ECO 3104 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

ECO 3104

Description:

Benefits and Cost of Buying a Car. S = value of transportation services in dollars ... Price of car is $20,000. Resale value of car is $4,000 in 6 years ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: tims61
Category:
Tags: eco

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ECO 3104


1
ECO 3104
  • Lecture 21

2
Valuing Costs and Benefits that Occur Over Time
  • Many decisions involve tradeoffs between present
    and future consumption
  • business investments in plant and equipment
  • government public works projects
  • investments by individuals in their human
    capital
  • consumer purchases of durable goods

3
Valuing Costs and Benefits that Occur Over Time
  • Need method for comparing present and future
    costs and benefits
  • must account for the fact that people prefer
    having things now rather than later
  • a dollar received tomorrow is not the same as a
    dollar received today
  • earlier availability gives individual more
    consumption choices
  • if have good today, can consume now or wait until
    future

4
Valuing Costs and Benefits that Occur Over Time
  • Marginal rate of time preference (MRTP)
  • extra future consumption you are willing to forgo
    to get additional consumption now, expressed as a
    percentage of the change in current consumption
  • MRTP (-?C1-?C0)/?C0
  • example ?C0 10, ?C1 -12
  • MRTP (12-10)/10 .2 20

5
Valuing Costs and Benefits that Occur Over Time
  • Interest rate
  • premium borrowers must pay lenders to obtain use
    of funds now
  • price of earlier availability, expressed in
    percentage terms
  • r (V1-V0)/V0

6
Valuing Costs and Benefits that Occur Over Time
  • Intertemporal exchange
  • if there are no transaction costs or other
    distortions (eg. taxes), individuals will make
    exchanges between present and future consumption
    (borrow and lend) until their MRTP equals the
    market interest rate
  • at the margin, market interest rate represents
    the tradeoffs each individual is willing to make
    between present and future consumption

7
Net Present Value
  • To compare alternative projects that include
    future benefits costs and benefits can find
    equivalent net value today or net present value

8
Net Present Value
  • PV of a single payment 1 year in the future

9
Net Present Value
  • PV of a single payment T years in the future
  • t2
  • in year 1, PV1V2/(1r)
  • in year 0, PV0 PV1/(1r)
  • V2/(1r)/(1r)
  • V2/(1r)2

10
Net Present Value
  • PV of a single payment T years in the future

11
Net Present Value
  • PV of a stream of annual payments for T years in
    the future
  • simply sum up PV of each payment

12
Net Present Value
  • If there are both future costs, C, and benefits,
    B, then net present value is

13
Net Present Value
  • Effect of time on NPV
  • the further in the future the benefit, the lower
    the net present value
  • Effect of interest rate on NPV
  • the higher the interest rate, the lower the net
    present value

14
PV of 1 Paid in the Future
Interest Rate 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5
Years 6 Years
  • 0.01 0.990 0.980 0.951 0.905 0.820 0.742
  • 0.02 0.980 0.961 0.906 0.820 0.673
    0.552
  • 0.03 0.971 0.943 0.863 0.744 0.554
    0.412
  • 0.04 0.962 0.925 0.822 0.676 0.456
    0.308
  • 0.05 0.952 0.907 0.784 0.614 0.377
    0.231
  • 0.06 0.943 0.890 0.747 0.558 0.312
    0.174

15
Net Present Value
  • Valuing Payment Streams
  • Choosing a payment stream depends upon the
    interest rate.

16
Two Payment Streams
Today 1 Year 2 Years
  • Payment Stream A 100 100 0
  • Payment Stream B 20 100 100
  • NPV of Stream A 100 100/(1r)
  • NPV of Stream B 20 100/(1r) 100/(1r)2

17
NPV of Payment Streams
r .05 r .10 r .15 r .20
  • NPV of Stream A 195.24 190.90 186.96 183.33
  • NPV of Stream B 205.94 193.54 182.57 172.77

Note that the NPV of A relative to B increases
as r increases since future payments are
discounted more heavily and stream Bs benefits
are weighted toward future periods
18
Adjustments for Risk
  • Determining the discount rate for an uncertain
    environment
  • This can be done by increasing the discount rate
    by adding a risk-premium to the risk-free rate.
  • Owners are risk averse, thus risky future cash
    flows are worth less than those that are certain.

19
Adjustments for Risk
  • Diversifiable versus non-diversifiable Risk
  • Diversifiable risk can be eliminated by investing
    in many projects or by holding the stocks of many
    companies.
  • Non-diversifiable risk cannot be eliminated and
    should be entered into the risk premium.

20
The Net Present Value Criterionfor Capital
Investment Decisions
  • Real versus nominal discount rates
  • Assume price, cost, and profits are in real terms
  • need to use real interest rate in calculations
  • real rate nominal rate expected inflation

21
The Net Present Value Criterionfor Capital
Investment Decisions
  • Real versus Nominal Discount Rates
  • If convert everything to nominal terms, get same
    result
  • Gains, costs and discount factor all increased by
    rate of inflation
  • NPV doesnt change
  • usually best to work in real terms, thereby
    avoiding necessity to estimate expected inflation

22
Investment Decisions by Consumers
  • Consumers face similar investment decisions when
    they purchase a durable good.
  • Compare future benefits with the current purchase
    cost
  • Examples
  • Cars
  • Appliances
  • TV sets and stereo equipment

23
Investment Decisions by Consumers
  • Benefits and Cost of Buying a Car
  • S value of transportation services in dollars
  • E total operating cost/yr
  • Price of car is 20,000
  • Resale value of car is 4,000 in 6 years

24
Investment Decisions by Consumers
  • Benefits and Cost

25
The Value of Lost Earnings
  • NPV can be used to determine the value of lost
    income from a disability or death.
  • Example
  • John Smith dies in an auto accident on January 1,
    2004 at 56 years of age.
  • computer programmer, salary 85,000

26
The Value of Lost Earnings
  • What is the PDV of Smiths lost income to his
    family?
  • Must adjust salary for predicted increase over
    time (g)
  • Assume a 1.5 real rate of growth in future
    earnings

27
The Value of Lost Earnings
  • What is the PDV of Smiths lost income to his
    family?
  • Must determine how much longer he would have
    worked
  • account for probability of death from other
    causes and retirement
  • can be determined from work life tables
  • 8 years

28
The Value of Lost Earnings
  • What is the PDV of Jennings lost income to his
    family?
  • need to determine real discount rate, r
  • r (nominal rate) - (expected inflation rate)
  • want nominal rate on government bonds of similar
    length
  • need to determine expected rate of inflation
    based on recent inflation rates calculated from
    the consumer price index

29
The Value of Lost Earnings

30
Calculating Lost Wages
Income Discount Factor Present Value Year W0(1
g)t 1/(1 r)t W0(1 g)t/(1 r)t
  • 2004 85,000 1.000 85,000
  • 2005 86,275 .976 84,171
  • 2006 87,569 .952 83,350
  • 2007 88,883 .929 82,536
  • 2008 90,216 .906 81,731
  • 2009 91,569 .884 80,934
  • 2010 92,943 .862 80,144
  • 2011 94,337 .841 79,362
  • Total 653,102

g0.015 r.025
31
The Value of Lost Earnings
  • Finding PDV
  • The summation of column 4 will give the PDV of
    lost wages (653,102)
  • The amount Jennings family could actually
    recover as compensation would also depend on
  • Taxes the Jennings would have paid on his salary
  • Fringe benefits they would have received (eg.
    health insurance)
  • Home production (eg. yard work, childcare) Mr.
    Jennings would have provided
  • Consumption by Mr. Jennings (food and clothing
    expenses if he would have lived)

32
Alternatives to NPV
  • Benefit-cost ratio
  • problem
  • will select projects with high relative net
    benefit, not necessarily greatest total net
    benefit

33
Alternatives to NPV
  • Internal rate of return (IRR)
  • IRR is the rate of return (r) such that PV of
    benefits equals the present value of costs
  • compute IRR and compare to market interest rate

34
Net Present Value of a Factory
10
8
6
4
Net Present Value ( millions)
2
0
-2
-4
-6
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Interest Rate, r
35
Alternatives to NPV
  • Internal rate of return (IRR)
  • problems
  • if negative cash flows at beginning and later in
    project can get multiple solutions

36
Alternatives to NPV
  • Internal rate of return (IRR)
  • problems
  • IRR gives discount rate at which net present
    value is zero, but at other discount rates the
    preferred project may be different

37
Net Present Value of a Factory
10
8

6
4
Net Present Value ( millions)
2
0
-2
-4
Project 1
Project 2
-6
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Interest Rate, R
38
End of Lecture 21
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com