What Influences Behavior of Physicians Toward Victims of Spouse Abuse? PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What Influences Behavior of Physicians Toward Victims of Spouse Abuse?


1
What Influences Behavior of Physicians Toward
Victims of Spouse Abuse?
  • Ramani Garimella, M.D., Ph.D. Stacey Plichta,
    Sc.D.Clare Houseman, Ph.D.
  • Laurel Garzon, D. N.Sc.

2
Objective
  • To explore the relationship between demographic
    characteristics, practice characteristics,
    training characteristics and behavior of
    physicians toward victims of spouse abuse.

3
Introduction
  • Non-identification of victims of spouse abuse by
    physicians and other health care providers may be
    largely responsible for missing the opportunity
    to help women when they do come in contact with
    the health center.

4
Problem Statement
  • Annually, more than 1.5 million women nation-wide
    seek medical treatment for injuries related to
    abuse.
  • Health care professionals are frequently the
    first or only professionals from whom spouse
    abuse victims seek help.
  • Health care system can be a crucial point for
    identification, treatment and secondary
    prevention of abuse.
  • Failing to diagnose and appropriately treat abuse
    may further the victims sense of entrapment and
    contribute to ongoing victimization.

5
Epidemiology
  • Each year an estimated 4 - 6 million women in the
    United States are physically abused by their
    current or former intimate partners.
  • Women are by far the most frequent victims of
    spouse abuse.
  • Spouse abuse follows no clear demographic pattern
    and is distributed across all countries and all
    religions.
  • No race or ethnic group is at a significantly
    greater risk.
  • Very few predisposing factors, other than age,
    socioeconomic class and a history of child sex
    abuse, have been identified.

6
Health Effects of Spouse Abuse
  • Physical Health
  • immediate effects
  • bruises, lacerations, especially to the central
    areas such as breasts and abdomen, and broken
    bones
  • long-term effects
  • chronic medical problems, particularly functional
    bowel disorders, chronic pain, and headaches
  • poorer gynecological health, higher rates of
    urinary tract infections and sexually transmitted
    diseases
  • effects on pregnancy
  • abuse is a significant factor in miscarriages and
    abortions

7
Health Effects of Spouse Abuse
  • Mental Health
  • immediate effects
  • fear, anxiety and confusion
  • shame, guilt and humiliation
  • long-term effects
  • sleep disturbances, mood disorders and
    personality disorders
  • increased risk of low self-esteem and being
    depressed
  • one of the most significant precipitants of
    female suicide

8
Utilization of Health Services
  • about 22 - 33 of women seeking care for any
    reason in emergency departments
  • up to 25 of women in ambulatory care internal
    medicine clinics
  • more than 50 of mothers of abused children
  • about 25 of women utilizing psychiatric
    emergency services
  • about 60 of women hospitalized in psychiatric
    facilities

9
Current State of Identification
  • despite the poorer health status and high
    utilization of health care services by victims of
    abuse, the vast majority of abused women are not
    detected by health care providers, even when the
    injury they presented with was directly due to
    abuse
  • without active screening, fewer than 10 of
    victims of abuse are identified in emergency rooms

10
Possible Barriers to Physician Identification
  • Lack of knowledge and training in identification
    and assisting victims of abuse may be responsible
    for non-identification of victims of abuse in the
    health settings
  • Negative attitudes held by physicians may also be
    a barrier

11
Method
  • Physicians from four different specialties in a
    local general hospital (n 76 RR 51) were
    surveyed to assess their knowledge and attitudes
    toward victims of spouse abuse.
  • Knowledge and attitudes were measured by a mail
    survey, physician survey on spouse abuse. This
    was adapted from the Health Care Provider Survey
    on Domestic Violence by the Group Health
    Cooperative of Puget Sound and Harborview Injury
    Prevention and Research Center.

12
Method (contd.)
  • A cross-sectional mail survey, using a modified
    Dillman technique was adopted for this survey.
  • Initial mail survey was followed by telephone
    follow-up. New surveys were faxed to providers
    who expressed interest. The responses were
    received over a period of 12 weeks.

13
Method-Measurement of Behavior
  • This survey had 55 closed-ended and one
    open-ended questions to measure attitude and
    knowledge and 14 items on background information.
  • Attitude was measured a composite of beliefs,
    feelings and behaviors.
  • Behavior was measured by three variables, verbal
    statements about behavior, frequency of
    suspecting abuse and number of victims identified
    in the past year (self-reported).

14
Sample Items of verbal statements of behavior
  • I dont have the time to ask about spouse abuse
    in my practice.
  • I am afraid of offending the patient if I ask
    about spouse abuse.
  • If I find a patient who is a victim, I dont know
    what to do.
  • I dont know how to ask about the possibility of
    spouse abuse.
  • (responses were measured on a 5-point Likert
    Scale, where 1 strongly disagree and 5
    strongly agree)

15
Suspecting a possibility of abuse
  • In the past three months, when seeing someone
    with the following condition how often have you
    asked the patient about the possibility of abuse
  • Injuries
  • Chronic pain
  • Irritable bowel syndrome
  • Headaches
  • Depression/anxiety
  • Hypertension/coronary heart disease
  • (responses were measured on 5-point scale where 1
    never and 5 always)

16
  • Number of victims identified in the past year was
    measured by a single question
  • How many victims of spouse abuse have you
    identified in the past year?
  • (responses 1 0 2 1-5 3 610 4 11-20 5
    gt20)

17
Description of the Sample
  • Demographic Characteristics
  • 72 male
  • mean age 44 years (82 gt 35 years of age)
  • 90 white
  • 88 married

18
Description of the Sample (Contd.)
  • Practice Characteristics
  • specialty (30 ER 24 FP 33 Ob-gyn 13 PM)
  • mean years in profession 15 (71 gt10 years in the
    profession)
  • 63 in private practice
  • Training Characteristics
  • 80 had little or no course content on spouse
    abuse in medical school
  • 81 had no CME training in spouse abuse

19
Results
  • Overall, more than 80 of the physicians scored
    positively on verbal statements of behavior
  • about 50 of the physicians identified five or
    less than five victims in the past year.
  • but only 22 scored positively on frequency of
    suspecting abuse.
  • Even when seeing a patient with injuries only 20
    always enquired about a possibility of abuse.

20
Results
  • Verbal statements of behavior were not
    significantly different by demographic or
    training characteristics.
  • Specialty was significantly related to verbal
    statements of behavior.
  • Psychiatrists were significantly more likely than
    family practitioners to make positive verbal
    statements of behavior.

21
Results
  • Younger physicians (lt35 years of age) were likely
    to identify greater number of victims of abuse
    than older physicians (3.20 vs. 2.59).
  • Family practitioners were significantly less
    likely to identify victims of spouse abuse than
    either emergency room physicians,
    obstetrician-gynecologists or psychiatrist (Fp-
    1.94 obgyn- 2.40 psy - 2.70 er - 3.65) .
  • Family practitioners also suspected abuse less
    frequently than other practitioners.
  • Positive verbal statements of behavior were also
    significantly correlated to frequency of
    suspecting abuse and higher number of victims
    identified in the past year.

22
Results
  • In the logistic regression model six independent
    variables (gender, age, graduate curriculum,
    training, and personally knowing a victim) were
    regressed on the dependent variable number of
    victims identified in the past year and specialty
    was the strongest predictor.
  • Family practitioners were .05 times (CI .01
    -.59) less likely to identify fewer than five
    victims of abuse in the past year.

23
Conclusions
  • Specialty seems to be the greatest predictor of
    behavior.
  • Family practitioners were less likely to identify
    or suspect abuse compared to other specialists.

24
Recommendations
  • More emphasis needs to be placed on training
    family practitioners in identifying victims of
    spouse abuse.
  • This is especially important in the growing
    managed care environment as family practitioners
    are most likely gate-keepers to women accessing
    health care.
  • It might be useful to teach spouse abuse using
    the public health three level intervention for
    chronic diseases.

25
Clearly violence against women is not merely a
health issue it is a social issue, a personal
issue, a legal issue, etc., and physicians are
solely not responsible for alleviating this
problem. However, the medical community, is an
important resource for women who are victims of
violence, and has the power to make an impact on
this problem. If efforts of medical, social
service, and legal agencies are coordinated to
recognize and support victims of violence, women
who are victimized will have more choices about
eliminating fear from their lives (Burge, 1989).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com