Title: Effects of Cloud/rain on Ka band altimeter
1Effects of Cloud/rain on Ka band altimeter
- J. Tournadre et al
- Ifremer Brest
2OSTS Hobart, March 2007
- Altika altimeter in Ka band (see Noubel and
Verron presentations) - Better performances but one major problem at Ka
band (35.75 GHz) rain and cloud can strongly
attenuate the signal and distort the echo
waveform. - Important to quantify
- Impact on echo waveforms and geophysical
parameters estimate (use of MLE4 algo) - Percentage of data possibly lost due to rain
and/or clouds
3- Previous studies (Tournadre 1999). In presence of
rain larger than 1-2 mm/hr the distortion of the
waveform will inhibit the geophysical parameter
retrieval. - At Ka band the attenuation by cloud droplet is
about 1.1 dB/km par g/m3 (10 time larger than Ku
band), not negligible. Cloud at Ka rain at Ku . - Cloud more frequent than rain. Necessity to
analyze in detail the effect of cloud on the
signal - Waveform modeling in presence of cloud
- Estimation of attenuation, off-nadir angle,
leading edge slope at 1Hz and 20 Hz as a function
of cloud parameters (IWC, height, diameter,..) - Estimation of the impact of cloud on the
geophysical parameters (ssh,s0, SWH) retrieval
waveform modeling and MLE4 (Stenou et al).
Determination of data availibility - Rain/cloud flag definition based on the signal
analysis (Altika is single-frequency)
4Waveform modeling
- Analytical model of waveform based on Brown model
an attenuation term - A attenuation by cloud or rain
- k attenuation coefficient in dB/km
-
rain -
cloud - R rain rate, mv liquid water content (g/m3)
5- For clouds
- Attenuation depends on Integratedd cloud liquid
water (ICLW) - Simpler than the rain case
6Cloud liquid water
Typical values for the properties of clouds. The
values are merely modal-means. The range of
observed values is quite large. The radius of
cloud droplets is r (microns), the effective
optical radius optically is r', N is the number
of droplets per cubic centimetre, L is the liquid
water content of the cloud (g/m3). For all
clouds, the level of observation is just below
the freezing level, except for fog and cirrus.
(Hess et al 1998)
7Cloud water droplet and ice cristalsIce has a
much lower attenuation coefficient and can be
neglected in the computation.
8Cloud at a given time!!
9Cloud liquid water content data
- Several satellite sensors gives estimates of the
integrated cloud liquid water content such as
SSM/I, AIRS or MODIS on Aqua/Terra. - However to have a good modeling we need high
resolution data.
10Waveform distortion by rain and cloud
- Ka band strong attenuation by rain and cloud
- But more important
- strong distortions of the waveform shape
modification of leading edge and plateau slope
0.1
1
10
Return power
Attenuation
Altika WF over a 10 km 2.5 mm/hr rain cell
11Altika unavailability by rain Use of JASON
ENVISAT,TOPEX rain climatology same sampling as
Altika Probability of rain greater than 1-1.5
mm/hr
12(No Transcript)
13Waveform modeling cloud with gaussian
distribution of ICLW
- ICLW.
- Cloud radius
- Distance nadir/cloud
- Attenuation
- Off-nadir angle
Stronger distortion for small high ICLW cloud
14Comparison 1Hz 20Hz
Small difference on attenuation for cloud radius
larger than the footprint (8km) For ICLW
lt0.5kg.m² weak impact of cloud (attlt1 dB zlt0.01²)
15Quantification of the impact of cloud on
geophysical parameter see Desjonquéres
Presentation
- Other approach definition of a rain and cloud
flag - Altika single frequency altimeter implies a
definition of a flag based on the analysis of the
signal itself (sigma0 and or waveform). - Critical for light to very light rain and cloud
with high water content. - Radiometer liquid water estimate are not
sufficient for cloud/rain flagging (see past
experience with Topex and Jason) - Flag based on sigma0 and off-nadir angle estimate
variations. - Test on modeled waveform using satellite cloud
liquid water measurements.
16Analysis of s0 and z² variations within a cloud.
Nuage à IWC constant
Nuage IWC exponentiel
High small scale highly correlated variations of
s0 et z
17Modeled waveforms using (10 km resolution 10 km)
AIRS liquid water data from AIRS on AQUA
18- Detection of s0 et z² variations
- Method Wavelet decomposition (here symmlet 8)
of s0 et z - Use matching pursuit algorithm (Mallat et al,
1997) - Determination of the most significant wavelet
from an energy point of view (named atoms) - Each event is characterized by its amplitude and
scale (possibility to discriminate by scales)
19- Exemple AIRS modeled waveforms
- White noise added to attenuation and z
Reconstructedd signal from atoms
20Synthesis
- IWC
- Attenation
- Off_nadir
- attenuation atoms
- O z atoms
21MODIS05 (1km)
22- IWC
- Attenation
- Off_nadir
- attenuation atoms
- O z atoms
23- Deformation can be important even for low IWC
(0.2kg/m²) - For IWC gt0.6 kg/m2 rain most probable
- Below 0.2 kg/m² few data will be contaminated
- Distortion depends more strongly n the
variability of IWC within the footprint than mean
value
24To be done Availability maps Test of the
feasibility of an operational rain/cloud flag
based on s0 and z variations
- Modis06 level3 daily products clouds.
- Cloud fraction, cloud liquid water histograms
25Conclusion
- Model shows that the mean impact of cloud is weak
for CLWC lower than 0.2 kg/m² - For higher CLWC it will be necessary to flag the
data - Wavelet analysis of the sigma0 and off-nadir
angle variations can be used to flag the data
affected by rain and clouds..
26Problem Definition of a rain flag
- As Altika certainly mono-frequency the rain flag
can not be similar to the JASON or ENVISAT one
(dual frequency). - Critical for light to very light rain (lt1 mm/hr)
and some non-raining clouds where microwave
radiometer data can not be used for rain
detection - New rain flag to be defined modelisation show
that it can be based on variation of sigma0 and
off-nadir (plateau) angle
Example variation of off-nadir angle induced by
rain
Off_nadir as function of distance from rain cell
and rain cell diameter for 0.5 mm/hr
Off-nadir as a function of rain celle diameter