Title: Shower recognition algorithm
1Shower recognition algorithm For LCAL
LCAL-group K. Afanaciev, V. Drugakov, E.
Kouznetsova, W. Lohmann, A. Stahl
LUMI Workshop, Zeuthen November 14, 2002
2- Z - Segmentation
- Tungsten 3.5 mm
- Layer
- Diamond 0.5 mm
12 Radial Layers Square cells of about 0.5?0.5 cm
3GUINEAPIG BRAHMS ( for vs 500 GeV )
- Per bunch crossing
- 15000 e hits
- 20 TeV of total deposited energy
- (x,y)-distribution of the beamstrahlung energy
Background averaged for 500 bunch crossings
The bulk of energy is deposited in the inner
region (radial layers 1, 2 and 3)
4- Energy distribution
- in background
Total number of particles corresponds to 500
bunch crossings
Most particles have energy of up to few GeV A few
particles have energy greater than 50 GeV.
5- Energy deposition by 250 GeV e-
Total energy deposited by 250 GeV electron is
about 30 GeV
6- Average background for 10 bunchcrossings
- Longitudinal energy deposition profiles are a bit
different for particle and background - Distribution of energy deposition of BG defines
good and bad regions
250 GeV e- BG
7- Particle recognition
- algorithm
- 1. Calculate average background and its RMS
- 2. Subtract average BG from data
- 3. Compare result with 3sBG (RMS) (only for
long. layers 4 - 17) - 4. Find columns with gt 10 (of 14) such cells
- 5. Check neighbor columns to contain at least
7 suspected cells
8- Number of recognized particles with 2? and 3?
threshold - (100 real particles of 250 GeV)
9- Fake rate due to
- high energetic background
- Fake rate
- (BG of high energy BG fluctuations)
( 500 bunchcrossings )
10 11- Energy resolution vs radius
12- Calibration curve for different conditions.
- Though quite simple, this algorithm provides good
efficiency and energy resolution. - We should find a way to improve its performance
in bad regions.