Title: Water Distribution Optimization: Taking SCADA One Step Forward: A Case Study
1Water Distribution Optimization Taking SCADA One
Step Forward A Case Study
Chuck Weber - WaterOne Simon Bunn Derceto Inc
21950s 1970s Control room
3PLC and RTU provide local control
41970s Mixed auto/manual systems
51980s SCADA systems appear
61990s Historical Databases arrive
71990-2000 Smart Instruments arrive
8- WaterOne is a quasi-municipal agency that
provides water to more than 400,000 individuals - WaterOne serves residential and commercial
accounts in 16 cities in the Johnson County area.
WaterOne serves approximately 135,000 customers. - WaterOne has nearly 3,000 miles of transmission
and distribution mains, equal to the distance
from Kansas City to Seattle. - WaterOne's service area covers more than 270
square miles. - WaterOnes current treatment capacity is 180
millions gallons per day.
9(No Transcript)
10Modern UCOS Scada System
- Single control room for treatment and
distribution - Installed in 1991, upgraded 2006
11What next after Scada?
12Decision Support Systems
13What to optimize?
- Energy cost minimization is a good target, as it
is one of the highest costs in producing the
next gallon of water. - "The more than 60,000 water systems and 15,000
wastewater systems in the United States are among
the countrys largest energy consumers, using
about 75 billion kWh/yr nationally 3 percent of
annual U.S. electricity consumption."Electric
Power Research Institute, Energy Audit Manual
for Water/Wastewater Facilities, (Palo Alto
1999), Executive Summary.
14Electricity Use by WaterOne
15Energy and Demand Charges
- Pricing is based on two components, energy use in
kWh and demand in kW
- Car Analogy for kWh and kW
- kW is like the speed that is measured by a
speedometer - kWh is the distance measured by the odometer
16Electricity Supply tariffs
- Kansas City Power Light (KCPL)
- Flat kWh tariff applies 24 hours day, 365 days
year - Flat demand charge, 24 hours a day, 365 days year
- Kansas City Board of Public Utilities (KCBPU)
- Flat kWh tariff applies 24 hours day, 365 days
year - Demand charge only applies 10 hours/weekday with
monthly peak and 70 of highest summer peak
setting winter charge (effectively a 12 month
ratchet clause) - Almost no incentive at all for shifting
electrical load - No options for time-of-use or real-time pricing
- Last KCPL tariff structure changes were made10
years ago - Market is unlikely to change or deregulate in the
mid term
17Solving the energy equations
- Numerically impossible to solve, but the
following techniques have been attempted - Localized optimization at each pump station using
profiling or time triggers - Expert Systems using cascading rules
- Advanced techniques using Genetic Algorithms
- Multi-Objective Polynomial Systems (MOPS)
- Dynamic Programming with Stochastic analysis
- All still make considerable assumptions and do
not achieve optimality - A 2001 AWWA report said the market is waiting
for an off-the-shelf solution
18A New Customized-Off-The-Shelf tool
- Over the last 4 years, Derceto Aquadapt has
implemented energy cost optimization systems with
leading US water utilities - Five key cost reduction techniques were employed
- Electrical load shifting in time, to maximize
utilisation of low cost kWh tariff blocks
(time-of-use tariffs) - Peak electricity kW demand reduction
- Energy efficiency improvements from pumps and
pumping plants. - Utilization of lowest production and chemical
cost sources of water. - Utilization of shortest path between source and
destination - WaterOne benefited primarily from peak demand
reduction and lowest cost source selection
19Key Energy Management Modules
WaterOne UCOS SCADA System
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22Project Timeline
- Feasibility Study - June 2004 to August 2004
- Detailed Design - September 2004 to April 2005
- Configuration and Testing - July 2005 to Mar 2006
- Delivery, Implementation and Site Testing -
April/May 2006 - Had to be ready in time for peak summer demand
otherwise majority of savings would be lost for
2006/07 - WaterOne created and maintained an audit tool to
measure savings on a monthly basis. This is a
sophisticated analysis tool - Uses formulation of kW versus MGD from four
previous years - Created non-linear functions to calculate kW at
each major point - Allowed for changes in tariff in future years to
be incorporated - Maintenance, Enhancement and Support contract
started in June 2006 with latest Aquadapt version
5.5 rolled out in 2008
23Peak Demand Reductions
5 MW Reduction
24Even after a major Pipe-break
25Results to date Electricity savings
- First month of operation May 2006, saved 90,000
- First year of operation May 06 to April 07 saved
565,000 - First six months of 2007/08 saved 553,000
- Total of 1,118,000 saved in 18 months of
operation - Reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 4800
tons/year - Other impacts
- Has required changes in operation, but no
additional hardware or instrumentation was
required - Operators were involved all the way through the
process and had valid concerns which needed to be
addressed - Ongoing program of training and product
enhancement is helping culture change and
acceptance - Aquadapt is now being used to identify areas
where further savings can be made
26(No Transcript)
27(No Transcript)
28(No Transcript)
29Conclusions
- The considerable investment in a Scada system is
often hard to justify financially, but it is an
essential tool - Utilization of the data and interfaces presented
by a Scada system in areas such as planning and
operations optimization can provide additional
financial benefits - Even in an energy market that looked unfriendly
to energy optimization, significant benefits were
achieved - Buying advanced software off-the-shelf reduces
risk - Use robust systems to measure the benefits to
avoid doubt - Operators need to be involved from start to
finish, they know the treatment and distribution
systems best - This is just one step in the path to operations
optimization, keep an eye on costs and benefits
in all areas to best serve your customers
30Questions?