Ethical and Social Issues in SocialBehavioral Science Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Ethical and Social Issues in SocialBehavioral Science Research

Description:

African-American Ethnic Identity. Personal ID Risk. Population Genetics of Garifuna ... Potential to change community power structure, and affect sampling strategy ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: resear52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ethical and Social Issues in SocialBehavioral Science Research


1
Ethical and Social Issues inSocial/Behavioral
Science Research
  • Dennis H. ORourke
  • Co-Chair, University of Utah IRB
  • 3 August
    2007

2
Isolation, Identity and Community
  • Geographic
  • Sardinia, Iceland, Pacific Islands, Mountain
    Valleys, Arctic
  • Cultural/Social
  • Religious Isolates
  • e.g., Amish, Hutterites, Ashkenazi Jews
  • Historic/Political/Ethnic
  • Utah Mormons, Native American, African-American

3
ELSI
  • Research Access
  • Consent Process
  • Group vs. Individual
  • Risk/Benefit Assessment
  • Reporting Constraints
  • Continuing Communication

4
Initial Study Design
  • How are Decisions Made?
  • Collectively or Individually?
  • In family or lineage groups?
  • Public or Private discussions?
  • What is culturally appropriate locus for decision
    making?
  • Is this relevant to IRB review?

5
Study Design
  • Myriad of social science research approaches
  • qualitative, quantitative,
    questionnaire, interview (oral history),
  • participant/observation (ethnography),
    experimental, deception, etc.
  • More heterogeneous than medical/clinical model
  • Multiple decision making and consent contexts
  • Review risk/benefit regs, or quality of science?

6
Community Negotiation
  • Permission to Collect Data
  • Scope of Project
  • Options for Population Identification
  • Name community, ethnic group/affiliation,
    geographic location/region, anonymity
  • Fate of analyzed data/samples
  • Archival data, future research, data sharing,
    collaborations
  • Intellectual Property Issues

7
BIOPIRACY
8
BIOWEAPONS
  • Genuine fear of continuing? Genocide
  • Often based on historical precedent e.g.,
    Tuskegee Study
  • Fueled by popular press -
  • Gene Research is Leading to Biological Weapons
    that Target Specific Ethnic Groups
  • SLC Tribune headline - 2002

9
Informed Consent
  • What are consent boundaries?
  • e.g., Anonymity, Voluntary withdrawal
  • How to inform participants (e.g., genetic
    research) if basic knowledge of scientific method
    is limited?
  • Risks
  • Personal, Cultural, Ethnic Identities,
    Financial considerations
  • Individual Informed Consent
  • Not entirely adequate in contexts of collective
    decision making

10
Informed Consent
  • What are consent boundaries?
  • e.g., Anonymity, Voluntary withdrawal
  • How to inform participants (e.g., genetic
    research) if basic knowledge of scientific method
    is limited?
  • Risks
  • Personal, Cultural, Ethnic Identities,
    Financial considerations
  • Individual Informed Consent
  • Not entirely adequate in contexts of collective
    decision making

11
KNOW LOCAL KNOWLEDGE
12
Norwegian Survey
  • Q What is a gene?
  • Courtesy of Andrew Luca

13
Norwegian Survey
  • Q What is a gene?
  • A What Americans put in tomatoes.
  • Courtesy of Andrew Luca

14
Informed Consent
  • What are consent boundaries?
  • e.g., Anonymity, Voluntary withdrawal
  • How to inform participants re genetic research if
    basic knowledge of scientific method is limited?
  • Risks
  • Personal, Cultural, Ethnic Identities,
    Financial considerations
  • Individual Informed Consent
  • Not entirely adequate in contexts of collective
    decision making

15
Risk to Cultural/Ethnic Identity
  • Two Case Studies
  • Aleut Origins
  • African-American Ethnic Identity

16
Personal ID Risk
  • Population Genetics of Garifuna
  • Multidisciplinary biomedical and cultural
    research project.
  • Very high participation rate, but large numbers
    declined to sign consent form or permit
    collection of dermatoglyphics

17
Why?
  • 10-25 of adult men, and some women, in any
    given community occasionally, or routinely, lived
    and worked illegally in the New York City garment
    industry to support their families.
  • Legitimate concern with confidentiality and
    personal identification -
  • fingerprints and personal signature

18
Informed Consent
  • What are consent boundaries?
  • e.g., Anonymity, Voluntary withdrawal
  • How to inform participants re genetic research if
    basic knowledge of scientific method is limited?
  • Risks
  • Personal, Cultural, Ethnic Identities,
    Financial considerations
  • Individual Informed Consent
  • Not entirely, or completely, adequate in contexts
    of collective decision making

19
Group Consent
  • Who speaks for the group?
  • Community/political leaders? Elders? Religious
    leaders?
  • Who identifies group spokespersons?
  • Potential to change community power structure,
    and affect sampling strategy
  • What is relation between group consent and
    informed or voluntary individual consent?
  • Group consent includes non-participants
  • Anonymity

20
Anonymity
  • When is anonymity guaranteed?
  • What is anonymized?
  • Individual ID? Group ID?
  • How does anonymity relate to group consent?
  • Anonymity can compromise voluntary withdrawal

21
Consultation Consent
  • Multiple successful models
  • Context, population/community, specific
  • ONE SIZE DOES NOT FIT ALL

22
Take Home Message
  • Research (including consent) is a process, not a
    signature.
  • PI is usually most knowledgeable about how that
    process will work in specific contexts.
  • Risk is not a simple, uniform construct. It is
    perceived differently in different places.
  • For minimal risk studies, focus on risk/benefit
    ratio and consent process rather than scientific
    merit.
  • Be thorough, thoughtful, and flexible

23
GOCADAN
  • Collaboration between Norton Sound Health
    Corporation MedStar Research Institute
  • NSHC and local community input in design stage
  • NSHC and Alaska Native representation on initial
    IRB evaluation (continuing RERB)
  • Local decision making style is community consensus

24
GOCADAN - cont.
  • Continued local involvement in data collection
  • Local repository for collected samples
  • Regular, personal report of individual results to
    participants
  • Participation rate for 8 communities gt80

25
Nuvuk - Pt. Barrow, AK
  • 1 yr. discussion with local tribal and corp.
    authorities to rescue at risk cemetery
  • 6 mo. discussion prior to permission for aDNA
    analyses, 12 mo. for modern population genetic
    analysis
  • Written permissions for research obtained from
  • Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corp.
  • Barrow Senior Advisory (Elders) Council
  • Native Village of Barrow
  • (Inupiat Traditional Govt.)

Reconstruct long-term population history and
community origins
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com