Title: Institutional
1Institutional Benchmarks
Leadership Retreat
October 30-31, 2006
2(No Transcript)
3The Destination
Washington State University will be one of the
nations premiere research universities with
emphasis on top quality undergraduate education.
4The Core Four
Goal Offer the Best Undergraduate Experience in
a Research University
Goal Nurture a World Class Environment for
Research, Scholarship, Graduate Education, the
Arts and Engagement
Goal Create an Environment of Trust and Respect
in All We Do
Goal Develop a Culture of Shared Commitment to
Quality in All of Our Activities
5Ten Benchmark Goals
1. Student Quality Performance
7. Graduate Programs
2. Undergraduate Enrollment
8. Funding
9. Development
3. Diversity Student
10. Athletics
4. Diversity Faculty/Staff
5. Faculty Compensation
6. Research, Scholarship and the Arts Success and
Faculty Performance
6Student Quality Performance
7WSU Benchmarking Goals
Improve the quality of the freshmen class using
an index that combines adjusted high school GPA
with SAT/ACT score so that average test scores
reach 1100 within three years and eventually
equal or exceed the peer average
Identify a measure of student progress and meet
or exceed the peer average
Improve retention and graduation rates to equal
the peer average
Continue to monitor professional and licensure
graduation rates
8Measures
9Average AIN For Entering WSU Freshmen 1998-2006
(Notes A new, state-wide formula for
calculating the admission index is implemented as
of fall 2005. Prior years were recalculated for
comparison purposes.)
10Average SAT Scores for Entering Freshmen
(Peer SAT scores are still 100 points higher than
WSU scores.)
11Undergraduate Progress Index, WSU Peers
Data source Consortium for Student Retention
Data Exchange (1999 cohort for graduation, 2004
cohort for 1 year retention) IPEDS (2004-05 UG
degrees to Fall 2005 UG enrollment). Does not
include Cornell and Purdue University.
12Six-Year Graduation Rates, WSU and Peer Average,
Cohorts 1990-2000
13Undergraduate Enrollment
14WSU Benchmarking Goals
Controlled growth if funded
15Measures
16First-Time Freshmen WSU-Pullman, 1990-2006
172005 enrollment of new freshmen was as planned
2,885. In 2006, Pullman enrolled 2,699 new
freshmen while Vancouver enrolled 157 new
freshmen.
18Annual Average FTE by Campus
Academic Years 1983-2006
19Annual Average FTE, Pullman Campus, Academic
Years 1983-2006
20Diversity Student
21WSU Benchmarking Goals
22Measures
23Percent of Minorities in Student Body WSU
Overall, 1997-2006
24Percent of Minorities in Student Body Pullman,
1997-2006
25Diversity Faculty/Staff
26WSU Benchmarking Goals
Increase diversity of faculty/staff by 10 to 20
percent over the next three years
27Measures
28Instructional Faculty, Percent Women Pullman
1997-2006
29All Employees, Percent Women Pullman 1997-2006
(graduate students not included)
30Staff, Percent Minority, Pullman 1997-2006
31All Employees, Percent Minority Pullman 1997-2006
(graduate students not included)
32Instructional Faculty by Minority Status, Pullman
1997-2006
33Staff by Minority Status, Pullman 1997-2006
34Percent of Minority Staff
All WSU Work Locations, 1997-2006
35Faculty Compensation
36WSU Benchmarking Goals
Enhance competitive salary level reach first
the peer average and then the peer 75th
percentile and reach 40 percent full professor
over next five years
37Measures
38Instructional Faculty Salaries, Top 3 Ranks WSU
Average, Peer Average and Peer 75th Percentile
1996 -2005
39Instructional Faculty Salaries, Top 3 Ranks,
2004-2005
Fall 2004
Fall 2005
Change
WSU Average
68,365
72,702
6.3
Peer Average
80,297
83,076
3.5
40Average Salary, Top 3 Ranks
WSU and Peers, Fall 2005
FY2006 75th Percentile 86,822 FY2006 Gap to
75th 14,119 19.4 FY2006 Peer
Average 83,076 FY2006 Gap to
Average 10,373 14.3
41Full Professors as Percent of Faculty WSU and
Peers, 1996-2005
42Research, Scholarship, and the Arts Success and
Faculty Performance
43WSU Benchmarking Goals
Reach peer average (controlled for medical
schools) for research dollars per faculty member,
and reach peer 75th percentile for number of
citations per article
44Measures
45Total Research Expenditures Per Faculty as
Reported to NSF, WSU and Peer Averages
FY 1996-2005
46Federal Research Expenditures Per Faculty as
Reported to NSF, WSU and Peer Average
FY 1998-2005
47Grant Contract Revenue per Tenure Track Faculty
WSU and Peer Average, 1996-2005
48Sponsored Programs Fiscal Year Comparison of
Expenditures (millions of dollars)
69
64
61
52
44
22
23
23
21
20
20
19
19
18
16
16
16
16
16
14
49National Academy Members Per 1000 Faculty WSU and
Peers, FY 2000-2004
50Citation Impact, WSU and Peer Median and 75th
Percentile, Overlapping Five-Year Periods
1985-2005
51Graduate Programs
52WSU Benchmarking Goals
53Measures
54Doctoral Degrees Granted Since 1986
55Percent Graduate Students 1997-2006
56Graduate Enrollment as Percent of Total
Enrollment WSU and Peers, 2005
57Doctoral Degrees Overall and for Science
Engineering, 1990-2006
58WSU Professional Degrees,1990-2006
59Funding
60WSU Benchmarking Goals
8. Funding
61Measures
62WSU and Peer Average Percent Change in State
Appropriations Per Student, in Constant Dollars,
1993-2005
(2006- 2007 estimated with limited enrollment
growth)
63Tuition and Fee Revenue Per Student WSU and Peer
Average, 1996-2005
(2006- 2007 estimated)
64Total Educational Expenditures Per Student WSU
and Peers, FY 1996-2005
65Tuition Rates (Resident Undergraduate) WSU and
Peer Average, FY 1997-2007
66Development
67WSU Benchmarking Goals
68Measures
69Private Giving, WSU and Peer Average
1990-2005 (Thousands of Dollars)
70Giving for 2006 will be between 58 and 60
million. This will be a record year.
71WSU Endowment Growth FY 1980-2005 Millions of
Dollars
72Athletics
73WSU Benchmarking Goals
Maintain balanced budget while funding
competitive programs maintain/improve student
quality increase ticket sales and revenue
overall remain competitive in PAC-10 and
nationally in major sports
74Measures
75PAC-10 Six-Year Graduation Rates, Scholarship
Athletes and All Students, 1998 Cohort
76Funding Sources for WSU Athletics
77Still working to establish targets for
international emphasis
78How Did We Do?
Benchmark
2001-2006
2004-2006
- Student Quality Performance
- Undergraduate Enrollment
- Diversity Student
- Diversity Faculty/Staff
- Faculty Compensation
A
A
A-
B-
C
B
C
C
B-
A-
79How Did We Do?
Benchmark
2001-2006
2004-2006
6. Research, Scholarship and the Arts Success
Faculty Performance 7. Graduate Programs 8.
Funding 9. Development 10. Athletics
A
A-
C
C
C
A-
B-
A-
A-
B
80How Did We Do?
Other Activities
2001-2006
2004-2006
- University System
- University Government Relations
- Physical Facilities
A
A
A
A-
A
A
81Institutional Benchmarks
Leadership Retreat
October 30-31, 2006