Title: Psychology of Music Learning
1Psychology of Music Learning
- Miksza Spring 09
- WEEK TWO-THREE
- Behaviorism
2Part I
- Classical Conditioning
- Assumptions
- Method
- Phenomena
- Counter conditioning
- Figures
- There is more detail in this section of the
outline than is presented in Driscoll its good
information but focus on Part II for the
purposes of this class
3Behaviorist Assumptions
- John Watson (Psychology as the Behaviorist Views
It, 1913) - Introduced the term Behaviorism
- Advocated for objective, scientific, observable
forms of inquiry - Equipotentiality
- Learning best studied through stimuli and
responses - Internal processes largely excluded (radical
perspective) - Learningchange in behavior
- Empiricist/blank slate
- Learning greatly effected by the environment
- Parsimony
4Classical Conditioning
- Ivan Pavlov (Conditioned Reflexes, 1927)
- Basic Form of 3 Steps
- Neutral stimulus No response
- Neutral stimulus/unconditioned stimulus paired
unconditioned response - Conditioned stimulus conditioned responses
- Signal learning
- Behavior Elicited not necessarily conscious
response
5Watsons take
- Law of frequency
- The more frequently a stimulus and response
occur in association with each other, the
stronger the S-R habit will become (Ormrod, p.
43). - Law of recency
- The response that has most recently occurred
after a particular stimulus is the response most
likely to be associated with that stimulus
(Ormrod, p. 43). - Extreme position regarding nature/nurture issues
6Classical Conditioning Phenomena
- Extinction
- Behavior goes away
- Spontaneous Recovery
- Behavior comes back
- Stimulus Generalization
- Response occurs when presented with similar
stimuli - Stimulus Discrimination
- When an individual learns not to generalize a
response to similar stimuli - Higher-order Conditioning
- Another layer of pairing stimuli and responses
7More Recent Developments in Classical Conditioning
- Contingency/contiguity vs. random or
coincidence-like pairing - Salience of the conditioned stimulus
- Some stimulus/response pairings make more sense
than others - Cognition a part of the process
- S/R relationships among mental representations
- Tolerance to drugs
8Altering Conditioned Behaviors
- Difficult to do involuntary
- Extinction
- Problems unpredictable speed, avoidance,
spontaneous recovery - Counter-conditioning (better than extinction)
- New response must be incompatible with old
response - Must identify a salient stimulus
- Gradually introduced new stimulus in conjunction
with old stimulus - Threshold method
- Present a stimulus faintly at first and then
gradually increase the strength - Systematic desensitization
- An example of counter-conditioning that is often
applied to anxiety problems - Exhaustion
- The stimulus is presented continuously until the
individual can no longer respond in a habitual
way
9Other key figures
- Edwin Guthrie
- A stimulus and response relationship can form at
full strength in just one trial - Clark Hull
- Intervening or organismic variables are also
important to consider - A departure from radical behaviorist views in
that internal elements were seen as important - Drive a major factor laid ground work for
early theories of motivation
10Part II
- Operant Conditioning
- Groundwork
- True theory
- Types of reinforcers
- Reinforcement vs. Punishment
- Conditions
- Phenomena
- Eliminating undesirable behavior
- Limitations of reinforcement
11Groundwork for Operant Conditioning
- Edward Thorndike
- Law of Effect
- Responses followed by satisfaction are
strengthened - Responses followed by discomfort are weakened
- Originally focused on rewards and punishments
- Later revised without emphasis on punishment
- Emphasized the importance of consequences in the
learning process
(Ormrod, p. 50)
12Operant Conditioning Proper
- B. F. Skinner
- Shifted emphasis from strength of S-R
connections to simply the strengthening of
responses - A flip-flop of S-R to R-S (or R-C)
- A response that is followed by a reinforcer is
strengthened and is therefore more likely to
occur again. - Reinforcer a stimulus or event that increases
the frequency of a response it follows (Ormrod,
p. 52). - Rather than elicit the focus is now on the
individual emitting a behavior, or operating
on their environment
13Types of Reinforcers
- Primary
- Those that satisfy an inherent biological need or
desire - Secondary/Conditioned
- Those that satisfy all other needs or desires
- Material
- Social
- Activity
- Intrinsic
14Positive/Negative Reinforcers vs. Punishment
- Reinforcer response increases
- Punishment response decreases
- Positive reinforcer present something positive
to increase certain response - Negative reinforcer take something away to
increase a certain response - Punishment present or take something away to
decrease a certain response - (see Driscoll, Figure 2.2, p. 37)
15Conditions for operant conditioning
- Reinforcer occurs after response
- Reinforcer comes immediately
- Reinforcer is contingent on the desired
response... - Magnitude and appeal of reinforcer affects
responses learned - Consistency of reinforcement is important
16Operant Conditioning Phenomena
- Baseline
- Behavior in absence of reinforcer
- Terminal behavior
- Desired response at end of reinforcement program
- Extinction
- When response is no longer followed by a
reinforcer and the behavior ceases - Superstition
- When reinforcement is random and not contingent
on behavior - Shaping
- Reinforcing successive approximations of a task
- Chaining
- Reinforcing one response at a time, and then a
sequence of responses simple to complex
behaviors
17Operant Conditioning Phenomena Continued
- Stimulus generalization
- Once a response/reinforcer connection is learned
an individual will likely respond similarly to
similar reinforcers - Stimulus discrimination
- When an individual learns under what
circumstances a response will or will not be
reinforced - Stimulus control
- Cueing/Prompting
- Verbal or non-verbal cues that indicate a desired
response (flicking lights, conducting, etc.) - Setting events
- Designing an environment that is conducive to the
type of response desired - Learned Helplessness
- The passive acceptance of events seemingly beyond
ones control
18Schedules of Reinforcement
- Ratio
- Reinforcements contingent on a certain number of
behaviors - Interval
- Reinforcement contingent on the passage of time
- Fixed
- Occurrence of reinforcement is consistent
- Variable
- Occurrence of reinforcement is not consistent
- (See Driscoll, Figure 2.5 and 2.6, p. 50 and 51)
19Eliminating Undesirable Behavior
- Extinguishing
- A particular response is no longer reinforced
- Non-contingent consequences
- May be beneficial for those who act out for
attention - Reinforcing other and/or incompatible behaviors
- Differential reinforcement
- Contingency contracts
- Personalized system of instruction
- IEPS and diverse learners
- CAI Computer Assisted Instruction
20Limitations of Reinforcement
- The reinforcer isnt salient
- Lack of consistency in reinforcement
- Cost/benefit analysis results in an imbalance
- Shaping a desired behavior too quickly
- Extrinsic reinforcer may undermine intrinsic
interest
21Basic educational implications related to
Behaviorist principles
- Practice
- Positive learning environment
- Methods for breaking bad habits
- Assessing learning by looking for behavioral
changes
22Part III
- Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA)
- Essential components
23ABA Assumptions and Pseudonyms
- Assumptions
- Behavioral issues are related to past and present
environmental circumstances - Operant Conditioning concepts
- Reinforcement, extinction, shaping, chaining,
stimulus control, reinforcing incompatible
behaviors, etc - ABaseline condition
- BTreatment/Intervention
- AReturn to Baseline
- Pseudonyms and similar processes
- Behavior Management
- Behavior modification
- Behavior therapy
- Contingency management...
24Components of ABA
- Present and desired behavior are specified in
observable, measurable terms (Driscoll step 1) - Behavior is measured before and during
intervention - Salient environmental/Intervention conditions
and/or reinforcers are identified (Driscoll step
2) - A specific intervention/treatment plan is
developed with the individual when appropriate
(Driscoll step 3) - Treatment monitored for effectiveness and
modified along if necessary (similar to Driscoll
step 4 and 5) - Efforts made to show how change in behavior can
be generalized to other situations - Treatment is phased out eventually