Lecture 13: The Individual Level Of Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Lecture 13: The Individual Level Of Analysis

Description:

Lecture 13: The Individual Level Of Analysis. 1. Rational Decision Making ... 2. Not Interested In 'Psycho-Biographies' 3. Motivated Bias: 'See What We Want To See' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: sscU8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lecture 13: The Individual Level Of Analysis


1
Lecture 13 The Individual Level Of Analysis
1. Rational Decision Making 2. Universal
Cognitive Biases 3. Cognitive Dissonance 4.
Motivated Bias
2
The Levels Of Analysis
1. SYSTEMIC LEVEL 2. INTER-STATE OR REGIME
LEVEL 3. DOMESTIC, STATE, OR SOCIETAL LEVEL 4.
BUREAUCRATIC LEVEL 5. INDIVIDUAL OR DECISION
MAKING LEVEL
3
Rational Decision Making Process
Define Problem
Search For Alternatives
Identify Consequences and Probabilities
Estimate Costs and Benefits
Optimize or Maximize
xxxxx
4
Theory Versus Practice
Problem Individuals Often Deviate From Model
Three Categories of Deviations
Universal Cognitive Biases
Cognitive Dissonance
Motivated Bias
5
Universal Cognitive Biases
1. Universal Implies All Humans Suffer From
Them 2. Cognitive Implies The Bias Influences
How We Absorb, Process, Store, And Recall
Information 3. Bias Implies A Deviation From
The Rational Model
6
Are People Rational?
Big Decisions
Little Decisions
  • Problems
  • 1) Too Much Information
  • 2) To Many Calculations
  • Solution Cognitive Shortcuts

7
Cognitive Biases
1. Satisficing -- Select Option Which Meets
Minimum Criteria 2. Historical Analogies Or
Lessons Of History -- Lesson Of Munich --
Country-Wide, Generational, Personal 3.
Availability Bias -- Example Israel Bombs
Iraqi Nuclear Reactor -- Vivid, Recent, Actual
Events, Consequential Events
Biases Often Interact
8
The Rational Model In Ideal Form
ALTERNATIVES ------------ POLICY A POLICY
B POLICY C POLICY D
CONSEQUENCES -------------------------------------
----- SUCCEED PROBABILITY (.5) X 100 FAIL
PROBABILITY (.5) X -50 SUCCEED PROBABILITY
(.5) X 90 FAIL PROBABILITY (.5) X -30 SUCCEED
PROBABILITY (.5) X 20 FAIL PROBABILITY (.5) X
-10 SUCCEED PROBABILITY (.5) X 200 FAIL
PROBABILITY (.5) X -100
EXPECTED COSTS ------------ (50-25)25 (45-15)3
0 (10-5)5 (100-50)50
9
Public Opinion The Persian Gulf War
gtgtgt
10
Cognitive Biases --Continued
4. See What You Expect To See -- Filter
Information Through Theoretic Framework 5.
Ignore Incoming Information -- Continually
Updating Belief System Is Impossible 6.
Fundamental Attribution Error -- Your Bad
Actions Dictated By Environment -- Opponents
Bad Actions Due To Character Flaws 7.
Selective Attention To Criteria or Goals
11
Cognitive Biases Conclusion
Alexander George
  • Shortcuts Are Not Always Bad
  • But We Tend to Have Favorites
  • And We Resort to Them Prematurely

12
Cognitive Dissonance
Accept Trade Off
Value Trade Off
Anxiety or Dissonance
Ignore Information
Manipulate Information
Examples Harassment, Dulles, and Nuclear Testing
13
The Nuclear Testing Debate
Issue Banning Of All Underground Nuclear Tests
Proponents of a Ban ---------- No
Impact Lots Reduces Reduces Many
Opponents of a Ban ---------- Undermines Little
Increases Increases None
Successful Deterrence Environmental
Damage Accidents Arms Races Alternatives
Available
Irrational Cognitive Consistency
14
Motivated Bias
1. Broad Category 2. Not Interested In
Psycho-Biographies 3. Motivated Bias See
What We Want To See 4. Example Stalin And The
Nazi Attack In 1941 5. Difficult, But Not
Impossible, To Separate Cognitive From
Motivated Bias
15
Conclusions
Do People Make Decisions Rationally? If Not, Do
Deviations Influence Foreign Policy?
  • Psychologists Find Many Deviations
  • Three Types (a) Universal Cognitive Biases
  • (b) Cognitive Dissonance
  • (c) Motivated Bias
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com