Does Private Equity Create Wealth - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Does Private Equity Create Wealth

Description:

Buy up publicly held stock to concentrate firm ownership in a few large shareholders ... Conglomerate: Flooring, shipbuilding & auto parts. Pre-LBO debt level: $125 MM ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: ValuedGate333
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Does Private Equity Create Wealth


1
Does Private Equity Create Wealth?
  • Ron Masulis
  • Owen Grad School of Management, Vanderbilt
    University
  • Randall Thomas
  • Vanderbilt Law School

2
Three Themes
  • How private equity creates wealth
  • Why publicly owned firms are not managed well
  • How derivatives can destroy wealth
  • (Derivatives are put call options, futures
    contracts, swaps swaptions)

3
Overall LBO Volume as a Percentage of Global MA
Private Equity Deals
LBO Volume ( in billions)
Notes Includes announced transactions excluding
withdrawn deals, share repurchases, spin-offs,
and minority stake purchases.
Source Thomson
4
Basic Steps in an LBO
  • Buy up publicly held stock to concentrate firm
    ownership in a few large shareholders
  • Issue new debt to raise leverage and finance
    stock purchases
  • Streamline operations and sell off excess assets
    to pay back debt and high interest
  • An LBO is similar to an acquisition by a
    financial Bidder Bidder with cash but no
    operating assets

5
Do LBOs Create Wealth? EXAMPLE CONGOLEUMS LBO
  • Conglomerate Flooring, shipbuilding auto parts
  • Pre-LBO debt level 125 MM
  • Pre-LBO announcement equity value 150 MM
  • Buyout premium paid on stock 460 MM
  • Buyout financed with 380 MM in debt and 95 MM
    in excess cash
  • 5 years later paid off debt, did 2nd LBO
  • 2 years later firm liquidates - equityholders
    receive 850 MM

6
Stakeholder Winners Losers
  • Management
  • Stockholders
  • Bondholders 0
  • LBO investors (Private Equity)
  • Employees Pensioners -
  • Suppliers
  • IRS
  • LBO is not a zero sum game there is large
    wealth creation!

7
Stakeholder Wealth Effects - Evidence
  • Public stockholders 56 Buyout premium
  • Management
  • Realizes greater gains than common stockholders
  • Forced to invest substantial portion of wealth in
    stock bears large undiversified risk
  • Buyout funds Returns have ranged from 20 to 35
  • Thomas Lee had 50 for over 10 years
  • Straight debt
  • Bond ratings fall, but prices on average dont
    change
  • If LBO protected, then either debt repurchased at
    face value or interest rate is raised these
    bonds generally gain in value
  • If unprotected, bonds lose 7 of value on average
  • Employees Often head count is rapidly reduced by
    substantial amount
  • Suppliers usually must reduce their profits from
    sales to LBO firm
  • US Government Losses substantial taxes

8
How Do LBOs Create So Much Wealth?
  • Concentrates stock ownership
  • Shifts board control to large shareholder LBO
    investor
  • Accepts substantially higher debt leverage
  • Small number of private debt investors
  • Improves management incentives
  • Pressures mgmt to reduce the corporate empire.
  • Forces stakeholders to make large concessions
  • Increases tax savings

9
LBOs Improved Corporate Governance!
  • What do nearly all of the changes in the prior
    slide have in common?
  • They improved corporate governance!
  • Create strong incentives for CEO and Board to
  • Work hard
  • Take risks
  • Make tough decisions to improve shareholder wealth

10
LBOs Greatly Improved Management Incentives
  • Raises mgmt share ownership substantially
  • Substantial upside gain potential
  • Raises mgmt dollar investment in firm share
  • Substantial downside risk exposure
  • High leverage makes firms stock price highly
    sensitive to changes in firm value (equity
    multiplier effect)
  • Board oversight of mgmt is heightened by
    restructuring board of directors these
    directors have strong incentives
  • Small board, financially sophisticated, large
    stockholdings
  • Reduction in free cash flows
  • Substantial risk of bankruptcy in early years

11
Empirical Evidence on LBOsImproved Operating
Efficiency
  • Board composition substantially changes its
    size is reduced, and mgmt is often replaced
    within 1st 3 years
  • LBO firms become almost twice as profitable as
    industry competitors while privately held
  • LBO firms outperform competitors in operating
    income stock returns for at least 4 years
    following going public again
  • LBO firms show improved focus, sheds excess
    assets
  • Tax payments are reduced substantially
  • Compared to competitors, LBO firms
  • Use only half the working capital (cash)
  • Have larger average advertising budget
  • Overall investment level is lowered
  • RD maintenance expenses are unchanged!
  • Leverage is permanently higher even after a
    reverse LBO

12
Whats Wrong at Publicly Held Companies?
  • Poor corporate governance poor management
    incentives to operate the firm efficiently
  • Major corporate governance mechanisms
  • Board of directors Has power to hire, fire and
    set CEO compensation
  • CEO compensations sensitivity to firm
    performance
  • CEO and Board stockholdings

13
Public Company Board Structures Need to be
Strengthen
  • Directors of public companies are generally part
    time, not financial experts, have small
    percentage shareholdings with little incentive or
    expertise to effectively monitor risk exposure
  • Firms today are more complex and larger, making
    risk monitoring more difficult
  • Boards do a poor job of monitoring derivative
    risk exposure in separate analysis we examine
    corporate losses from derivatives and subprime
    problems strikingly large number of firms have
    experienced problems

14
Whats Wrong with Corporate Governance at Public
Companies?
  • Board of Directors are often nominated by the CEO
    (friends family)
  • Board has poor incentives to work hard (little
    stock in the firm)
  • Directors often not very financially
    sophisticated
  • Directors are often very busy not carefully
    monitoring
  • Outside directors dont know whats happening
    inside firm rely on CEO supplied information

15
Whats Wrong with Corporate Governance at Public
Companies?
  • CEO incentives are insensitive to firm
    performance
  • CEOs benefit from growing the empire even if
    it is not profitable
  • CEOs typically own little stock
  • CEOs often hold large option positions short
    term focus
  • CEOs may be protected from hostile takeover

16
The Rise of Derivative Contracts
  • Over the last 40 years, derivative contracts have
    emerged as a major financial instrument heavily
    traded, issued and held by corporations worldwide
  • Ex. Swaps contracts outstanding exceeded 100
    trillion
  • FIs in particular have been extremely active
    market participants
  • Derivatives allow investors to shift particular
    risks to other investors

17
Dangers of Derivatives
  • Derivatives allow a firm to dramatically increase
    risk exposure in a few minutes
  • Ex. Southwest Airlines buys most of its oil in
    the forward market commits to a price today for
    delivery months into the future
  • When oil prices were rising, they save millions
  • When oil prices began failing substantially, they
    lost millions
  • Metallgesellschaft lost 1.4 billion in oil
    futures
  • Sumitomo lost 2.6 billion in copper futures
  • Worldcom illegally reduced its costs using swap
    contracts by 11 billion

18
How Derivatives Make Corporate Governance Worse
  • Derivative contracts allow corporations to
    rapidly add or subtract specific risks
  • Financial accounting systems fail to reflect the
    risk exposures associated with these contracts
  • As derivative activity has risen, it becomes more
    difficult for boards of directors and investors
    to know what risks the firm has taken on
  • This allows CEOs to accept large risk exposures
    without board approval

19
FIs Have Serious Problems With Derivative Risk
Exposure
  • FIs are very big buyers and sellers of
    derivatives
  • Quarterly disclosure requirements for FIs are
    outdated and can be evaded
  • Rapid changes in counterparty risk are possible
    in large transactions, which requires more timely
    disclosure
  • Hard to evaluate FI risk levels because of
    complexity of transactions, especially
    counter-party default risk
  • Moral hazard problem from government bailouts
  • Little shareholder oversight because of dispersed
    ownership of FIs generally

20
Why Private Equity Improves Corporate Governance
  • PE investors have large shareholdings in their
    firms
  • Hire a small group of financially sophisticated
    directors with substantial firm shareholdings
  • Enforce strong board oversight of CEOs
  • Implement specialized internal reports
  • Have high leverage, which creates an large equity
    wealth multiple
  • Require senior management to hold substantial
    equity positions

21
Conclusions
  • Extensive derivative usage confronts boards and
    regulators with difficult monitoring problems
  • Public company boards lack the incentives, time,
    training and information to adequately monitor
    firms derivative exposure
  • Private equity firms help to offset these
    governance problems by exercising strong control
    rights, decreasing board size, improving
    information flows, introducing improved risk
    management, employing financially sophisticated
    directors with strong incentives, and giving
    management greatly improved incentives
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com