Title: ECO 3104
1ECO 3104
2Valuing Costs and Benefits that Occur Over Time
- Many decisions involve tradeoffs between present
and future consumption - business investments in plant and equipment
- government public works projects
- investments by individuals in their human
capital - consumer purchases of durable goods
3Valuing Costs and Benefits that Occur Over Time
- Need method for comparing present and future
costs and benefits - must account for the fact that people prefer
having things now rather than later - a dollar received tomorrow is not the same as a
dollar received today - earlier availability gives individual more
consumption choices - if have good today, can consume now or wait until
future
4Valuing Costs and Benefits that Occur Over Time
- Marginal rate of time preference (MRTP)
- extra future consumption you are willing to forgo
to get additional consumption now, expressed as a
percentage of the change in current consumption - MRTP (-?C1-?C0)/?C0
- example ?C0 10, ?C1 -12
- MRTP (12-10)/10 .2 20
5Valuing Costs and Benefits that Occur Over Time
- Interest rate
- premium borrowers must pay lenders to obtain use
of funds now - price of earlier availability, expressed in
percentage terms - r (V1-V0)/V0
6Valuing Costs and Benefits that Occur Over Time
- Intertemporal exchange
- if there are no transaction costs or other
distortions (eg. taxes), individuals will make
exchanges between present and future consumption
(borrow and lend) until their MRTP equals the
market interest rate - at the margin, market interest rate represents
the tradeoffs each individual is willing to make
between present and future consumption
7Net Present Value
- To compare alternative projects that include
future benefits costs and benefits can find
equivalent net value today or net present value
8Net Present Value
- PV of a single payment 1 year in the future
9Net Present Value
- PV of a single payment T years in the future
- t2
- in year 1, PV1V2/(1r)
- in year 0, PV0 PV1/(1r)
- V2/(1r)/(1r)
- V2/(1r)2
10Net Present Value
- PV of a single payment T years in the future
11Net Present Value
- PV of a stream of annual payments for T years in
the future - simply sum up PV of each payment
12Net Present Value
- If there are both future costs, C, and benefits,
B, then net present value is
13Net Present Value
- Effect of time on NPV
- the further in the future the benefit, the lower
the net present value - Effect of interest rate on NPV
- the higher the interest rate, the lower the net
present value
14PV of 1 Paid in the Future
Interest Rate 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5
Years 6 Years
- 0.01 0.990 0.980 0.951 0.905 0.820 0.742
- 0.02 0.980 0.961 0.906 0.820 0.673
0.552 - 0.03 0.971 0.943 0.863 0.744 0.554
0.412 - 0.04 0.962 0.925 0.822 0.676 0.456
0.308 - 0.05 0.952 0.907 0.784 0.614 0.377
0.231 - 0.06 0.943 0.890 0.747 0.558 0.312
0.174
15Net Present Value
- Valuing Payment Streams
- Choosing a payment stream depends upon the
interest rate.
16Two Payment Streams
Today 1 Year 2 Years
- Payment Stream A 100 100 0
- Payment Stream B 20 100 100
- NPV of Stream A 100 100/(1r)
- NPV of Stream B 20 100/(1r) 100/(1r)2
17NPV of Payment Streams
r .05 r .10 r .15 r .20
- NPV of Stream A 195.24 190.90 186.96 183.33
- NPV of Stream B 205.94 193.54 182.57 172.77
Note that the NPV of A relative to B increases
as r increases since future payments are
discounted more heavily and stream Bs benefits
are weighted toward future periods
18Adjustments for Risk
- Determining the discount rate for an uncertain
environment - This can be done by increasing the discount rate
by adding a risk-premium to the risk-free rate. - Owners are risk averse, thus risky future cash
flows are worth less than those that are certain.
19Adjustments for Risk
- Diversifiable versus non-diversifiable Risk
- Diversifiable risk can be eliminated by investing
in many projects or by holding the stocks of many
companies. - Non-diversifiable risk cannot be eliminated and
should be entered into the risk premium.
20The Net Present Value Criterionfor Capital
Investment Decisions
- Real versus nominal discount rates
- Assume price, cost, and profits are in real terms
- need to use real interest rate in calculations
- real rate nominal rate expected inflation
21The Net Present Value Criterionfor Capital
Investment Decisions
- Real versus Nominal Discount Rates
- If convert everything to nominal terms, get same
result - Gains, costs and discount factor all increased by
rate of inflation - NPV doesnt change
- usually best to work in real terms, thereby
avoiding necessity to estimate expected inflation
22Investment Decisions by Consumers
- Consumers face similar investment decisions when
they purchase a durable good. - Compare future benefits with the current purchase
cost - Examples
- Cars
- Appliances
- TV sets and stereo equipment
23Investment Decisions by Consumers
- Benefits and Cost of Buying a Car
- S value of transportation services in dollars
- E total operating cost/yr
- Price of car is 20,000
- Resale value of car is 4,000 in 6 years
24Investment Decisions by Consumers
25The Value of Lost Earnings
- NPV can be used to determine the value of lost
income from a disability or death. - Example
- John Smith dies in an auto accident on January 1,
2004 at 56 years of age. - computer programmer, salary 85,000
26The Value of Lost Earnings
- What is the PDV of Smiths lost income to his
family? - Must adjust salary for predicted increase over
time (g) - Assume a 1.5 real rate of growth in future
earnings
27The Value of Lost Earnings
- What is the PDV of Smiths lost income to his
family? - Must determine how much longer he would have
worked - account for probability of death from other
causes and retirement - can be determined from work life tables
- 8 years
28The Value of Lost Earnings
- What is the PDV of Jennings lost income to his
family? - need to determine real discount rate, r
- r (nominal rate) - (expected inflation rate)
- want nominal rate on government bonds of similar
length - need to determine expected rate of inflation
based on recent inflation rates calculated from
the consumer price index
29The Value of Lost Earnings
30Calculating Lost Wages
Income Discount Factor Present Value Year W0(1
g)t 1/(1 r)t W0(1 g)t/(1 r)t
- 2004 85,000 1.000 85,000
- 2005 86,275 .976 84,171
- 2006 87,569 .952 83,350
- 2007 88,883 .929 82,536
- 2008 90,216 .906 81,731
- 2009 91,569 .884 80,934
- 2010 92,943 .862 80,144
- 2011 94,337 .841 79,362
- Total 653,102
g0.015 r.025
31The Value of Lost Earnings
- Finding PDV
- The summation of column 4 will give the PDV of
lost wages (653,102) - The amount Jennings family could actually
recover as compensation would also depend on - Taxes the Jennings would have paid on his salary
- Fringe benefits they would have received (eg.
health insurance) - Home production (eg. yard work, childcare) Mr.
Jennings would have provided - Consumption by Mr. Jennings (food and clothing
expenses if he would have lived)
32Alternatives to NPV
- Benefit-cost ratio
- problem
- will select projects with high relative net
benefit, not necessarily greatest total net
benefit
33Alternatives to NPV
- Internal rate of return (IRR)
- IRR is the rate of return (r) such that PV of
benefits equals the present value of costs - compute IRR and compare to market interest rate
34Net Present Value of a Factory
10
8
6
4
Net Present Value ( millions)
2
0
-2
-4
-6
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Interest Rate, r
35Alternatives to NPV
- Internal rate of return (IRR)
- problems
- if negative cash flows at beginning and later in
project can get multiple solutions
36Alternatives to NPV
- Internal rate of return (IRR)
- problems
- IRR gives discount rate at which net present
value is zero, but at other discount rates the
preferred project may be different
37Net Present Value of a Factory
10
8
6
4
Net Present Value ( millions)
2
0
-2
-4
Project 1
Project 2
-6
0
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
Interest Rate, R
38 End of Lecture 21