Title: The reaction
1- The reaction
- p d ? 3He p0 ?
- is interesting since
- we want to find out how baryon resonances are
involved in the meson production - we want to know more about the p0-? final state
interaction - the final state interaction of the p0-? system
might give further information about the a0(980)
resonance, which possibly has a qq-qq structure
rather than a simple qq structure. The new higher
maximum energy available at CELSIUS highly
improves our chances to succeed in this point
since the p0-? invariant mass approaches the mass
of the a0(980) resonance
2- What will be done?
- the cross section of the reaction will be
measured at several beam energies - at one beam energy, the angular distributions and
the invariant mass distributions of the final
state particles will be studied in more detail - we should also be able to measure the cross
section of the reaction - p d ? 3He ?
- for the case where ? decays into p0 ?, with the
same trigger conditions as for the p0-?
production -
3- What has been done?
- the reactions of interest and some background
reactions have been simulated in order to get an
idea of the detector acceptance and to find
suitable trigger conditions - a deuterium pellet target has been available
since February 2004 - the maximum beam energy available at CELSIUS has
been increased from 1360 MeV to 1450 MeV - several shifts have been used for feasibility
studies -
4(No Transcript)
5Problems 1. The count rate in the FD is much
larger than expected from the luminosity
estimated from the cross section of the known
quasi free pp ? pp? ?Might be due to beam halo
interacting with the material in the beam pipe
?The possibility of improving the situation
using scrapers is under investigation 2. New
trigger schemes have to be developed. The
reaction of interest contains one 3He in the
final state. A good trigger that selects events
containing 3He is needed
6- 3He trigger developements
- We have been testing a requirement on high energy
deposit in the Window Detector, that according to
MC simulations would be highly selective. - But the preliminary data analysis shows that it
is very hard to get clean events corresponding to
3He production. - Some of the problem are that
- we expect one track only in the FD, but we get on
average more than two - a true 3He track giving a high energy deposit in
the WD is expected to give a high energy deposit
in the downstream detector layers, but offline
analysis shows that most tracks dont! - ?this points towards fake tracks that could be
due to large angle scattering close to the WD
7(No Transcript)
8- Possible trigger improvements
- a condition requiring high energy deposit in the
Window Detector AND in some of the detector
layers downstream - the WD
- a condition requiring one and only one hit in
the WD - a condition requiring one and only one hit in
the third layer of the JH - Offline analysis shows that the conditions above
give a clearer sample of 3He events. -
9Analysis of data from March 2004, Tp1450
MeV, to test different trigger conditions
Obviously, the conditions mentioned give the
highest fraction of 3He events
fwche3frha1vfhdsvps
1.53 MA11
10- Where are we now?
- the CA80 experiment has not yet been able to run
in a production mode but only for general
developments - the charge of shifts to this experiment is
presently a matter of book-keeping between
different experiments rather than a reflection of
how much time that has been specifically devoted
for the study of the - p0-? production
11- Assuming
- a luminosity of 21030
- a detector acceptance of 20 (from simulations)
- trigger efficiency, detector efficiency, data
acquisition efficiency, data analysing efficiency
of 50 in total - a p d ? 3He p0 ? cross section of 35 nb
- would give about 200 p d ? 3He p0 ? events per
shift
12Beamtime request Considering the experimental
situation with further trigger improvement and
background reduction, we request 30 shifts to
continue the CA80 experiment