Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors

Description:

Developed a high performance electric sports car ... Toyota Prius - Hybrid. Internal Rivalry. Tesla Roadster - Electric. Internal Rivalry ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:5071
Avg rating:1.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: charle167
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors


1
Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors
2
Outline
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Case for the Electric Car
  • Internal Rivalry
  • Barriers to entry
  • Substitutes and complements
  • Supplier Power
  • Buyer Power
  • Strategy

3
Tesla Motors
Tesla Motors
  • California based start-up company
  • Developed a high performance electric sports car
  • Initial funding (60m) provided by PayPal, eBay
    and Google Founders
  • Car does 0-60 mph in about 4 seconds
  • Car can travel 250 miles between charges
  • First 100 vehicles have been sold at the asking
    price of 100k

4
Industry Facts
Industry Facts
  • Transportation accounts for 63 of Oil Demand

5
Industry Facts
Industry Facts
6
Industry Facts
Industry Facts
7
Industry Facts
Industry Facts
  • US Automobile Industry represents 5 of Private
    sector GDP
  • 76 of the market is made up of Ford, GM and
    Chrysler
  • 18 of sales are from Japanese car makers
  • 6.6m Americans are directly or indirectly
    employed in the automotive industry.
  • Hybrid sales represented 1.2 of the market in
    2005, 1.6 in 2006 (est).
  • Forecasts estimate 5 of car sales will be
    hybrids by 2013

8
Market Definition
Case for the Electric Car
  • Environmental friendliness and low emissions
  • High performance
  • Improved battery technologies and driving range
  • Electric cars are more energy efficient than
    gasoline cars.

9
Tesla Motors
Efficiency vs. Performance
10
Internal Rivalry
Internal Rivalry
  • A green vehicle
  • Reduces consumption of petroleum
  • Uses renewable energy sources
  • Has Low emissions
  • Is Fuel efficient
  • Within the green vehicle market there are four
    types
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Flexible-Fuel Vehicles
  • Hydrogen Vehicles
  • Hybrid Vehicles

11
Internal Rivalry
GM EV1 Early Electric
12
Internal Rivalry
Honda Insight Early Hybrid
13
Internal Rivalry
Toyota Prius - Hybrid
14
Internal Rivalry
Tesla Roadster - Electric
15
Internal Rivalry
Venturi Fetish - Electric
16
Entry
Barriers to Entry
  • Economies of Scale
  • Regulation Issues
  • Technological Innovations
  • Brand Loyalty
  • Infrastructure

17
Substitutes
Substitutes
  • Hybrids
  • Flex Fuel
  • Hydrogen
  • Diesel
  • Compressed Natural Gas
  • Mass Transportation

18
Energy Efficiency
Energy Efficiency
19
Energy Efficiency
Energy Efficiency
20
Complements
Complements
  • Government tax breaks
  • Utility incentive programs
  • Free Parking at Airports
  • Single Occupancy use of carpool lanes
  • No parking meter fees
  • 50 discount by California utilities for
    changing electric cars

21
Supplier Power
Supplier Power
  • Lotus main outsourcing partner
  • Lotus is providing chassis, body and building
    Tesla Roadster at Lotus factory in England
  • AC Propulsion drive train
  • Lithium Ion battery
  • Flexibility to adopt new technologies

22
Buyer Power
Buyer Power
  • Ability of buyer to extract profits from seller
  • Green market is emerging
  • Buyer power is limited due to lack of competition

23
Buyer Power
Buyer Power
24
Conclusion
Conclusion
  • Short to medium term strategy
  • Sell 100 Roadsters
  • Create recognizable product
  • Self funding of future expansion plans
  • Change opinion of electric vehicles

25
Conclusion
Conclusion
  • Long term strategy
  • Focus on brand recognition
  • Cost optimization
  • Compete in mass market
  • Build infrastructure

26
Conclusion
Martin Eberhard, CEO
There have been tons and tons of companies, for
the last 40 years that have tried to make little
commuter electric cars. The trouble is that, for
the most part, it requires the buyer of such a
car to change his or her nature. Youre buying a
car that is not as good as an equivalent gas car
at allslower, uglier, with not as much rangeand
theyre trying to compete essentially on price,
where they cant win. None of those cars were
built for people who really like to drive. I get
the feeling theyre for people who dont really
think you should be driving, but think if you do
have to drive, it should be an electric car. I
think if you build a car for people as they are,
not requiring them to change their nature, its
much more likely for you to succeed. And I think
our investors agree.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com