Auraria 2'0 and the Role of Federated Searching - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Auraria 2'0 and the Role of Federated Searching

Description:

What do we want in a federated search product? ... Federated Search Products Evaluated. CSA's Multisearch. Webfeat's Express. Auto-Graphic's AGent ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: nmch
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Auraria 2'0 and the Role of Federated Searching


1
Auraria 2.0 and the Role of Federated Searching
  • Auraria Library Open Forum
  • 28 February 2007
  • Nina Still Here McHale

2
Agenda
  • Web 2.0
  • Library 2.0
  • Auraria 2.0, today
  • Auraria 2.0, tomorrow
  • Usability Test (Fall 2006) results
  • Role of Federated Searching
  • A 2.0 Home Page

3
What is Web 2.0?
  • Term coined by OReilly Media in 2004
  • Refers to a perceived or proposed second
    generation of Web-based servicessuch as social
    networking sites, wikis, communication tools, and
    folksonomiesthat emphasize online collaboration
    and sharing among users. (Wikipedia, emphasis
    added)
  • A bunch of hype?

4
What is Library 2.0?
  • Based on the concept of Web 2.0 term coined by
    Michael Casey (Gwinnett County, GA, Public
    Library)
  • Some characteristics (from Wikipedia Library
    2.0)
  • Harness the library user in both design and
    implementation of services.
  • Library users should be able to craft and modify
    library provided services.
  • Continue to examine and improve services and be
    willing to replace them at any time with newer
    and better services.
  • Rigidity breeds failure.
  • A bunch of hype?

5
What About Auraria is Already 2.0?
  • Our open source software web development
    environment (UNIX/Apache/MySQL/PHP)
  • Blogs Hot Topics, Research Behind the News,
    Institutional Repository Committee
  • Wikis WAC, Emerging Tech, Intranet Task Force,
    Institutional Repository Committee, planned for
    future intranet
  • Focusing on user feedback with usability testing

6
How can we take 2.0 farther?
  • Regular usability testing (each fall?)
  • Web site redesign
  • Federated searching

7
Usability Testing, Fall 2006 What Our Patrons
Want
  • Less on the home page
  • too much, its overwhelming
  • More visual cues, guidance, in where to start
  • one has to read really all the options and
    doesnt find an important option right away
  • Improved functionality the Google question
  • Google is faster, easier, friendlier
  • BUT, the library has great and credible
    writings if the ARE found.

8
The Role of Federated Searching
  • For our patrons
  • Google-izes the librarys web page
  • Connects users to reliable content
  • While not optimum for advanced searchers, will
    increase novice user usage
  • For the library
  • Return on investment Marist college example
  • 256 increase in Project Muse usage
  • 206 increase in Science Direct usage
  • 198 increase in JSTOR usage

9
What do we want in a federated search product?
  • Attractive user features (deduplicating results,
    print/email/save search results, compatibility
    with bibliographic tools, i.e., EndNote)
  • Compatibility with existing systems and tools
    (Skyline, GoldRush, etc.)
  • Affordable pricing
  • Easy-to-use administration module
  • A vendor-hosted service
  • CUSTOMIZATION and INTEGRATION into existing web
    page

10
Federated Search Products Evaluated
  • CSAs Multisearch
  • Webfeats Express
  • Auto-Graphics AGent
  • Innovatives Research Pro (formerly MetaFind)
  • Serials Solutions Central Search

11
CSAs Multisearch
12
WebFeat Express
  • Similar customization limitations as CSAs
    Multisearch
  • Does allow for a Google box on a web page
  • WebFeat Custom product allows for better
    customization/integration, but is prohibitively
    priced

13
Auto-Graphics AGent
14
Innovatives ResearchPro
  • Formerly MetaFind, which was being developed for
    III by a third party
  • Current release lacking in features that have
    been standard in others
  • Wariness of federated search products created by
    ILS vendors tacked on services

15
And the Winner Is
  • Serials Solutions Central Search
  • Most customizable user interface (Pitt example)
  • Unique new end-user feature clustering
  • Competitively priced
  • Satisfaction with other SS products

16
Integration into an Existing Site U of
Pittsburgh Library
17
Unique Feature Clustering
18
A Home Page 2.0 Possibility
19
Further Info About Library 2.0
  • Karen Coombs, Building a Library Web Site on the
    Pillars of Web 2.0, Computers in Libraries,
    January 2007 http//www.infotoday.com/cilmag/jan07
    /Coombs.shtml
  • Michael Sauers, Library 2.0 Free Friday Forum,
    December 2006 (Power Point Slides)
  • http//www.travelinlibrarian.info/presentations/S
    auers-Library2.0-2006.12.13.ppt

20
Links to Resources Mentioned
  • Sample Auraria blog and wiki
  • Research Behind the News blog http//aurariaresea
    rchnews.blogspot.com/
  • WAC wiki http//aurariawac.pbwiki.com/
  • Usability testing report
  • http//carbon.cudenver.edu/nmchale/usability/fina
    lreportfall2006.doc
  • Home page possibility wireframe
  • http//library.auraria.edu/index3.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com