastern empires
Eastern empires

Protestant counties
Iceland Norway (Scotland) (Wales) Prot.
Denmark UK Prot.
Sweden Prot.
Finland Prot.
Estonia Latvia Prot.

Mixed or substantially secularized countries
(Ulster) Prot./Cath.
Netherlands Switzerland Prot./Cath/ Sec.
France Sec./Cath.
Germany Prot./Cath./ Sec..
Czechoslov. Czech Rep. Cath./Sec.
Belarus Ukraine Orth./Sec./ Cath
Russia USSR Sec./ Orth.
Counter- reformation countries non-secularized O
rthodox countries
Eire Cath.
Spain Portugal Cath.
Belgium N-Italy Cath
Austria Hungary Cath.
Slovakia Rest Italy Slovenia Croatia Cath.
.
Lithuania Poland Cath. Romania Bulgaria Serbia FYR
OM Greece Orth.
.




Turkey Mus./ Sec.
Albania Kosovo Mus./Sec.
Muslim countries
17
Cultural parameters
18
The breakdown of democracy
19
Democratic survival classification of European
countries in inter-war Europe (short-lived and
semi-independent state formations are
parenthesized)
20
Democratic survival classification of European
countries in inter-war Europe (short-lived and
semi-independent state formations are
parenthesized)
21
Democracy and ethnicityDoes nation building
matter?
  • Is reduced ethnic strife conducive to democracy?
  • Reducing ethnicity has a sombre background

22
Ethnic cleansing and resettlement, 194549
Source Crampton and Crampton 1996
23
Types of ethnic homogeneity in central and east
european states
  • Stable approximate nation-states stable
    definition of the majority nationality, large
    majorities
  • Newer approximate nation-states stable
    definition of the majority nationality, large
    majorities today but smaller majorities in the
    inter-war era
  • Recent approximate nation-states devolved from
    dissolved Mini-Empires large or medium-large
    majorities today, small majorities or minorities
    prior to the recent dissolution of the
    Mini-Empire states
  • Former approximate nation-states with a decreased
    majority population today

24
(No Transcript)
25
  • The censuses of the inter-war period are
    generally unreliable in their estimates of the
    size of ethnic minorities. The figures are,
    nevertheless, interesting as expressions of
    perceived size of regime-proclaimed core
    populations.
  • For Bulgarias current ethnic population our
    source only indicates that national minorities
    exceed 10 per cent.
  • The Polish inter-war estimates are highly
    questionable. Polish nationality was at last
    partly determined by the ability of the
    respondent to understand the census-taker when
    addressed in Polish.
  • Source Berglund and Aarebrot 1997, 161 data
    from Crampton and Crampton 1996

26
Classification of countries by ethnic diversity
and diasporas
  • Reborn and new states with majoritarian national
    core populations
  • Approximate nation states with dominant national
    core populations
  • without substantial diasporas in neighbouring
    countries
  • with diasporas in neighbouring countries
  • States with strong national core populations, but
    with interface minorities from neighbouring
    countries core nationalities
  • Reborn states with majoritarian national core
    populations, but with national minorities
    comprising the core populations of neighbouring
    former historical empires
  • Former historical empires, presently large states
    with a majoritarian core population

27
Ukraine Belarus Russians
Serbia In B-H Albanians
28
Challenges to Statehood Territorial integrity
Weak High likelihood of containing challenges as
maifest cleavages within a democratic polity
Strong Possible difficulties in containing
nationalist demands based on seperatism or
irredentism
Challenges to nationhood Secular dominance
Challenges to the nation-state The imperial
heritage
Ukraine Belarus Russians
Strong Possible difficulties in containing
nationalism in combination with religious or
secular cleavages
Very strong in a situation of a possible combined
territorial and religious challenge
Serbia In B-H Albanians
29
Political stability and democracy
  • Political fragmentation
  • An exaggerated problem?
  • A temporal problem
  • New cleavages rather than historical cleavages
  • Is cleavage continuity necessarily a good thing?
  • Increasing similarities to the rest of Europe?
  • Continuity of political style across regimes

30
Three dimensions of continuity and their impact
on the cleavage structure
1900
1939
1989
31
Lessons from history
  • Central and Eastern European democracy have
    already today endured longer than during the
    inter-war years
  • Why? Six possible answers
  • European integration and realistic mutual defence
    are real prospects
  • A paradoxical legacy of communism High education
    levels and prospective larger middle classes than
    ever before
  • Economies less dependent on the primary sector
    than ever before. Modernization
  • Stable monetary policies
  • Present, but fewer national minorities than
    during the inter-war years
  • Secularization, another legacy of communism?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com