P1253296662QqCij - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

P1253296662QqCij

Description:

Resilience as defined by contemporary researchers (Masten & Powell, 2003) ... particularly male youth (e.g., adult education, alternative school models) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: Sop136
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: P1253296662QqCij


1
(No Transcript)
2
Resilience in Youth with Histories of Homelessness
  • Sophie Hyman, Tim Aubry, Fran Klodawsky
  • Centre for Research on Community Services
  • University of Ottawa

3
Context of Homelessness in Youth
  • Adolescent homelessness is a critical social
    problem
  • Spectrum of risks inherent in living on street
  • There exists a remarkable subgroup of youth who
    exit homelessness and re-integrate into
    mainstream society
  • Resilience as defined by contemporary researchers
    (Masten Powell, 2003)
  • Resilience in homeless adolescence is
    characterized by
  • Mobilization of intrapersonal, social, and
    community resources, which leads to resilience.
  • Resilience, in turn produces positive
    adaptations
  • Re-housing, re-enrollment in school, and or
    employment

4
Possible Outcomes of Youth in This Study
  • In 2002 / 2003, all (N 141) youth were homeless
  • In 2004/2005, N 99 (n 49 male, 50 female)
    youth were re-interviewed. The circumstances of
    these youth place them into categories of
    following outcomes
  • I) Housed/not housed
  • ii) working/not working
  • iii) in school/not in school
  • The hallmarks of normative development in
    adolescence are secure housing, and engagement in
    school and/or work.
  • For youth with histories of homelessness, the
    achievement of this level of functioning will
    indicate resilience from the adversity of their
    homeless experiences.

5
Table 1 Housing, education, and vocational
status of youth at follow-up
Male Youth (n 49) Female Youth (n 50)
Housed 67 90
In school 14 42
Working 33 38
Statistically significant differences between
male and female youth, p. lt05, at
lt.01 Female youth were more likely than male
youth to have housing or be in school.
6
Table 2 Outcomes based on circumstances at
follow up
Male Youth (n 49) Female Youth (n 50)
Socially excluded 27 4
In transition 37 38
Resilient 37 58
Statistically significant differences between
male and female youth, p. lt05, at lt.01Male
youth were more likely than female youth to be
socially excludedFemale youth were more likely
than male youth to be resilient
  • SOCIALLY EXCLUDED Still homeless, not in school
    and/or not working
  • IN TRANSITION Housing instability and/or not
    working and/or not in school
  • RESILIENT Stable housing, in school and/or
    working

7
Summary
  • Almost a third of youth (29) in the study
    exhibit at follow-up resilience (developmental
    functioning at the level of their peers)
  • A small minority of youth (15) remain socially
    excluded at follow-up, suggesting that they are
    at risk for chronic housing problems
  • Although a majority of youth in the study ( 79)
    are housed at follow-up, a minority are
    participating in schooling (29) or working (35)
  • Outcomes for male youth are poorer when compared
    to female youth, particularly in terms of housing
    stability and educational engagement.
  • How can we understand these youths different
    circumstances as well as the gender differences
    in our results?

8
Focus of Dissertation Research
  • Goal
  • Development of a prediction model of resilience
    in adolescents with a history of homelessness.
  • Purpose
  • To test how risk and protective factors
    interface, enabling some homeless youth to secure
    housing, which further increases the likelihood
    of re-integration into mainstream society.

9
Predictors in Proposed Model
  • Social Context
  • Adequate perceived social support
  • Supportive mentor relationships
  • Community Context
  • Connectivity to supportive community resources
  • Psychological predictors
  • Prosocial tendencies
  • High approach coping
  • Low avoidance coping

10
Model To Be Tested In Dissertation
11
Implications at this Juncture
  • Early descriptive results from the youth sample
    of the panel study on homelessness point strongly
    towards a need for
  • Programming specifically targeting male youth
    with who are at risk of chronic homelessness
    (e.g., outreach, transitional housing)
  • Programming re-engaging youth to return to
    school, particularly male youth (e.g., adult
    education, alternative school models)
  • Programming focused on developing marketable
    work skills for those youth who have left school
    and are working (e.g., vocational training,
    apprenticeships)
  • Mental health programming for male youth
    separate from female youth, especially targeting
    high-risk behaviour and suicidality (results from
    adolescent study of at-risk youth)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com